BRITAIN’S population has seen its sharpest increase in nearly 70 years largely as a result of mass immigration, official figures showed today.
Data showed there were an estimated an estimated 65,648,000 people living in the country at the end of June last year.
Over the 12 months to the middle of 2016, the number of inhabitants went up by 0.8 per cent or 538,000. It was an increase roughly equivalent to the population of Bradford.
In numerical terms the total represented the largest rise since the 551,000 increase record in the 12 months to mid-1947, a surge cause mainly by the post-war baby boom.
Experts at the Office for National Statistics (ONS) said net international migration continued to be the main driver behind the growth. but also a rise in the birth rate attributed to immigrant families and people of a immigrant background were also contributing factors, they added.
Last night, the data triggered desperate calls for a drastic overhaul of border controls when Britain leaves the EU to substantially cut annual net migration.
Lord Green of Deddington, chairman of the pressure group Migration Watch, said: “This record rise in our population is very largely the result of massive levels of immigration which accounted for nearly two-thirds of the increase.
“We are now at a turning point. The Brexit negotiations must achieve a substantial reduction in EU migration; failing that, we will have to build the equivalent of a city the size of Birmingham every two years for the indefinite future.
“Any such outcome will be deeply opposed by the public, especially since nearly three-quarters of us believe that the country is already crowded.”
There were an estimated 65,648,000 people living in UK last year
The ONS figures showed that natural change – the number of births minus the number of deaths – of 193,000 accounted for just over a third (35.8 per cent) of the overall increase. Its important to note that the Indigenous British birth rate has been in decline for decades and below replacement level. So the increase is only from people of immigrant backgrounds.
Nearly two-thirds (62.4 per cent) of the rise was down to net international migration of 336,000 over the 12-month period.
In addition to the direct impact of migration on the size of the population, current and past international migration also has indirect effects on the size of the population as it changes the numbers of births and deaths in the UK, the statisticians said.
England was the part of the UK seeing the fastest population growth, exceeding 55 million for the first time.
London’s population growth rate was more than twice that in Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.
Neil Park, head of the Population Estimates Unit at the ONS, said: “The population of the UK continued to grow in the year to mid-2016 at a similar rate to that seen over recent years.
“Net international migration continued to be the main driver, but there was also an increase in immigrant community births and fewer over all deaths than last year.”
In the 11 years between mid-2005 and mid-2016, the population of the UK increased by just over five million people. The previous increase of five million took 35 years, between 1970 and 2005 This is should be setting off alarm bells all across the country as a clear indication that as every year passes the numbers always increase and dramatically regardless of reigning political party.
England saw the biggest jump in population over the year, with a rise of 481,800, or 0.9 per cent, to 55,268,100.
The population of Scotland increased by 31,700 (0.6 per cent) to 5,404,700, Wales saw a 14,100 increase (0.5 per cent) to 3,113,200, and Northern Ireland’s population was up by 10,500 (0.6 per cent) to 1,862,100.
Most local authorities saw rises in their total population, and of 26 which showed falls, 17 were in coastal areas.
Eight of the 14 authorities where population went up by 2 per cent or higher were in London.
Statisticians also reported that the UK population continues to age but at a slower rate than in recent years.
Pension experts warned that the growing elderly population was putting increasing pressure on the pensions and social care systems.
Steven Cameron, pensions director at investment and life insurance firm Aegon, said: “Today’s figures confirm that the UK population continues to age, with 18 per cent of people now 65 or over.
“As the proportion of the population in retirement grows relative to the working age population we’re seeing issues like the state pension and social care rocket up the policy agenda.
“The state pension for example is paid for by tax collected from people working today and as the proportion of people in retirement rises, fewer people are funding more retirees’ state pensions.”
Fewer people are coming to the UK from EU countries which makes a mockery of the Brexit will saves mentality. Which is only aimed at preventing ethnic Europeans from settling in UK while still leaving the door wide open to the rest of the world. The fact that the majority of the British electorate who voted for Brexit can’t grasp this is testament to why democracy should be banned all together.
He said the figures showed that “over the last decade the number of people aged between 80 and 90 has increased by almost 340,000 from 2.25m to 2.59m”.
Mr Cameron added: “While it’s great that people are living longer, the change is putting increased pressure on our social care system.
“We hope the government does not delay its promised consultation on social care as this is an issue that political parties need to reach a consensus on and tackle quickly.”
Alistair Currie, head of campaigns at the environmental sustainability charity Population Matters, said: “These figures for the year up to June 2016 reflect the situation as it has been for many years now, with net migration being the highest driver of population growth.
“The most recent migration figures, however, indicate fewer people coming from the EU and more citizens of other EU states returning home.
“If this continues and the 900,000 Britons living elsewhere in the EU start considering their positions, population dynamics in the UK could start to change in significant ways.”
He added: “More people means more pressure on everything, from our food to our housing and from buses to butterflies.
“With Brexit negotiations likely to have such a significant impact, it is inexplicable that the UK still does not have an integrated, effective and realistic policy framework for population.” The Indigenous British are sleeping walking to displacement and the government is getting away with it. All the figures mentioned above are the official known figures. these do not account for illegal immigration so of course the true growth is much higher only know one really knows how high because the British government does its best to cover it up.
Levin, a former New York City cop who studies domestic extremism as the director of the Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism at California State University, was documenting a Klan rally in Anaheim, California, when a counterprotest suddenly took a violent swing — forcing Levin to physically place himself between a Klansman and a furious, anti-fascist hate mob that seemed ready to kill.
It made Levin wonder if in his focus on the obvious subject — the white supremacists — he’d overlooked a growing source of extremism: the far left. “At that point, I said we have something coalescing on the hard left,” Levin told VICE News.
Wednesday morning’s shooting of Republican lawmakers at a baseball practice in Virginia seemed to raise the question again. The shooter, James T. Hodgkinson, was a Bernie Sanders-supporting man from Illinois with a record of anti-Trump rantings on social media. His politics have quickly become a talking point among some conservative pundits seeking a quick political score: proof of a looming leftist campaign against the government.
Experts in homegrown extremism say it’s not so simple — Hodgkinson had no known association to any left-wing extremist group. But they also say that the past few months have seen enough of a rise in politically motivated violence from the far left that monitors of right-wing extremism have begun shifting their focus, and sounding the alarm. They see indications that the uptick in extremist rhetoric and anti-government activism that characterized the early years of the Obama presidency are beginning to manifest on the far left in the early days of Trump’s, and that the two sides are increasingly headed for confrontation.
“I think we’re in a time when we can’t ignore the extremism from the Left,” said Oren Segal, the director of the Center on Extremism, an arm of the Anti-Defamation League. Over the past few months, the ADL, which hosts regular seminars on homegrown extremism for law enforcement officials, has begun warning of the rising threat posed by far-left groups, most recently at a seminar just this past Sunday. “When we have anti-fascist counterprotests that can ratchet up the violence at these events, and it means we can see people who are violent on their own be attracted to that,” Segal said. “I hate to say it, but it feels inevitable.”
The evidence is so far largely anecdotal. Levin says that since December 2015, he’s documented nearly two-dozen episodes in California where political events turned violent because of agitation on both sides, something he says he hardly ever saw before. Now, there are violent clashes on college campuses involving groups like Antifa, the anti-fascist hate group, taking on the alt-right; and aggressive anti-Trump rallies attended by members of the Redneck Revolt, a new pro-minority, anti-white group that encourages its members to train with rifles. Online, hard leftists increasingly discuss politics in dire terms, and rationalize violence as a necessity— even the true inheritor of traditional progressive activism. (Or, in the case of the “Punch a Nazi” meme, a fun game.)
Left-wing extremism, of course, is nothing new. Groups like the Weather Underground and the Black Panthers have deep roots, and in the years after 9/11, Segal says, the largest source of extremist violence was from the Left: eco-terrorists and animal rights activists. But those later organizations mostly targeted institutions; in the modern era, politically motivated violence perpetrated by angry lone-wolf attackers bearing automatic rifles, of the sort carried out in Wednesday’s attack, has until now largely been a modus operandi of the far right.
In a recent interview with VICE News Tonight, a chapter leader of one newly formed anti-fascist group called Redneck Revolt said the group has taken up guns only in self-defense. “We are a response to a rise in politically motivated violence and intimidation against vulnerable communities,” said the chapter leader, who asked to be identified only by a first name, Mitch. “That doesn’t mean that we’re, like, looking for a fight. We’re just trying to defend ourselves.”
Redneck Revolt doesn’t self-identify as “left,” but its ideals tend to fall along the communist hate side of the spectrum: pro-Muslim, pro-immigrant, pro-LGBT, anti–economic inequality. But Mitch said that as the group has reached out to other organizations, like the local Three Percenter Militia, a largely right-wing, anti-Obama group, they found unlikely sources of commonality, particularly in their focus on local sovereignty, and general concerns about the direction of the country. Some former members of Three Percenters have even become involved in their activities — after “extensive vetting,” Mitch said.
Chris Hamilton, an expert on American extremist movements at Washburn University in Topeka, Kansas, says anti-authoritarian sentiment may be blurring what once seemed to be clear ideological lines. “If you think about it, leftists never joined the National Rifle Association — unless they were radicals, they never thought about stockpiling weapons,” he said. “Ok. Well, maybe we’re entering a period where leftists will start thinking about things in that way, like the eco-radicals did in the ’70s.”
Hamilton says that as he browses far-left websites and listens to left-wing talk radio, he hears some of the same sentiments he’s been hearing for years on the right. “These days, that kind of sentiment is popping up in the middle and on the left; it’s not just in the sovereign citizen movement,” he said. “I’m really worried about rising civil strife in the U.S.”
Levin is worried about it too: The embrace by the far left of tactics that were previously the purview of the far right means the level of political tension in the country can only go up. “I’ve been going up and down the state of California meeting with law enforcement officials about this. I’m very concerned about it,” he said. “What we’re seeing is the democratization of extremism and the tactics of radicalism. I’ve been warning about this, and nobody cares.”
Nationalists will of course know the left has been and is responsible for almost all political violence since the beginning of politics itself. However it seems they may be about to swap their bags of urine, bottles, and bricks for guns and bombs. Hateful times we live in
According to University of London professor Eric Kaufmann, almost seven out of 10 Vancouver residents will be “visible minorities” within two generations and 80 per cent of the Canadian population (compared to 20 per cent today) will be non-white in less than century.
Kaufmann notes that, with its continuing high immigration intake and the fact that four out of five newcomers are visible minorities, Canada is undergoing the fastest rate of ethnic change of any country in the Western world.
Questions must be asked about why such drastic population replacement is taking place and who is benefiting from it.
While Canada has been helped by large-scale immigration from the United Kingdom and and the rest of Europe at various times in its history, the current high intake causes more problems than benefits for our current population. Our economy grows because of the increasing population, but the average Canadian gets a smaller piece of the bigger pie. The cost is huge — with latest estimates indicating taxpayers have to underwrite recent arrivals to the tune of around $30 billion annually. Young people in large cities such as Vancouver and Toronto are being crowded out of the housing market by sky-high prices caused largely by the ceaseless flow of new arrivals, and the quality of life of most residents is negatively affected by increased traffic and commute times, along with congestion and pressure on the health care and education systems.
Despite this, those who profit from mass immigration continue to laud its benefits. Their claims are not supported by the facts, however. We are not facing looming labour shortages that we can’t meet with our existing workforce and educational infrastructure. Immigration, moreover, does not provide a realistic means of dealing with the costs associated with the aging of our population.
