Sweden shrugged off dire predictions of mass die-offs from COVID-19 and did not shut down their entire economy and society, and now their response has been proven correct while the rest of the world stumbled into mass hysteria.
Why is the media so fixated on Sweden’s coronavirus policy? What difference does it make?
Sweden settled on a policy that they thought was both sustainable and would save as many lives as possible. They weren’t trying to ‘show anyone up’ or ‘prove how smart they were’. They simply took a more traditionalist approach that avoided a full-scale lockdown. That’s all.
But that’s the problem, isn’t it? And that’s why Sweden has been so harshly criticized in the far left state medias, because they refused to do what everyone else was doing. They refused to adopt a policy that elites now universally support, a policy that scares people into cowering submission. The Swedish model is a threat to that approach because it allows people to maintain their personal freedom even in the midst of a global pandemic. Ruling class elites don’t want that, that is not in their interests. What they want is for the people to meekly accept the rules and conditions that lead to their eventual enslavement. That’s the real objective, complete social control, saving lives has nothing to do with it. Sweden opposed that approach which why they have or have been allowed to is any ones guess Sweden is famous for its Socialism and conformity so it is interesting to say the least that they have gone against the grain here but perhaps its been used as a guinea pig of sorts as is the case historically with social engineering.
Of course, none of this has anything to do with Sweden’s fatality rate, which is higher than some and lower than others. (Sweden has 543 deaths per million, which means roughly 1 death in every 2,000 people.) But like every other country, the vast majority of Swedish fatalities are among people 70 years and older with underlying health conditions. (“90% of the country’s deaths have been among those over 70.”) Sweden was not successful in protecting the people in its elderly care facilities, so large numbers of them were wiped out following the outbreak. Sweden failed in that regard and they’ve admitted they failed. Even so, the failures of implementation do not imply that the policy is wrong. Quite the contrary. Sweden settled on a sustainable policy, that keeps the economy running, preserves an atmosphere of normality, and exposes its young, low-risk people to the infection, thus, moving the population closer to the ultimate goal of “herd immunity”.
Presently, Sweden is very close to reaching herd immunity which is a condition in which the majority have developed antibodies that will help to fend-off similar sars-covid infections in the future. Absent a vaccine, herd immunity is the best that can be hoped for. It ensures that future outbreaks will be less disruptive and less lethal. Take a look at this excerpt from an article at the Off-Guardian which helps to explain what’s really going on:
“Sweden’s health minister understood that the only chance to beat COVID-19 was to get the Swedish population to a Herd Immunity Threshold against COVID-19, and that’s exactly what they have done…
The Herd Immunity Threshold (“HIT”) for COVID-19 is between 10-20%
This fact gets less press than any other. Most people understand the basic concept of herd immunity and the math behind it. In the early days, some public health officials speculated that COVID-19’s HIT was 70%. Obviously, the difference between a HIT of 70% and a HIT of 10-20% is dramatic, and the lower the HIT, the quicker a virus will burn out as it loses the ability to infect more people, which is exactly what COVID-19 is doing everywhere, including the U.S, which is why the death curve above looks the way it looks.
Scientists from Oxford, Virginia Tech, and the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, all recently explained the HIT of COVID-19 in this paper:
We searched the literature for estimates of individual variation in propensity to acquire or transmit COVID-19 or other infectious diseases and overlaid the findings as vertical lines in Figure 3. Most CV estimates are comprised between 2 and 4, a range where naturally acquired immunity to SARS-CoV-2 may place populations over the herd immunity threshold once as few as 10-20% of its individuals are immune….
Naturally acquired herd immunity to COVID-19 combined with earnest protection of the vulnerable elderly – especially nursing home and assisted living facility residents — is an eminently reasonable and practical alternative to the dubious panacea of mass compulsory vaccination against the virus.
This strategy was successfully implemented in Malmo, Sweden, which had few COVID-19 deaths by assiduously protecting its elder care homes, while “schools remained open, residents carried on drinking in bars and cafes, and the doors of hairdressers and gyms were open throughout.
One of the most vocal members of the scientific community discussing COVID-19’s HIT is Stanford’s Nobel-laureate Dr. Michael Levitt. Back on May 4, he gave this great interview to the Stanford Daily where he advocated for Sweden’s approach of letting COVID-19 spread naturally through the community until you arrive at HIT. He stated:
If Sweden stops at about 5,000 or 6,000 deaths, we will know that they’ve reached herd immunity, and we didn’t need to do any kind of lockdown. My own feeling is that it will probably stop because of herd immunity. COVID is serious, it’s at least a serious flu. But it’s not going to destroy humanity as people thought.
Guess what? That’s exactly what happened. As of today, 7 weeks after his prediction, Sweden has 5,550 deaths. In this graph, you can see that deaths in Sweden PEAKED when the HIT was halfway to its peak (roughly 7.3%) and by the time the virus hit 14% it was nearly extinguished.” (“Second wave? Not even close“, JB Handley, The Off-Guardian)
In other words, Sweden is rapidly approaching the endgame which means that restrictions can be dropped entirely and normal life can resume. They will have maintained their dignity and freedom while the rest of the world hid under their beds for months on end. They won’t have to reopen their primary schools because they never shut them down to begin with. Numerous reports indicate that young children are neither at risk nor do they pass the virus to others. Most Americans don’t know this because the propaganda media has omitted the news from their coverage. Here’s a clip from the National Review which helps to