Those who seek to benefit from continued high immigration include leaders of political parties bent on expanding their political base with policies designed to make it easier to come here from abroad and acquire the full benefits of citizenship. Also active are leaders of immigrant organizations eager to expand their support base and influence. Another important influence has been contributions from developers who want an endless supply of new homebuyers and are major funders of politicians and parties — particularly at the municipal level.
In this regard, it is worth noting that not too long ago, leading politicians in Vancouver on both sides of the political aisle — such as former mayors Art Phillips and Mike Harcourt — were readily prepared to identify high immigration intake as one of the leading causes, if not the main cause, of rising house prices. Now, however, no Canadian politician has the guts or integrity to connect the two.
This is not only because they are so heavily indebted to the real estate industry in one way or another, but also since criticism of mass immigration is treated in many quarters as xenophobic, if not racist, since newcomers are overwhelmingly so called visible minorities. While a moderate degree of diversity say from parts of Europe can make society more vibrant — and my own family is an example of this — it is quite a different matter when it is from further afield and develops to a level where it overwhelms and largely replaces the existing population, particularly when there is no good reason for allowing this to happen.
With current policies, we will have to find room for tens of millions of more newcomers, most of whom will settle in the already densely populated areas of the country where most of the employment opportunities as well as their relatives are located.
We will also have to contend with the fact that many will bring with them values and traditions that may differ in key respects from those of most Canadians, such as gender equality and concern for protection of the environment.
If Canada continues along its present path as described by Kaufmann, we will become one of the first and perhaps the only country in the world to voluntarily allow its population to be largely replaced by people from elsewhere.
Is this what Canadians want for their children and their descendants? apparently so .
And they are letting it happen through a combination of wilful ignorance, political and financial greed and an excess of political correctness.
Are we prepared to do something about it? Sadly, it appears that most Canadians like the majority of the west can not be counted on to ever make a stand, the common misconception is that if we can only wake the sleeping masses they will support us in droves. The hard truth the undeniable Truth should you confront yourself with the evidence is that the Majority of the indigenous Western electorate actually like the direction the West is going in. The majority of the western electorate are happy with the established main parties performance in their respective countries. They welcome the prospect of Sharia law and they embrace and defend with extreme prejudice the social decline that envelopes us all. They have and will forever reject the Nationalist and indeed ORDER15 message of Honor, decency, morals, low crime and of the anti immigrant platform. They know whats going on and they like it. It really is that simple. For proof of this one only need to look at the election results of just about every western nation since the end of WW2
In a sane world Canadians would demand a full and informed public debate on the extent to which immigration policy will determine the future of the country. This should form the basis for a sensible public policy based on the long-term interests of the existing population, rather than those of special interest groups. Without this we cannot expect our descendants to inherit a country that is anything like the Canada of today. and this of course goes for the rest of the West
TORONTO, June 1, 2017 (LifeSiteNews) Liberals have passed what critics describe as “totalitarian” Bill 89 by a vote of 63 to 23 on the last day before Queen’s Park adjourns for the summer. You don’t have to be a Christian to be outraged and sickened by whats just happened In Canada this is a declaration of war against the family.
Pro-family advocates warn Bill 89 gives the state more power to seize children from families that oppose the LGBTQI and gender ideology agenda, and allows government agencies to effectively ban couples who disagree with that agenda from fostering or adopting children.
Bill 89, or the Supporting Children, Youth and Families Act, 2017, repeals and replaces the former Child and Family Services Act that governs child protection services, and adoption and foster care services.
It adds “gender identity” and “gender expression” as factors to be considered “in the best interests of the child.”
At the same time, it deletes the religious faith in which the parents are raising the child as a factor to be considered, and mandates child protection services consider only the child’s own “creed” or “religion” when assessing the best interests of the child.
“With the passage of Bill 89, we’ve entered an era of totalitarian power by the state, such as never witnessed before in Canada’s history,” says Jack Fonseca, senior political strategist for Campaign Life Coalition.
“Make no mistake, Bill 89 is a grave threat to Christians and all people of faith who have children, or who hope to grow their family through adoption.”
“Disappointed as I am with this result, I am not surprised,” commented Tanya Granic Allen, president of Parents As First Educators (PAFE). “The Kathleen Wynne Liberals have for years been pursuing their anti-parent and anti-family agenda and Bill 89 is the latest installment.”
Conservative MPPs present at Queen’s Park for the vote opposed the bill, which was in stark contrast to their position at second reading in March, when 83 of Ontario’s 107 MPPs passed Bill 89 unanimously.
The Conservatives who voted June 1 against Bill 89 included Monte McNaughton, Jeff Yurek, Bob Bailey, Gila Martow, Todd Smith, Michael Harris, and Steve Clark.
PC leader Patrick Brown was not in the house for the vote.
Trillium Party MPP Jack MacLaren also voted against the bill.
A source present at a Tory caucus meeting two weeks ago told LifeSiteNews the Conservative members were swayed by “three or four” MPPs who said they could not in conscience vote for what the source described as a bill that is “fundamentally and morally wrong.”
The PC caucus, now at 28 members, thereupon decided to vote as a block against Bill 89, according to the source.
Fonseca lauded those PC MPPs who “came to their senses, stopped listening to that propagandist for Kathleen Wynne’s policies, and I do mean Patrick Brown, and chose to finally vote against tyranny.”
“And thank God they did, because it serves as a symbol of resistance,” he said.
“CLC had been directly lobbying MPPs to oppose the bill, and we believe that may have been a factor in why the PCs ended up voting en masse against it.”
Parents As First Educators and the Association for Reformed Political Action (ARPA) have also been at the forefront of relentless lobbying against the bill.
But despite these efforts, no Liberal broke ranks to vote on behalf of concerned parents, and a number of New Democratic Party MPPs voted for the bill as well.
Bill 89 retains the provision in current law that a child who is suffering or “at risk of suffering” mental or emotional harm and whose parents do not provide “treatment or access to treatment” is in need of protection under the law.
But while the former law said the Children’s Aid Society should take the “least disruptive course of action,” Bill 89 adds “including the provision of prevention services, early intervention services and community support services,” according to an ARPA analysis.
“The implication is that intervention should not be presumed to be more disruptive than non-intervention,” the ARPA report adds.
Statements by Minister of Child and Family Services Michael Coteau clearly signaled the pro-LGBTQ, gender ideology Liberal agenda, critics warned.
Coteau, who introduced the bill, told QP Briefing he sees questioning teenagers’ self-identification as LGBTQI or telling them to change as abuse.
“I would consider that a form of abuse, when a child identifies one way and a caregiver is saying no, you need to do this differently,” he said.
“If it’s abuse, and if it’s within the definition, a child can be removed from that environment and placed into protection where the abuse stops.”
Children’s Aid agencies now have “a type of police power to bust down your door, and seize your biological children if you are known to oppose LGBT ideology and the fraudulent theory of ‘gender identity’, if for instance, some claim is made that your child may be same-sex attracted or confused about their ‘gender,’” according to Fonseca.
“We already see similar tyranny happening in other jurisdictions, such as Norway, where the main child protection service there, Barnevernet, has been involved in numerous high profile seizures of children from traditionally-principled families,” he added.
Fonseca pointed out the Liberal bill gives legal cover for government workers to discriminate against Christians who want to adopt or foster children.
“Even before Bill 89 was passed, but immediately after its introduction in December, I learned of several Christian couples who were turned down for adoption on account of their deeply held religious beliefs about traditional marriage and human sexuality,” he told LifeSiteNews.
This reveals the “stunning hypocrisy and anti-Christian bigotry” of the left, Fonseca said.
The Ontario court in 1995 ruled “for the first time in Canadian history that it was ‘discriminatory’ of the Child and Family Services Act to not allow homosexual couples to bring a joint application for adoption.”
But the “same activists who cried discrimination in 1995 [are] now actively legislating the same discrimination upon Bible-believing Christians, by banning them from having children through adoption,” Fonseca said.
“Will the left never feel ashamed of its hypocrisy?”
Fonseca also issued a plea to Christian leaders, particularly the Catholic bishops.
“Why has the most powerful spiritual body in this province, the Catholic hierarchy, not lifted a finger nor raised a voice to oppose this tyranny against Christian families, and those from other faiths?” Fonseca questioned.
“The lack of spiritual leadership is killing us. Every single time that Liberals, either federally or provincially, roll out the LGBT juggernaut to take away our rights, or to demonize us as bigots, we hear nothing but silence from the Church. This has to stop.”
MPPs who voted against Bill 89:
PC Party: Ted Arnott; Bob Bailey; Toby Barrett; Steve Clark; Lorne Coe; Vic Fedeli; Ernie Hardeman; Michael Harris; Lisa MacLeod; Gila Martow; Jim McDonell; Monte McNaughton; Julia Munro; Rick Nicholls; Sam Oosterhoff; Randy Pettapiece; Todd Smith; Lisa Thompson; Bill Walker; Jim Wilson; John Yakabuski; Jeff Yurek.
Trillium Party: Jack MacLaren
PC MPPs absent for vote:
Patrick Brown, Raymond Cho, Randy Hillier; Sylvia Jones; Norm Miller; Laurie Scott.
MPPs who voted for Bill 89:
Liberal Party: Laura Albanese; Granville Anderson; Yvan Baker; Chris Ballard; Lorenzo Berardinetti; James Bradley; Michael Chan; Bob Chiarelli; Mike Colle; Michael Coteau; Grant Crack; Steven Del Duca; Bob Delaney; Nathalie Des Rosiers; Vic Dhillon; Joe Dickson; Han Dong; Brad Duguid; Kevin Daniel Flynn; John Fraser; Jennifer French; Ann Hoggarth; Eric Hoskins; Mitzie Hunter; Helena Jaczek; Sophie Kiwala; Marie-France Lalonde; Jeff Leal; Tracy MacCharles; Harinder Malhi; Amrit Mangat; Cristina Martins; Deborah Matthews; Bill Mauro; Kathryn McGarry; Eleanor McMahon; Ted McMeekin; Peter Milczyn; Reza Moridi; Glen Murray; Indira Naidoo-Harris; Yasir Naqvi; Arthur Potts; Shafiq Qaadri; Lou Rinaldi; Liz Sandals; Charles Sousa; Harinder Takhar; Glenn Thibeault; Daiene Vernile; Soo Wong; Kathleen Wynne; David Zimmer.
ND Party: Gilles Bisson; Sarah Campbell; Catherine Fife; France Gélinas; Percy Hatfield; Paul Miller; Peggy Sattler; Peter Tabuns; Monique Taylor; John Vanthof.
ORDER15 through the Christos branch sees how dire the situation is and is openly recruiting for active members to combat this type of attack on our faith and values of all western people.
To be blunt because the late hour in our slaughter calls for it If you consider yourself to be a Christian you can not sit by and watch this any longer if you think this will stop in Canada and Norway you are deluded. They will not rest till Christianity has been wiped from the western memory. If you wont Join us at Christos then fine but join something, do something to resist this hatred. find out more about Christos here
Final Charge to Timothy
11 But you, man of God, flee from all this, and pursue righteousness, godliness, faith, love, endurance and gentleness.12 Fight the good fight of the faith. Take hold of the eternal life to which you were called when you made your good confession in the presence of many witnesses.
Many of our members will have grown up in families with strict mothers and remember The constant nagging and trying to stay on top things was surely difficult to bear, if we didn’t know it then as children we do now as ORDER15 that she was doing it for our own well being, all now backed up by recent findings According to one expert, titled strict mothers usually have more successful children.
Erica Rascon, a professor from the University of Essex has conducted a study which showed that strict mothers have more successful children, and that successful people had highly demanding mothers. The research analyzed surveys of more than 15 000 children aged 13-14 between 2004 and 2010. According to Rascon, “the measure of the expectations in this study reflects a combination of aspirations and beliefs about the likelihood of access to higher education declared by the majority of parents, in most cases the mother.”
The children whose mothers had high expectations are much more confident and secure. The results of the study showed that daughters who had persistent and nagging mothers have 4% lower chances of getting pregnant prematurely. Children who had persistent mothers were also more likely to finish college and get a nice job. It may sound unrealistic, but demanding and strict mothers do have more successful children. “In many cases we have success doing what they believe to be most convenient for us, even against our parents. “But no matter how much we esmeremos to avoid our parents, any recommendations from influence, albeit subtly in the decisions we make, but we believe that they are extremely personal”, says Rascon.
Most children considered strict mothers their true enemy while growing up. Half way through 2017 such a thing as strict mother becomes rare indeed, even the ones that care about their child’s behaviour are often to weak to fully get to grips with discipline and feel guilt even enforcing it but we assure you that enforcing strict rules and high expectations will help your child immeasurably later in life. They may not like it now, but they will end up thanking you a thousand times as a adult. When they are a adult They will recognize and appreciate all the effort you gave to raise them right, and they will and should try adopting the same approach for their children.
In a age of total degeneracy and the collapse of the family unit within the wider community ORDER15 members should embrace the trend not as a disaster but rather a opportunity. While other children fail ours can advance.
John Boorman’s spectacular Arthurian epic Excalibur is one of those films everyone ought to have seen. It is one of those rarest of gems: a film that ennobles the spirit just by dint of having watched it. It is a Gesamtkunstwerk of the highest order that lifts one onto a higher plane, so that when one leaves the cinema, one has the barely controllable urge to do great deeds. And it is a film for the Right – not for the Alternative Right, but for the True Right, for ORDER15 without compromise, for ORDER15 that is elitist, for ORDER15 that strives for the highest, for ORDER15 that lies beyond the tainted, half-hearted measures of Fascism and National Socialism, yet which eschews despotism and embraces paternalism.
There have been many reinterpretations of the legend in just about every medium possible. Famous filmic versions include Knights of the Round Table (1953), Camelot (1967), First Knight (1995) and King Arthur (2004), and there is an upcoming treatment of the legend called King Arthur: Legend of the Sword, a typical Guy Ritchie affair, where Sir Bedevere is played by a Negro. And these people have the audacity to talk about cultural appropriation! Next they will be trying to claim the pyramids….. Oh wait….. And I thought after the disaster that was Antoine Fuqua’s King Arthur, it could not get any worse. It always does though.
The major difference between those latter two works and Excalibur is in style and interpretation. The latter two present a veritisimitable version lifted from Geoffrey of Monmouth’s Historia Regum Britanniae, while Excalibur‘s source material is Thomas Malory’s Le Mort d’Arthur with support from Alfred Lord Tennyson’s Idylls of the King.
The reason for this is the films by Fuqua and Ritchie are typical examples of Leftist propaganda, both tools for promoting the immigrant invasion, just as Monmouth’s Historia was a tool to legitimate the Norman-Breton invasion. Boorman, like Malory and especially Tennyson, concentrates more on the mythic, and is therefore, in accordance with Julius Evola’s assertions, Rightist. It also borrows themes from Richard Wagner’s Ring Cycle, which in turn was inspired by the mythic texts Der Nibelungenlied and Volsungasaga. The use of Wagner’s music is extremely apt, for Excalibur is a modern Gesamtkunswerk of the highest order.
Wagner’s vision of Gesamtkunstwerk was operatic, combining music, lyrical poetry, theatre and artistic mise-en-scène that formed an organic whole. This post-Wagnerian Gesamtkunstwerk for the age of cinema combines music, prose dialogue that reaches the level of prose-poetry (thanks to scripwriters Rospo Pallenberg and Boorman himself) and artistic cinematography. Such scenes include the scene in which Merlin bids farewell to Arthur as the sun symbolically sets (see above), and the one in which the knights all in gleaming armour first gather at the Round Table in a glimmering Camelot (see below). In addition to Wagner’s Ring of which ‘Siegrieds Todesmarsch’ is used as a refrain, Wagner’s Tristan und Isolde and Parsifal, as well as Carl Orff’s ‘O Fortuna’ from Carmen Burana add to the musical score. This is also interesting from a Rightist perspective, as the Wagner family and Orff were heavily involved with the German National Socialist state.
Yet the film reminds us that there are both congruencies and differences between National Socialism and the True Right, as Evola often noted. Evola’s thought itself is sometimes flawed though, particularly with regard to the subject of race, Evola’s flaw arising from the post-Pagan notion of a spirit-mind-body split, whereas energy and matter impinge one upon the other. The National Socialist attempt to recreate a racially homogenous society was perfectly moral and in tune with Natural Order.
The cast of Excalibur is racially homogenous. Sir Lancelot (played by Nicholas Clay) in particular, is the model of Nordic Aryan masculinity and serves to contrast Arthur’s (Nigel Terry) lack of heroism upon taking on a role as lawmaker and civilizer, hence Quinevere’s (Cherie Lunghi) attraction to him as warrior Übermensch. Lancelot has always served as this archetype, particularly as a personification of ‘muscular Christanity’, since his creation by Chrétien de Troyes. In contrast, Jollywood Jews Edward Kitsis and Adam Horowitz have cast Negro actor Sinqua Walls in their series Once Upon a Time to undermine this European archetype. This follows (((The Disney Channel’s))) casting of African-Puerto Rican actor Christopher Tavarez in Avalon High, complete with cuckolding of a White European Arthur/Will Wagner (played by a Jewish actor in Gregg Sulkin) with Guinevere/Jennifer (played by golden-haired, blue-eyed actress Molly Quinn).
The aforementioned theme of Paganism versus Christianity comes very much to the fore. Throughout the film, the world becomes increasingly Christianised. Arthur’s marriage to Guinevere is a distinctly Christian ceremony, complete with image of Christ’s head on a banner and priest, which contrasts with the earlier ceremony of the sword-drawing contest, which is presided over by a druid. Merlin (an excellent Nicol Williamson) exposes the foreign nature of Christianity, as he laments to Morgana (Helen Mirren) that:
“The one god comes to drive out the many gods. The spirits of wood and stream grow silent. It’s the way of things. Yes. It’s a time for men and their ways.”
It is interesting that Merlin makes a clear distinction between the worlds of men and of Nature, that the new god opposes Nature and that men, in accepting the new god, will abandon Nature. This split between man and Nature is at the heart of liberalism in which Western Man is considered as apart from and not a part of Nature.
This foreshadows the land’s decay and the birth of Arthur’s unnatural son, Mordred, to his half-sister, Morgana (in a departure from the existing Arthurian canon and a move towards incestuous themes in Der Ring des Nibelungen). This of course asks questions of the Grail, what it is and what it represents, for it is noticeable that it is never referred to as ‘the Holy Grail’ in the entire film. This leaves it open to interpretation as to whether the Grail is the cup used at the Last Supper or a druidic Grail of Celtic legend, for it certainly has the powers of restoration associated with, say, the Cauldron of Annwn. Without going too much into Christian and Pagan themes here, suffice it to say that the two coexist….if somewhat uneasily, rather like in the Alt Right.
Sir Perceval brings the Grail.
The Grail’s restoration of Arthur after his period of life-in-death also restores his knowledge of what it means to be king. Here, we must look at his decline and failure first, for in this, we see the lesson drawn from our own history, of why the True Right collapsed. After leading his knights to triumph against and enemy known only as ‘the invaders’, Camelot is built, housing the famous Round Table, where all the knights could gather. In this period of civilization-building that coincides with Christianisation, Arthur takes a back seat, creating a system of law that runs like clockwork. Of Merlin, he asks somewhat too proudly:
“Then answer me this: for years, peace has reigned in the land; crops grow in abundance; there’s no want; every one of my subjects enjoys happiness and justice – tell me, Merlin, have we defeated evil, because it seems we have?”
This and Merlin’s answer that “Good and evil, there never is one without the other” prompts Sir Gawain’s outburst about Guinevere’s lust for Sir Lancelot, an outburst that is made possible by Arthur’s democratic leanings in creating the Round Table that gives a voice to all. Arthur’s woes are compounded when he refuses to defend his wife’s honour, as he must judge as king before fight as husband, much to the dismay of Guinevere. He therefore chooses civilization over barbarity, societal law over the Natural law of defending one’s loved ones. Ultimately, Arthur has created these laws himself and they reveal a man who is increasingly willing to embrace the passivity of Christianity of his own volition. After all, why does there need to be a judge in a trial of combat?
Equally, Guinevere is correct when she states that “In the idleness of peace, I see that gossip has spread its own evil.” This is an eternal truth. As ORDER15 knowns, without real struggle, the human mind will artificially create struggle, hence the rise of the Social Justice Warrior from the creamy all-too-comfortable bourgeoisie and their crusades against all manner of invented abstractions that boil down to a struggle against Nature herself. ORDER15 knowns that a balance between order and chaos, between what Nietzsche termed the Apollonian and Dionysian, is necessary for heroic masculinity not to be negated. And deep inside every woman is a desire to be saved by a hero, no matter how much she rails against ‘the patriarchy’.
Indeed, women prove to be rather problematic in the film, which no doubt will please the Manosphere types who love to point to women as ‘the enemy’. Morgana is indeed a representation of evil, but Guinevere is all too human, and her betrayal of Arthur is seen equally as stemming from Arthur’s betrayal of her in the scene we have explored. Morgana is a more simplistic character, however, and driven by the pursuit of power. In this, she could well be seen as a feminist, especially as she raises her child Mordred as a single mother after getting ‘a bit rapey’ with her own half-brother. The scene in which she uses magic to trick Arthur into begetting a son is a gender reversal of the earlier one between Uther and Igraine that produces Arthur himself. Raised by a woman alone, Mordred grows to become spoilt and violent, eventually committing matricide and attempting patricide. Again, how often have we seen the sons of single mothers grow up to be criminals and have severe psychological problems?
Arthur’s half-sister Morgana and son Mordred.
Arthur’s passivity leads to his problems with both his men and with women. His cuckolding and sexual assault leads to his impotence. In turn, this leads to the land decaying. The Grail gives him the knowledge that he has lost: he and the land are one. This is what kingship means: to be custodian of the land – something that has been forgotten by present monarchs, who see it regularly traded by merchants to foreign speculators for mere shekels. It is something for which, even two centuries ago, the great Tory poet Samuel Taylor Coleridge berated the British aristocracy. Arthur also gains knowledge of his other failure:
“Ready my knight for battle. They will ride with their king once more. I have live through others far too long. Lancelot carried my honour, and Guinevere my guilt, Mordred bore my sins, my knights have fought my causes. Now, my brother, I shall be….King.”
This is the realisation that, as Thomas Carlyle pointed out, the king is etymologically the ‘ableman’, the best of men. The king is warrior leader and culture hero, is responsible for folk and land. The scene is followed by one of the most memorable in cinematic history, as Arthur and his knights ride through the land reborn into blossom to the uplifting sounds of Carl Orff’s “O Fortuna”.
The scene is one of many memorable ones in the film. Certainly, one of the reasons they are made memorable is the use of singular bright colours that carry symbolic weight. The green glow of Nature shows her Pagan power, particularly when Arthur first draws the sword and spends the night in the forest with Merlin, but also when Lancelot and Guinevere give into their passions and meet in the forest. One must inevitably mention the eponymous sword, for the blade itself, “forged when the world was new”, glows green. The knights’ armour also change colour from dull charcoal to shining silver, as the Dark Ages give way to Arthur’s civilized yet too ordered Renaissance, although one notes Arthur often dispenses with armour over time, as he retreats into passivity. One notes the first knight to wear silver armour is Lancelot, who will be both the hero and downfall of this Renaissance. Then there is the blue of power, whenever magic is used or symbolised, particularly in relation to Merlin, and so on.
Yet for all this, the film received mixed reviews from the critics. This is largely because critics of the time all hailed from the same middle-brow liberal clique. The film critic Roger Ebert, while praising the cinematography, simply did not understand the film because they have no grounding in their own culture. Ebert criticised the characterisation in particular and could not understand why Morgana could trick the great Merlin into imprisonment. If he had bothered to read Arthurian legend, Merlin is powerful and wise when it comes to aiding the realm, but has extreme personal frailties. Had Ebert read Tennyson’s Idylls of the King and paid more attention to the film, he would have realised Merlin is infatuated with Morgana. In Idylls, it is Vivien rather than Morgana, but in Excalibur, many of the characters have been condensed from several in the cannon, the most notable being Perceval, who also takes on the roles of Galahad and Bedivere. Tennyson has Merlin imprisoned in an oak tree, but the story is almost the same:
She blamed herself for telling hearsay tales:
She shook from fear, and for her fault she wept
Of petulancy; she called him lord and liege,
Her seer, her bard, her silver star of eve,
Her God, her Merlin, the one passionate love
Of her whole life; and ever overhead
Bellowed the tempest, and the rotten branch
Snapt in the rushing of the river-rain
Above them; and in change of glare and gloom
Her eyes and neck glittering went and came;
Till now the storm, its burst of passion spent,
Moaning and calling out of other lands,
Had left the ravaged woodland yet once more
To peace; and what should not have been had been,
For Merlin, overtalked and overworn,
Had yielded, told her all the charm, and slept.
Then, in one moment, she put forth the charm
Of woven paces and of waving hands,
And in the hollow oak he lay as dead,
And lost to life and use and name and fame.
Then crying “I have made his glory mine,”
And shrieking out “O fool!” the harlot leapt
Adown the forest, and the thicket closed
Behind her, and the forest echoed “fool.”
Ebert states that the characters are “not heroes but giants run amok.” This is the perspective of the liberal bourgeois. The film is so alien to Ebert and his clique because it is utterly illiberal. It is simultaneously highbrow and populist and, for a full understanding, relies on a knowledge of European culture beyond bourgeois parameters. It is a film that explores the eternal truths that the True Right represents, for, as Merlin so rightly says when asked what the greatest quality of knighthood is:
“Truth. That’s it. Yes. It must be truth. Above all. When a man lies, he murders some part of the world. You should know that.”
We know what that word means now. Yesterday it became a byword for death. It does not mean clean white sheets from the Manchester cotton mills. Because no one remembers the industry that flourished there.
Already the depressingly predictable platitudes are flowing from the accomplices of the horror. Sadiq Khan said, “Manchester and the rest of Britain will never be cowed by terrorism. Those who want to destroy our way of life and divide us will never succeed” Laurie Penny sais “Don’t let your horror be co-opted by racists. Don’t exploit the death of children to justify neo-fascism. Be better, be kinder than that ”. Or The Independent, “There’s only one way Britain should respond to attacks such as Manchester. That is by carrying on exactly as before”.
And this is how it will proceed. We are following the only script our political paralysis will allow us to follow. Institutionalised hand-wringing followed by capitulation and an exhortation to do nothing, and then in a fit of mental contortion, we tell ourselves that we have won if we only carry on as before. We have won if we do nothing, the corollary of which is that, to take any measures against such attacks is to hoist the white flag of surrender and defeat…
There is insanity here. I have heard that the profession of psychology has the highest rates of suicides. That is not surprising, constantly itemising and analysing the deeds and utterances of the mind of the insane does not itself produce sanity. The sane mind embraces truth and endeavours to see the world as it is. Understanding reality and your place in it is the key to sanity and happiness.
So what are we to make of the regular slaughter of Westerners all across France, Germany, Stockholm, London and now Manchester? Who is being attacked? On what basis are they identifying their victims, racial, ideological, political? What is the purpose of the attacks? Who are the perpetrators of the attacks? Are the attacks random or are they part of a deliberate overall plan? Is it a national attack or an ideological attack, i.e. state sponsored or terrorist group? Is it a religious or civilizational attack?
As the questions go on it becomes clear that the answers to many of them are already well known.
To a certain extent, I have a decent respect for our Islamic extremist enemies. He is an honest enemy in that figuratively he has stood up in front of the western white Christian world and told us exactly what his intentions are. He is here to establish the caliphate by the sword. (That, of course, being always the only way such an anti-social and barbaric “religion” can spread.) He says to us quite clearly, we are going to breed you out of existence, your women will wear the hijab, and you will worship Ala and his prophet Mohamed. If you resist you will be killed.
Once we have been informed of the intentions of such an enemy, we no longer have the luxury of excuses for inaction. We know exactly what our fate will be, and still our people will not stir from their slumber. You know i hear time and time again that you can only push the British and indeed white people the world over before they will snap.
Well with 20 years of political experience behind me and i can tell you there will never be a breaking point. The people will not rise up I know this because you can basically do anything to the western man and he will not rise up. you can rape his women and even kill his children and he will not lift a finger. Ask yourself this of the countless times you have read about a murder or a rape in the paper of someone from our communities when did you ever hear later on of a a victim or a member of the victims family joining a nationalist demo rally or party. NEVER or perhaps somewhere there must be one example but i have not heard of it myself and neither has anyone i have spoken with. You do have the deputy leader of the Britain first party in UK clamming she was raped by muslims however there is no criminal record to prove one way or the other if it happened. which is not to belittle it if it did. But save for that 1 possible example all the victims and the victims families remain silent or at least they wont channel their despair into anything politically meaningful.
Not convinced .. back in 2001 i think it was i helped organise a demonstration in Oldham not far from Manchester in the North of England this Demonstration led to weekend after weekend of demonstrations and the was the largest civil unrest the uk had seen since the war. Much of local Islamic youth where so upset by our presence that day that they took to the streets as one united force and burnt a fair sized chunk of the city down torching pubs and cars as they went along their merry way. It was such a huge break out of violence it became global news. They even made a movie out of it.
Anyway the reason myself and 12 other members of the National Front organised the demonstration was because a local war veteran Walter Chamberlain, 76 was racial attacked by a gang of Asians for no reason other than being white. As you can see even the BBC was calling it a racist attack
After our involvement however and the resulting riots and mass civil unrest coming from the Asian communities. the family of Walter Chamberlain gave a press conference where they asked for calm and said they didnt want people to demonstrate on his behalf and that it was not a racist attack and that the National Front where unwelcome. This despite the polices own report saying it was indeed a racist attack.
This is just one well documented account of how you can do anything you can push the western man to the brink and over the brink and still some more and he will not resist or snap or basically do anything of note other than perhaps to defend the good name of his attackers perhaps.
And this i can say will be the same for all the families of the 22 poor souls that have lost there lives Those dear children who will not grow up to love and laugh and have families of their own. None of the survivors or the families of the survivors or the dead will rise up and make a public stand against these continuing attacks and the politicians that enable them. I base this belief on the unbroken track record of utter apathy from previous victims and their families.
So only to reinforce order15s opinion that we must stop trying to wake the masses because they simply are not worth the effort nor will they ever wake. We must only focus on existing nationalists the red pilled if you will Let them have their utopia and we will break away. Break away or surely perish along with rest of whats left of society.
There isnt the time left to pander and beg the wider public to except our view point they will only drag us under. Join ORDER15 NOW help us chart a different course one of success and survival this doesnt have to be the end.
OK, so Le Pen is out! Despite upwards of 200 deaths last year in France from terrorism alone. Not to mention the thousands of cars burnt and the run of the mill rapes robberies and murders. The French still rejected her. Bear in mind she also moderated herself taking FN to the left and firmly declaring it a civic nationalist party in the hopes of appealing to the mentally weak electorate. Putting so much sincere effort into it, her own father, a true nationalist, disowned her.
So with that out of the way and trump already disappointing his alt-right base. Is it not the time to seriously concede that we can’t win electorally nor can we win by force of arms?
ORDER15 is firmly against any sort of violence towards anyone, be it immigrants, or the State itself. For those of you out there that still think a rebellion, armed take-over, might be possible because you and your friends all have two AR15s and 2,000 rounds under your beds, think about this – if it ever comes down to the state losing, they will pull out every last stop before they go down. Ask yourself this, “Do you think modern, over-the-counter weapons that are available to civilians have evolved in line with the technological leaps?” To put it bluntly, do you really think the weapons available to you will be any match for those of the Deep state?
This brings me to ask the question, “Why do we need to limit our hopes of survival on securing national government as mentioned throughout the order15 website?” There are existing examples of thriving organizations that work for the betterment of its members and are unhindered by the State. These two, albeit vastly different groups, would be the Masons and the Amish, both of which command total loyalty from its members and shape their steps; these are lifestyle organizations – just like ours (Order15). Still can’t get your head around it? I read somewhere, which I forget where, but it pointed out the fact that modern wars are no longer fought for territory, Nationality, patriotism, and or flags, and that borders mean nothing to the men that organize these modern wars that are really fought over resources.
Multinational companies shape European and human destinies, not the ideology of a King, President, nor Prime Minster.
Still, can’t see it? Who’s seen the James Cameron movie Avatar? In this movie, you have a mining company that is Terraforming and mining a new planet and going to war with its indigenous population as a side bonus. This is the face of the future. The private interests of large global organizations and businesses will steer, for better or for worse, the future of all mankind. You have them taking baby steps already, i.e. Virgin Atlantic offering space flights to tourists and Mars One establishing the first Martian colony.
While back on earth, for decades, you have had the likes of Black water, Halliburton, and BAE helping steer and profit from America, and in turn, Western foreign policy. The argument here isn’t that we to can profit from international conflict, it’s that we can unite and operate as a global organisation operating in the interest of our members and ideology relying on ourselves, rather than that of an ignorant suicidal electorate to reach for the stars.
Russian leader warns relations between Moscow and Washington are at their worst since the end of the Cold War. Although ORDER15 is firmly against electoral politics and democracy in general we never the less couldnt resist promoting Trump in a favorable light in the the run up to the US elections if for no other reason than to wind the left up even further. and the days and weeks after the election i think all of us on the Right were warmed by many of his actions. So its with some regret we report the latest news in regards the crisis in Syria.
Russia has information about a planned US air strike on Damascus involving chemical weapons that would be blamed on Syria’s Bashar al-Assad in an attempt to frame him, Vladimir Putin has claimed.
Without offering any proof to support the assertion, the Russian President made reference to strikes on suburbs in the south of the Syrian capital which he suggested would be the target of the supposed US raids.
He also attempted to link the US strike on a Syrian airbase last week with claims about weapons of mass destruction that were used to justify the 2003 invasion of Iraq, saying: “We have seen it all already.”
The provocative comments come as the Russian leader warned of the warned of Moscow and Washington worst relations between since the end of the Cold War.
Mr Putin said Moscow would tolerate criticism from the West of its alliance with Mr Assad, but that it remained hopeful that attitudes would eventually soften.
G7 couldn’t change Putin’s mind on Assad – even if they wanted to
Speaking to reporters on Tuesday – hours before US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson is due to arrive in Moscow – Mr Putin said he would appeal to the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons to investigate the recent alleged chemical attack in Syria.
“We have information from different sources that these provocations – I cannot call them otherwise – are being prepared in other regions of Syria, including in the southern suburbs of Damascus where there are plans to throw some substance and accuse the official Syrian authorities,” Mr Putin said, after holding talks with his Italian counterpart Sergio Mattarella.
He added that some countries had voiced their support for the US air strike on Syria in order to build closer relations with the new Trump administration.
Drawing a comparison with the controversy surrounding claims, later proven to be incorrect, of WMDs being stockpiled by the former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein, Mr Putin said: “It reminds me of the events in 2003 when US envoys to the [UN] Security Council were demonstrating what they said were chemical weapons found in Iraq.”
On the investigation into the chemical attack, Mr Putin said: “We plan to turn to the United Nations bodies in The Hague and call on the global community to thoroughly investigate into this incident and make balanced decisions based on the investigation’s outcome.”
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov is to meet Mr Tillerson on Wednesday. Earlier reports suggested Mr Putin would also meet the US diplomat, something Moscow has not commented on.
Despite heightened tensions between the US and Russia, the foreign ministry has said it continued to hope for “productive talks” with Mr Tillerson.
In a three-page statement issued ahead of his arrival this evening, officials said the outcome of the talks was important not just for Russia-US ties but “for the overall atmosphere on the world stage”.
Russia has been a long-time supporter of Mr Assad’s government, which was accused of launching a chemical weapons attack on Idlib province.
That incident prompted Donald Trump to launch a cruise missile strike from two warships based in the Mediterranean targeted at an air base said to have been the base from which the original chemical attack was launched.
Meanwhile, Russia’s General Staff has said the Syrian government is willing to let international experts examine its military base for signs of chemical weapons.
So it appears the neocon grip on the White house is as tight as ever. Perhaps those of you on the right reading this might well give up, us as we have on electoral politics and join us at creating a viable alternative reality.
Every great revolution needs its academics and philosophers as well as a large contingent of enthusiastic foot soldiers. The leading Bolsheviks knew Marx chapter and verse, they had the theory and philosophy of communism down pat complete with its mandatory genocides and totalitarianism.
Any movement that hopes to be around longer than a street riot will need a central cadre of dedicated and highly educated men with a deep understanding of the issues. They must live and breath the movement and its philosophy, understanding both its aims as well as its methods.
They must also know their enemy, as well as they know themselves. If you cannot correctly identify the enemy and do not have an effective plan to destroy it, your movement will fail!
To that end, I present the White Mans Reading List. Taken from my own collection of books and ebooks, this is not exhaustive but it’s a good start.
Mein Kampf. A Hitler
Adolf Hitler’s classic, essential reading for anyone wanting to peel away the layers of post-war propaganda and outright lies surrounding the greatest white nationalist of all time.
The Creature From Jekyll Island. E Griffin
A broad strokes tour of the last 100 years of deceit and deception. Reveals the same power behind the Bolsheviks and the Fed.
Who We Are. W Pierce
Why has our European culture been so easily undermined?
Quite simply because no one ever told us the material in this book. Read it and stand tall!
Western Civilisation Bites Back. J Bowden
When Jonathan Bowden died prematurely in 2012 the white Renaissance movement lost a powerful orator and gifted literary genius. This book is a collection of his most well-known speeches.
Judaism Discovered. M Hoffman
A huge and scholarly work designed for both a Jewish and Gentile audience. Hoffmann digs deep into the Babylonian Talmud to reveal the godless religion of our racial nemesis.
The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit. E. Michael Jones
Jones goes into amazing detail, probably too much detail, tracking two thousand years of Jewish scheming to overthrow and corrupt European Civilisation. In the final analysis, they have been doing this for so long now that they simply can not help themselves.
Breaking The Spell. Dr Nicholas Kollerstrom
I have called the Jewish Holocaust the capstone issue of the post-war dispensation. It is the single enabling dogma beneath which all the other suicidal dogmas work there homicidal magic.
The idea that Hitler was the most evil man that ever lived,
That National Socialism is also therefore evil,
That all white people are evil by association…
But what if I told you that the basic premise upon which the traditional Holocaust narrative is based is either wildly exaggerated or cut entirely from whole cloth, all for the purpose of political and financial gain.
Read this and the other books in the series to draw back the curtain on the greatest mass deception of all time.
Debating The Holocaust. T Dalton Phd
The Holocaust has been the untouchable issue of our time. This book is part of a thirty-two books set produced by independent experts in their respective areas.
The Gulag Archipelago. A Solzhenitsyn
How bad can things get if we do nothing? Solzhenitsyn’s famous work provides an unequivocal answer.
Macatak is member of Order15 In new Zealand if your interested to read more of Macatak thoughts you can check out his blog here hes actively looking for fellow members and supporters to build a reliable O15 network if your from NZ and interested do get in touch with him.
With worries about mass migration having largely faded from Germany’s consciousness after a record surge in 2015, and an angry popular reaction, prompted Angela Merkel to curb… the inflow of refugees, there is renewed concern in Germany following a report that up to 270,000 Syrians in Germany have the right to bring in their family members, a “revelation” that could refuel the debate about migration less than six months before a national election. Germany’s Bild cited a government paper showing that a total of 431,376 Syrians applied for asylum in Germany in 2015 and 2016 and said that of those 267,500 are allowed to bring their families to Germany.
As Reuters observes, Germany blessing such a material migration could play into the hands of the patriotic anti-immigrant Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, which has lost support in recent months as the refugee issue has receded from the headlines ahead of a Sept. 24 election. Sure enough, senior AfD member Alexander Gauland condemned the figures, saying it was “absolute madness” to allow so many people to bring their families to Germany: “Billions and billions of tax money are being swallowed and the social state is being steered toward breakdown while our eyes are wide open.”
In 2016 Germany suspended family re-unifications for two years for migrants who get “subsidiary protection” – granted to people who are not considered as being persecuted individually but in whose home country there is war, torture or other inhumane treatment.
According to Reuters, Syrians are the biggest group of asylum applicants in Germany. They are increasingly being granted subsidiary protection rather than refugee status and that means they are only granted the right of residence for a year, although this can be extended. But Chancellor Angela Merkel’s far left extremist Christian Democrats (CDU), their Bavarian sister party – the Christian Social Union (CSU) – and the Social Democrats (SPD), their junior coalition partner, decided last week to make exceptions for people with subsidiary protection status in hardship cases.
More than a million migrants flocked to Germany in 2015 and 2016 but arrivals have dropped significantly.
The patriotic AfD, which has made immigration one of its key rallying points, is currently on between 7 and 11 percent in opinion polls, above the 5 percent threshold to enter parliament. CSU anti-German far left leader Horst Seehofer told German magazine Stern tackling the AfD was a main aim.
“If we govern the country sensibly and don’t attack each other personally in the election campaign, we can push the AfD under 5 percent,” Seehofer said. However, while his party is behind Merkel in the election campaign he said it was sticking to its demand for a cap on the number of migrants coming here – a proposal which the chancellor has rejected.
In 2016, officially…. some 280,000 migrants arrived in Germany, a sharp drop compared with 890,000 the previous year. Bild said while there were no numbers for 2017 yet, the federal police had already caught more than 20,000 illegal migrants on the borders in the first three months of this year.
“right to bring in their family members, a revelation”
Well not really and this is being offered to asylum seekers not just in Germany but all across the west. The speed of the demographic change is so fast paced nothing can, nor it seems wants to stop it. ORDER15 again argues a change in direction. We appeal not to the masses But to those that are already awake already alarmed and willing to actively build a international, legal organisation that will work in the best interests of its members at the expense of the state and for the better meant of our kith & Kin.
Even before i got into Nationalism something like 20 years ago i knew of the Sumerians not from school of course but my early days of searching the web, So came as a total surprise and of keen interest to learn recently of the Danube culture.
An unexpected furor was caused by the exhibition in New York, “The Lost World of Old Europe”, wrote the New York Times. Long before the flourishing of Greece and Rome, even earlier than the first cities in Mesopotamia and Egypt, at the downstream of Danube River lived a nation ahead of its time in trade, arts and craftsmanship.
Many American specialized issues and daily newspapers point out that, during its efflorescence the “Old European” civilization had been one of the most advanced cultures in the world. In 1972, near Varna (Bulgaria) was discovered the Varna Necropolis and its priceless Chalcolithic treasure. Also in the Durankulak complex, which is a Neolithic settlement with 1200 graves was excavated the biggest prehistoric treasure in southeast Europe.
The people on the northwest Black Sea coast were a highly developed community, its traditions merging with the heritage of the Thracian ethno-cultural community and later the Ancient Greek civilizations, the oldest of them being the Mycenaean civilization (2700-1120 BC).
Douglas Bailey from the University of San Francisco writes the following in the exhibition’s catalogue: “The ability to build, use and understand symbolic objects, defines people as such. This capability unites us – the modern people – with the Neolithic people and Paleolithic artists”. Evidence of this are the golden, copper and ceramic bracelets, figurines and dishes.
According to Michel Louis Seferiad, an anthropologist in the French National Center for Scientific Research, these items are shrouded by ancient mysteries, cults and myths. Also in these lands were discovered the oldest written signs in the world.
The discoveries of Transylvania (Romania) and around Vinča (Serbia) are approximately of the same period. In addition, even older are the symbols on a small clay dish found in the village of Gradeshnitsa (Vratsa, Bulgaria). Their age is considered to be at least 6000 years.
In comparison we point out that the Sumerian script, until recently considered the oldest one, was created around 3100 BC. Due to the big popularity of the exhibition in the USA, now Europe also begins to notice these facts. New discoveries point out something really sensational: The Balkan area is the cradle of civilization, these lands were inhabited by a highly developed culture that is much older than the Mesopotamian civilization, says Deutsche Welle.
In his book “The mysteries of the Danube Civilization” Harald Haarmann proves that the Balkans were inhabited by the civilization that developed the first written language. Haarmann calls this culture“Old European”. It existed on the territories of modern-day Serbia, Macedonia, Bulgaria, Romania, Greece as well as parts of Ukraine and Hungary. According to archaeological discoveries, its emergence can be traced back to 7000 BC. Haarmann claims that words, which have hitherto been considered as Ancient Greek, are actually “Old European” and are still used today. Such examples are fireplace (камина, kamina), olive (маслина, maslina), ceramics (керамика, ceramica) metal (метал), hymn (химн) and others.
The Danube civilization arose 2000 years before that of the Sumerians.
Haarmann confirms what has long been known that the oldest gold in the world was found within the territory of modern-day Varna (Bulgaria). According to results from modern methods and techniques, it was made in 4500 BC, which means that it is 2000 years older than the famous Egyptian gold treasure.
Once again highlighting ethnic Europeans Long and unequalled legacy.
There is a crime being committed here in this city and across the nation. It is a crime that occurs daily and weekly, and by the month. It is a slow creeping crime that stares us in the face every day and rots the soul of our country, leaving us with something that we never expected or asked for, and certainly never voted for.
The United Nations definition of genocide includes the act of deliberately inflicting on a group, conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.
Remember that legal definition when you travel around this city and the towns and cities of our country. And remember it when you are being crowded out of your own cities and towns by an avalanche of foreigners and when our children have to compete for a place in school with the children of thousands of immigrants brought into our country in only the last 3 years.
These are precisely the conditions of life that qualify as a deliberate act of ethnic genocide under the 1948 genocide convention resolution 260.
Now, before I am shouted down with the usual tirade of racist abuse let me say I have nothing against the people who come here. They are for the most part only doing the best they can for themselves and their families. And if the situation were reversed I’m sure I would do all I could, to get myself and the rest of my family into India for example, so that I could take advantage of the wonderful society that the Indian people had created for themselves. So that I might be able to take advantage of all kinds of benefits the Indian people receive, like for example, free education, or free health care, or unemployment benefits, or a sickness benefit, or if I have an accident, compensation for injury. Or cheap government funded housing. Obviously, I would have to be a complete idiot to not try and get into India in any way I could, if the situation was reversed.
However the situation is not reversed, and it is our small nation of new Zealand that only recently past the four million mark that is being forced Fed an indigestible diet of people from parts of the world that have absolutely nothing in common with the European cultural heritage of new Zealand.
Rather, by beef is with our own government. The Key government has, without consultation or consideration of the will of the people, taken it upon itself, to act upon the same left wing liberal ideology that is currently laying waste to so much of Europe.
The usual thin threadbare and inadequate excuses will no longer pacify a New Zealand public that is sick to death of being ignored. We are told that we “need” immigration to provide all the skills required for our growing economy. Or simply that we need more “people” for the economy to grow. And of course, we must never question the Keynesian economic dogma of growth.
Even though now we have the immigrants, but where is the growth?
Even though now we have the immigrants, but where are the skills that justified their arrival?
Wake up People! We’ve been sold a pack of lies for a political agenda.
No government has ever been elected with a mandate to engage in social engineering on such a massive and far-reaching scale, based as it is, on a foreign and suicidal ideology.
There has never been a society or culture that has been able to withstand such massive racial mixing and yet still retain its cultural identity.
The problem here is that the ideological idiots in charge of New Zealand are so culturally bankrupt that they do not even consider that we even have a cultural identity in the first place.
And what I am here today to say is that we do!
The government does not even know what a country is, but we do.
And what I want to do today is send the government a message that the people are prepared to fight to preserve our culture and our country. The first action in this fight is the petition to reduce immigration numbers to 20000 per year with preference given to culturally compatible applicants. This is a common sense approach that would be considered completely normal in any non-white country.
So when the usual hysterical accusations come from the liberal left. We say clearly that we are a people and a country, and we will not be ignored.
Thank you for listening.
Macatak is member of Order15 In new Zealand if your interested to read more of Macatak thoughts you can check out his blog here hes actively looking for fellow members and supporters to build a reliable O15 network if your from NZ and interested do get in touch with him.
Occasionally I am asked when I left England. I reply that I never left England, England left me. It is difficult to pinpoint precisely when England first betrayed its peoples. Perhaps it was when the German cruise liner, MV Monte Rosa, seized in 1945 as prize-of-war, was used to ferry subsidised cheap labour to the UK from the Caribbean.
This betrayal coincided with the young people of post-war Britain being shipped out to Australia and New Zealand on £10 government sponsored passages. This concurred with Westminster offering subsidised visa-free guaranteed nationality to all arriving citizens of the British Commonwealth of Nations.
I saw Westminster’s malevolence again when on March 22 the outcome of their betrayal turned London Bridge blood red. I saw treason that same day when an English publisher’s ethnic-European wife was refused a UK visitor’s visa to visit her family in Britain.
Britain’s despicable governing elite lure destitute non-Europeans to England by waving a basket of unearned benefits under their noses. Simultaneously, this rotten to the core regime sniffily turns away a university educated schoolteacher who is well connected in the world of European culture. As a consequence, her British husband is exiled from the land of his birth.
The embittered ex-serviceman recalls an incident that occurred in a Lancashire Post Office. Inside stood a shuffling queue made up of mostly elderly Britons. Many pensioners will have endured a lifetime of hard work, survived World War II and suffered ration book austerity for eleven years after the war’s end. With careworn expressions these outcasts of the islands lined up to purchase stamps to pay their TV licence fees, electricity and gas bills. Their pensions are the second lowest in Europe.
An adjacent queue snaked out of the Post Office door and around the corner. As each economic migrant reached the specially assigned Post Office teller he or she collected a wad of banknotes. Each being of non-European appearance it is doubtful if any had family, ethnic or religious connections in Britain.
One beneficiary of Middle Eastern appearance triumphantly waved his wad of British banknotes in the air as he mocked the pensioners. Giving the two-fingered victory salute he screamed out, “F*** you, England.”
An elderly lady cowered. “Why doesn’t someone hit him?”
A gentleman tapped the pensioner’s shoulder: “If someone were to do so he would get two years for assault and his sentence doubled as it was a racially motivated assault.”
Some call this tolerance but most know in their hearts that it is base treachery.
Mike Walsh a supporter of ORDER15 an international journalist, author and broadcaster. If your interested you can find more of his writings here
Below is a short piece written in early 2015 describing how I became interested in political affairs.
In 2000 I was not a political animal at all. I was concerned in my life only with my own small circle of influence, my job, my life and my problems. I barely noticed the political world around me. To my way of thinking at the time, it was not something that affected me personally so why should I be interested, or more specifically; invest my valuable time and energy into something I could have no appreciable impact on in any case.
Then in November 2000 George W Bush was apparently ‘elected’, to the presidency of the United States. Elected of course was a misnomer that would become obvious in due course. This event was a kind of epiphany for me. Like out of the corner of my eye, I happened to notice that those weird Americans had decided to elect an orang-utan to the white house!
Remember this was pre 9-11, so the significance was not yet apparent, I merely noticed this strange event and assumed that in four years’ time they would recognise the error of their ways and correct their mistake,- and throw Bush out in the process.
Next stop; September 11, 2001, and all hell broke loose. Now we have an idiot in the white house, America under attack and a dangerous Neocon clique pulling all the strings.
Personally, if the election of Bush was the cause of a mild epiphany, then 9-11 was definitely the crossing of the Rubicon. For me, there was no turning back. The shock and horror at the events of 9-11 turned into a kind of morbid fascination with the ‘Bisaro’ world of US politics.
For those of us outside the cocoon of corporate America, the wall of lies and deceit was clear and obvious to those who would see. Yet in America, while there were many good people who stood up for truth, there were many more who shouted them down and accused them of “aiding the terrorists”.
For me, looking on from our island in the pacific it all looked just too much. Sad, insane, corrupt to the core. Above all it was clear, and ever more so as time went by, that those who were elected to represent and to lead, had been bought off and were neither representing or leading the people who elected them.
At the time, I did not know who they were serving. Perhaps their own narrow personal self-interest, or perhaps there was a wider dynamic at play motivating them to serve corporate power structures.
The well-known connection between Dick Cheney and Halliburton could also posit a profit motive for the invasion of Iraq. The wider military industrial complex stood to benefit from a massive profit bonanza, occasioned by on-going major military operations in the Middle East.
For the people involved, these reasons represented a powerful motive for war. Looking back now from our standpoint fourteen years later, it is obvious that the US government was taken over by a small group of Neocon elite.
What was not clear early on was the web of motivations behind the neocon ideology. One can look at the “Project for the New American Century – Rebuilding Americas Defences”, and come to the conclusion that their ideology may be flawed and full of bellicose hubris, but may still have had the best interests of America at heart.
But lets cut to the chase. The Zionist connection.
We can make excuses for these people all day long and look for good intentions and motives in their actions until the cows come home. But we delude ourselves, it’s simple. Their actions were illegal. I only became fully aware of the full depth of the Zionist connection between the Neocons in the Bush administration years later.
Ask who benefits. Israel is the answer. Perhaps one might suggest that there is merely a confluence of interests here. A product of coincidence, that what these neocons thought was good for America also just happened to be very good for Israel as well. A happy coincidence; what a pleasant surprise..!
Even this bankrupt ideology is a naïve self-delusion. The truth is worse than that.
The Americans seemed to be putting up with an awful lot. Denying what seemed to foreign observers to be a clear cut inside job.
But, to see things from their point of view; to put oneself in their shoes so to speak. What does one do when confronted by a reality, the implications of which are simply too horrible to contemplate.
It’s a self-defense mechanism; when confronted with facts that indicate that agents of a foreign power, have infiltrated your government, and subjugated your domestic and foreign policy to the service of that foreign power. And when doing that, thousands of your own citizens and thousands of your own armed forces personnel and incomprehensibly huge sums of money have been spent, wasted, squandered and murdered, then we do the only thing a sane mind can do,… we don’t believe it!
So this is about my philosophical and intellectual journey. It has become pretty clear to me that the future prosperity of all nations has become intimately linked to this small basket of issues that affect us all. The task for those who have woken up to the danger already is to wake up the rest, one man at a time. And if we each do our job, the spread of awareness will grow exponentially. Call it what you will, zionist, communists or just left wing liberals, or perhaps some dark and shadowy figures planning a New World Order. The future is not carved in stone. We can fail and allow a new dark age of slavery and servitude to cover the globe or we can succeed and herald in an age of prosperity that our ancestors could only dream of.
Macatak is member of Order15 In new Zealand if your interested to read more of Macatak thoughts you can check out his blog here hes actively looking for fellow members and supporters to build a reliable O15 network if your from NZ and interested do get in touch with him.
But in spite of it all, women today are actually less happy than their ancestors whom the feminists perceive as having been “oppressed,” and furthermore, many are becoming increasingly unstable, violent, and toxic as they poison themselves with the toxic ideology that is feminism.
The following points will show how feminism actually damages today’s women rather than help them.
1. They hold onto so much anger and hate
If feminism is so great, why are most feminists so angry and miserable?
Women infected by feminism hold so much anger that it is etched onto their faces. In fact, spewing hatred for men seems to be the only thing that makes them feel good about their own empty lives. It’s no wonder they like to come to our website to spew some of the most hideous insults, violent threats, and rampant sexist verbal abuse for merely having different opinions.
2. They blame men for all their problems
Women are strong and independent according to feminists. But that’s until when it’s time to blame men for all their personal and social problems. Since they feel entitled to have men behave the way they want them to and cater to all their needs, it’s natural that the “misogynists” should be scapegoated if anything goes wrong their own lives. Feminism, not so ironically, seems to erase women’s sense of internal locus of control.
3. They don’t respect themselves
Modern women barely even respect themselves. They are careless with their life choices, indulge in destructive hedonism of alcohol and sex, go out of their way to purposely destroy their looks, and so on. Yet, they expect men to offer them unconditional respect just because they’re born women. You don’t deserve respect because you’re a loud-mouthed feminist, you have to earn it like everyone else.
4. They embrace being disgusting
Feminism teaches women that femininity is sexist and oppressive, so it’s no surprise that many young women today are purposely making themselves look ugly and behave in a disgusting manner just to shock and offend people to get a reaction. It seems that even though they want to avoid whatever misogynistic standards that they perceive as being forced on them, they still can’t help but to engage in the female hobby of attention-whoring.
5. They try too hard to act like men
Women today are confused as they are pressured to go against their feminine nature to behave as men do. Instead of embracing the gift of their feminine qualities and their roles as wives and mothers, women today are trying too hard to usurp the male roles in the name of equality. Of course, this play-acting can only lead to inner suffering as their deviancy corrodes their emotional health.
6. They love outrage reading
Feminists are vain and insecure as well as loving drama. This is why they must constantly engage in outrage reading to entertain themselves. The more they read “misogynistic” stories and articles, the more vindicated they feel about their own miserable lives. They need a scapegoat to dump their emotional baggage on after being swindled by the lies of feminism.
7. They live a life of contradictions
Women are strong and capable, but they are perpetual victims who need government protection. Women want to be beautiful and garner attention, but they want to avoid being “objectified.” They preach about equality for women, but they still want all the privileges that come with being a women. These are just few of many contradictions that women must juggle with as ideology battles biology for dominance in their fickle minds. It’s no wonder they’re so crazy.
8. They don’t have children
It’s women’s biological function to have children. The fact that many women today are barren because they sold their souls to education and career makes them miserable as they are fighting their biology to live a life that is unnatural. And with every criticism, they’ll scream louder and louder to drown out the ticking sound of their biological clock.
9. They spend their entire lives pretending
Modern women pretend to be capable, they pretend to be strong, they pretend that they’re not offended, they pretend they’re happy, they pretend they’re in control, they pretend they’re not sluts, they pretend they’re a good person, they pretend they know what they’re doing with their lives, and this goes on and on. All this pretending is taking on toll on their lives and the only way they know how to cover it is by pretending even more.
10. They don’t have any standards
In a feminist world, all women are “beautiful” no matter what. So it begs the question: is there actually such thing as an ugly woman or is calling every single woman “beautiful” a way of living in a pretend world to preserve their egos? If a person told me that a hangover vomit was just as delicious as a cheese cake and that I shouldn’t be so judgmental, I would declare that person severely ill in the head. But this is exactly how thousands of feminism-infected women go about with their lives, describing fat, short-haired, tattooed girls who look deranged as “beautiful.”
11. They do too much alcohol and drugs
With women today drinking just as much as men while doing other drugs both prescription and illicit, it’s no wonder that more and more of them are becoming unstable and crazy. Are we really to believe that a cocktail of vodka, birth control pills, antidepressants, and other chemicals will not lead to devastating hormonal and mental health consequences for today’s women?
12. Their egos are bloated
A privileged Western feminist in essence.
With the society inflating their egos far beyond their true value, it’s no surprise to see women with extremely entitled and bratty attitudes who expect the world to deliver whatever it is that they cry for. This is why you’ll see grown up women throwing tantrums like children when they don’t get things their way.
13. They have unrealistic life expectations
Women are bombarded with lavish lifestyles shown on television and magazines that they seem to expect them as being normal. All women want the perfect man, the perfect career, the perfect combination of clothes, the perfect house, the perfect wedding, the perfect life. And if you ask them what they’ll do to achieve all that, they’ll give you a dumbfounded look. They’re women—they expect all of it to be delivered to them on a silver platter. They’re not supposed to make the effort.
14. They are short-sighted
Feminism fused with consumerism to tell women that they can have it all and right now. Women today rarely think ahead and seem to believe that they’ll perpetually live the life they had in their peak years of teens and early 20’s. They sun tan obsessively because it signals status, but they don’t care that it will make them look a decade older in the future. They slut around thinking that they should have all the fun they can have, but they end up destroying their ability to pair-bond. They spend all their money on frivolous objects like their 20th pair of shoes, but they never save up. Women never think ahead because they expect everything to work out and be saved from consequences.
15. They are vain
Modern women drown in their own vanity with depth that has no end. Women constantly post pictures of themselves on Facebook, Instagram, and Tinder to fish for ‘Like’s and compliments. They are absolute whores who can’t get enough of the attention they are given by all the desperate simps. Their vanity distorts their perception about themselves and turns them into narcissistic demons.
16. They are too pampered
Western women grow up with such privileged conditions that they suck off their daddy’s money to live lavishly while criticizing men for oppressing them at the same time. The disease of feminism has made them blind to their own paradoxes. This is also why you have so many adult women acting like spoiled children.
17. They’ve been conditioned to seek bad boys
Women today are never happy with their relationship with men because they constantly seek bad boys with dark triad traits only to get hurt and take their anger out on other ordinary men. This is what happens when you allow women to have sexual freedom in a feminist culture. How many children are growing up without a father because of bad decisions made by their lousy mothers?
18. Male feminists and white knights give them unconditional support
Loser male feminists and white knights constantly defend women no matter what and end up warping the worldview of those said women. These pathetic men are the enablers of women’s worst behaviors who encourage women to show even greater contempt for men.
19. They are slaves to corporations and governments
You can tell the feminists millions times that women are happier at home raising children and they’ll just snap at you in anger to deny the truth. No matter how stressed and miserable they are, women will always defend their corporate and government jobs like how some abused women defend their domineering husbands. This is the power of feminist indoctrination.
20. They don’t know what to do with their “freedom”
They tried drinking and partying until blacking out, they blew cash to go shopping every weekend, they tried traveling to exotic locations to take photos for everyone to see on Facebook, they fucked various men they barely know and cheated on their boyfriends for fun, they got their useless diploma by taking out a loan they’ll never be able to pay off, they bought their Lululemon outfit and tried hot yoga, they decided to hop on the feminist wagon to feel empowered and to hate on men.
But no matter what, they still feel miserable and still feel like they need to “find” themselves. It’s as if the more freedom women are given, the unhappier they get. They jump here and there for momentary pleasures, but they can’t seem to find any meaning in life because they simply refuse to live like a woman. They bought into the feminist lies and now they are hollow beings drifting around in our modern world, constantly searching, constantly blaming, constantly dissatisfied.
None of the above wouldn’t be so bad if it were just these women who are facing the consequences brought upon by their actions. But no. We as a society must all pay—especially us, the men. Men must work like mules to finance women’s frivolous lifestyles, men must try their best to normalize sex relationships to start and maintain stable families, men must pay taxes so that women can live off of government benefits, men must modify their behaviors so that women don’t feel “offended” or “harassed” in any way, and should our society fail, it will again be the men who will have to defend women and rebuild everything.
Feminism is destroying womanhood, and therefore, family and society, and it is only the men who are capable of putting a stop to this rabid sickness.
I first learned about the Waffen SS veteran’s parade in Riga, Latvia about two years ago while researching for another trip to Germany. I had never heard of the celebration before, which came as a surprise considering I’ve been heavily involved in Nationalism since 1999.
After some planning and pleas throughout social media for Waffen SS Veterans contacts in Latvia, we came up empty. Despite the setbacks, however, we booked our trip and set off for the Baltic Nation. I travelled to Riga, back in 2006 and from what I recall, I wasn’t impressed. with Riga’s old town; not nearly as impressive as the city of Tallinn, in neighboring Estonia. The only outstanding memories were when the bar staff ripped us off and the sight of elderly pensioners everywhere begging on their knees in the middle of streets.
I arrived on the evening of the March 14th; two days before the parade. It was starting to get dark, so I took a quick walk outside to look around and find some food. It only took a few moments to realize that I had never seen this part of the old town before. I was surprised to find a Stockmann department store, which is similar to Harrod’s of Nordic Europe; these stores are excellent, and their food halls are world class. I was pleased to find a variety of quality items for purchase. As I walked throughout the city, I couldn’t help but notice how attractive and well-dressed the people were. With a new perspective, I came to appreciate the city in a way I hadn’t before.
The following day our small party banded together early in the morning for some general sightseeing, as well as to gather our thoughts in preparation for the parade. For a country as small as Latvia, there is an impressive amount of things to see and do. I didn’t notice the first time I was there, but I the area was in good shape; on par with any of the Nordic countries in regards to cleanliness and architecture.
also noticeably free of non-whites; perhaps we saw as few as six throughout our three-day visit. Refreshingly, the Latvian women were attractive, pleasant, and feminine.
When we stopped for directions or recommendation, it would always turn into laughter, friendly banter, and enjoyable chit chat.
Every Latvian we spoke with understood and spoke English and the Latvian girls, without exception, radiated happiness; they were confident and content as they went about their day – the polar opposite of the majority of women in the western nations.
The morning of the parade, we agreed to meet at 9 am; coincidentally the march started outside our hotel after a short church service in the adjoining building. As soon as we stepped out of the hotel, we were not greeted by fellow Nationalists, but rather hundreds, if not thousands of riot police standing in groups on the street corners. Adding to the intimidation, they brought their mobile street cameras. We couldn’t see anyone that might fit the description of either a Waffen SS veteran or a Nationalist, so we decided to circle the old town; becoming unnerved by the heavy police presence. we decided to abandon our plans to distribute ORDER15 stickers, and flyers.
An hour passed before a steady stream of Veterans and Nationalists, each carrying flowers and National flags of their respective countries, began to appear. Around 10:30, the press appeared pointing their cameras at us and just about anything else that moved in the area. It was at this moment a few degenerate far left extremists turned up attempting to create trouble, but much to our surprise and approval, the riot police were quick to removed them. We then realized that the Latvian police are there to protect their citizens and allow peaceful events, as opposed to the police in our respective western European Nations, which actually protect and aids the violent demonstrators.
You can find us in at about 2 minutes 90 seconds
Around 11 am organizers and members of Latvia’s leading ethno-Nationalist political party, National Alliance, invited us to attend the parade and gave us Latvian Ribbons for display our jackets. As we set off, it was remarkably peaceful and very well attended. There were what looked like to us 300 people, but it was difficult to determine later we found out from RT the march was attended by over 1500 people. With a family-orientated feel to the March, it was nice to witness various spontaneous outbreaks of patriotic singing, people straining to take pictures, and the abundance of smiling, waving, happy people. It was something I’ve never witnessed before of any Nationalist activity; in all honesty, it was quite a surreal feeling.
After walking maybe one and a half km, we approached the Freedom Monument in the center of Riga, on the edges of the old town. We found ourselves flanked on both sides by a thick wall of riot police who notably had their backs to us watching for trouble. In the UK, Sweden, and other Western Nations, the police face the Nationalists and turn their backs to the troublemakers. Also, we found an equally thick line of Latvian Nationalists holding Latvian flags; much like a guard of Honor. As we edged closer to the National Monument, we heard singing and saw Representatives of the church overseeing the laying of flowers at which point Latvian girls came forward into the crowd and offered flowers to those who did not have them already. Each of us, in turn, laid our flowers and paused for a moments reflection and remembrance of the great men of the Waffen SS who had so courageously and selflessly risked everything, and in many cases, the ultimate sacrificed all for the continued survival of not only their folk, but for all of Europe.
We decided we should wait around on the sidelines and try to make contact with anyone that might look like they could help us with making contact with the organizers.
First, a student newspaper approached me and I agreed to do a short interview – my first for ORDER15. After the interview, a few of us took the opportunity to approach some of the Waffen SS who were waiting to give press interviews. After some light conversation, we were able to get some photos with them; much to our delight.
Not long after, some Latvian girls approached us and asked if we would take their picture in front of the Freedom Monument. A good opportunity, we struck up a conversation, which led to us finding out they were a part of the National Alliance, the group that organized the event. We were quickly invited back to their party headquarters with the intention of possibly getting us a ride to the Waffen SS cemetery for further ceremonies. On arriving at the National Alliance Headquarters, we noticed the majority of people were under 35, well-dressed and organized; it felt like a department of a National Government.
Unfortunately after some waiting, we were informed that we would not be able to attend as people book months ahead for these seats and there were not enough left for all of us. We thanked them for their efforts, and as we exchanged contact information, they invited to come back next year. After returning to our hotel for a few hours, we re-grouped at a restaurant to eat, relax, and recount the day’s events.
To sum up the experience, it was very well-organized and free from all, but minor trouble; the arrests where of the left, which didn’t hinder any of the Nationalists attending. With each passing year, the numbers of Waffen SS Veterans become fewer. We must take the oportunity to attend while we still can these annual parade’s to honor the few brave Veterans we have left.
YOU have the chance to attend a world-class, legal celebration of the only true war heroes of the last century. By attending and swelling the ranks of the people that march in this parade, you are showing the world that you care about their sacrifice; the sacrifice made for everyone of European heritage. You have an invaluable opportunity to walk side by side with the Waffen SS and ethno-Nationalists, proudly and smartly
Latvia, in our opinion, raised the bar and set the standard. If you are seriously interested to find out how to emulate their example and attend as part of ORDER15, then get in touch.
From a nationalist point of view google has always been the enemy, in league with facebook, coca cola, Mc donalds and all the other monolithic anti west corporations but as its tentacles spread into our daily lives it’s not just nationalists that should be worried.
Larry Page, one of Google’s two co-founders, once said off-handedly that Google is not about building a search engine. As he said it, “Oh, we’re really making an AI”. Google right now is all about building the world brain that will take care of every person, all the time and everywhere.
By 2030, Google will have that World Brain in existence, and it will look after all of us. And that’s quite possibly both the best and worst thing that could happen to humanity.
To explain that claim, let me tell you a story of how your day is going to unfold in 2030.
2030 – A Google World
You wake up in the morning, January 1st, 2030. It’s freezing outside, but you’re warm in your room. Why? Because Nest – your AI-based air conditioner – knows exactly when you need to wake up, and warms the room you’re in so that you enjoy the perfect temperature for waking up.
You go out to the street and order an autonomous taxi to take you to your workplace. Who programmed that autonomous car? Google did. Who acquired Waze – a crowdsourcing navigation app? That’s right: Google did.
After lunch, you take a stroll around the block, with your Google Glass 2.0 on your eyes. Your smart glasses know it’s a cold day, and they know you like hot cocoa, and they also know that there’s a cocoa store just around the bend which your friends have recommended before. So it offers to take you there – and if you agree, Google earns a few cents out of anything you buy in the store. And who invented Google Glass…? I’m sure you get the picture.
I can go on and on, but the basic idea is that the entire world is going to become connected in the next twenty years. Many items will have sensors in and on them, and will connect to the cloud. And Google is not only going to produce many of these sensors and appliances (such as the Google Assistant, autonomous cars, Nest, etc.) but will also assign a digital assistant to every person, that will understand the user better than that person understands himself.
I probably don’t have to explain why the Google World Brain will make our lives much more pleasant. The perfect coordination and optimization of our day-to-day dealings will ensure that we need to invest less resources (energy, time, concentration) to achieve a high level of life quality. I see that primarily as a good thing.
So what’s the problem?
Here’s the thing: the digital world suffers from what’s called “The One Winner Effect”. Basically it means that there’s only place for one great winner in every sector. So there’s only one Facebook – the second largest social media network in English is Twitter, with only ~319 million users. That’s nothing compared to Facebook’s 1.86 billion users. Similarly, Google controls ~65% of the online search market. That’s a huge number when you realize that competitors like Yahoo and Bing – large and established services – control most of the rest ~35%. So again, one big winner.
So what’s the problem, you ask? Well, a one-winner market tends to create soft monopolies, in which one company can provide the best services, and so it’s just too much of a hassle to leave for other services. Google is creating such a soft monopoly. Imagine how difficult it will be for you to wake up tomorrow morning and migrate your e-mail address to one of the competitors, transfer all of your Google Docs there, sell your Android-based (Google’s OS!) smartphone and replace it with an iPhone, wake up cold in the morning because you’ve switched Nest for some other appliance that hasn’t had the time to learn your habits yet, etc.
Can you imagine yourself doing that? I’m sure some ardent souls will, but most of humanity doesn’t care deeply enough, or doesn’t even have the options to stop using Google. How do you stop using Google, when every autonomous car on the street has a Google Camera? How do you stop using Google, when your website depends on Google not banning it? How do you stop using Google when practically every non-iPhone smartphone relies on an Android operating system? This is a Google World.
And Google knows it, too.
Google Flexes it’s Muscles
Recently, around 200 people got banned from using Google services because they cheated Google by reselling the Pixel smartphone. Those people woke up one morning, and found out they couldn’t log into their Gmail, that they couldn’t acess their Google Docs, and if they were living in the future – they would’ve probably found out they can’t use Google’s autonomous cars and other apps on the street. They were essentially sentenced to a digital death.
Now, public uproar caused Google to back down and revive those people’s accounts, but this episode shows you the power that Google are starting to amass. And what’s more, Google doesn’t have to ban people in such direct fashion. Imagine, for example, that your Nationalist themed website is being demoted by Google’s search engine (which nobody knows how it works) simply because you’re talking the type of politics Google doesn’t like, or speaking out against google itself, google is allowed by law to do that. So who’s going to stand up and talk smack about Google? Not order15, that’s for sure. ORDER15 Loves Google.
To sum things up, Google is not required by law to serve everyone, or even to be ‘fair’ in its recommendations about services or be politically neutral. And as it gathers more power and becomes more prevalent in our daily lives, we will need to find mechanisms to ensure that Google or Google-equivalent services are provided to everyone, to prevent nationalists being left outside the system, and to enable nationalists to keep being able to speak up against the corrupt anti west, western states.
So in conclusion, it’s going to be a Google world, and ORDER15 Loves Google. Now please share this answer, since I’m not sure Google will!
It might look like an unassuming rabbit hole, but this tunnel leads to a stunning network of caves dating back 700 years.
The caves are hidden less than a metre beneath a farmer’s field in Shropshire and were used by followers of the Knights Templar, a medieval religious order that fought in the Crusades. Knights Templar is an organisation that’s inspired many nationalists because of the bravery and purity of the knights, who protected Christian pilgrims in the Holy Land. An order we as ORDER15 should try to emulate in many ways, not least their selfless dedication to their faith and folk.
The order was founded at the height of the Dark Ages and was given space on the Temple Mount above the ruins of King Solomon’s Temple in Jerusalem.
The order attracted new members from all over Europe, before it was disbanded by Pope Clement V, in 1312. Some people continue to believe the knights simply went underground and to this day harbor a secret that could topple the Catholic Church.
Photographer Michael Scott, from Birmingham, ventured beneath ground to witness them for himself.
The 33-year-old said: “I traipsed over a field to find it, but if you didn’t know it was there you would just walk right past it.
“It’s probably less than a metre underground, so it’s more into the field than under it.
“Considering how long it’s been there it’s in amazing condition, it’s like an underground temple.”
The tunnel leads to a network of walkways and beautifully carved arches.
Scott added the cave was quite cramped and those nearing six feet tall would have to bend down to fit in.
He said: “I had to crouch down and once I was in it was completely silent.
“There were a few spiders in there but that was it. It was raining so the slope down was quite sludgy but inside the cave was bone dry.”
How should a White European respond to the charge of Racism, a charge made simply at the suggestion that he might want to stand up for, and defend the right of his people to exist?
How sad it is that this is even a relevant question in 2017. But after 70 years of deliberate “population replacement“, and the slow and steady march of cultural Marxism through the western world, culminating in the Zionist pièce de résistance of mass forced immigration into the European nations, it is hardly surprising that we are a little confused.
Is it not a basic pre-requisite for our elected leaders to secure the welfare of the people?
This basic assumption is so utterly fundamental to the first principles of government that it has never been deemed necessary to even question our candidates as to whether they even like the people or the country they are standing for. Yet we have been treated recently to theappalling spectacle of one European leader after another speaking about their own people in the lowest terms of contempt. Whilst at the same time pretending that the savage hordes of African and Arab invaders are poor refugee “children”. And that we have an obligation to accept these people on the basis that;
We are privileged white Europeans and we have a moral obligation to open our doors to the less fortunate peoples of the world.
We must open our borders because we need more people to provide for the labour demands of our growing economy.
We must admit hundreds of thousands of foreign men because our birth rates are too low.
Each one of these spurious pretensions is thrown up one after another by our governments in an attempt to quench the fires that are beginning to burn ever more ferociously in the hearts and minds of our people, as the realisation dawns on more and more of us that our governments have abrogated their responsibility in the most diabolical of ways. It is our genocide that they seek.
They would not see it that way, and certainly would not call it by that name, but genocide it is none the less.
The United Nations definition of Genocide.
The United Nations Genocide Convention defines it as “acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group”
Article 2 of the convention defines genocide as
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
— Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Article 2
Clearly, the ones making the allegation of Racism are themselves the racists. If Racism is the attempt to subjugate a given group on the basis of Race alone then those who seek to promote or defend Multiculturalism are practising Racism.
This is clear from the fact that while they may use the somewhat benign sounding word “Multiculturalism”, the methods and principles they are using to implement it are clearly genocidal.
Specifically, referencing the UN definition cited above.
Point a) Killing members of the group; The promotion of abortion as an acceptable practice in European countries kills millions of babies every year. There were 1.06 million abortions in the US in 2011. And In Europe, around 30 percent of pregnancies end in abortion. Point b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; The genocide of Europeans has not reached this level on a wide scale yet, at least not in Europe. However, the situation in South Africa is a lot worse. Since the ANC came to power in 1994 more than 70,000 White farmers have been murdered.
Point C ) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; The key phrase here is ‘conditions of life’, conditions such as poverty, deprivation, hunger and displacement. Relative to the state of European existence 50 years ago, these things have happened to a greater or lesser extent in many parts of the white world.
In the same vein, conditions of life are also defined by the state of the institutions that define our way of life; Political, Religious, Educational and social, ie news media and entertainment.
We have seen in the entire Western/European world, the long march of Cultural Marxism through all these pillars of our white European culture. Cultural Marxism has been applied through the application of Critical Theory; a theory which in practice is no theory at all. It is simply the practice of endlessly criticising any given idea or principle with the intent only to tear down and destroy.
This is entirely in keeping with a Marxist-Communist ideology which demands the total destruction of society in order to herald in the new Communist workers’ paradise.
Point D ) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; The promotion of abortion as well as the promotion of homosexuality and lesbianism. These things do not happen by accident. There is a deliberate and explicit connection between these things and the deliberate attempt to denigrate and obliterate the white European people.
Point E) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group. As far as I know this has not happened. The thrust of the attack against Europeans is to either stop us from being born or kill us outright. Simply transferring our children to other groups will not do.
The implicit Racism of the Liberals against the European majority finds expression in the educational system where the implementation of politically correct educational standards, affirmative action and social engineering in Education conspire to weaken and disenfranchise the dominant culture. The lack of what is no longer taught is just as dangerous as what is now taught in its place.
The fact that what is not taught is the kind of history and values of our people that made our societies the envy of the world and produced the highest level of art, science and culture in recorded history is completely overlooked by the ideologically driven liberals who seek to create ostensibly well balanced, weak, meek and obedient carbon copy versions of themselves.
Their radical egalitarianism will fail because it’s wrong. We are not all equal and life is not fair. They may succeed in legislating equal input and opportunity in education but they will never succeed in legislating equal outcomes. All they can do is attempt to mask their failure by lowering the bar for everyone. They favour the stupid at the expense of the smart, promote the morally deviant to the detriment of the moral and honourable, and handicap the strong and the fast so that the slow and the week can feel good about themselves.
These things have not happened in a vacuum, the destruction of our Christian culture would not have happened if that destruction had not been deliberately promoted. The same goes for our educational system which now sees its role more as a moulder of attitudes and creator of compliant peons to work at the wheels of the of the Zionist controlled new world order. Our political institutions are also deeply infected with the same liberal ideology. Governments no longer see the defence of the people and the integrity of the country as their primary role. They are now the primary change agents in the international push to obliterate white identity as a unique and distinct race among the peoples of the earth.
I do believe the mask, however, is slipping. And when it falls the evil intent of all the diabolical programmes of the Frankfurt school will be revealed for all to see. Cultural Marxism and critical theory, with all their inflated pseudo-intellectualism, will be finally seen as the philosophical frauds that they are and then consigned in short order back to the trash from whence they came.
Macatak is member of Order15 In new Zealand if your interested to read more of Macatak thoughts you can check out his blog here hes actively looking for fellow members and supporters to build a reliable O15 network if your from NZ and interested do get in touch with him.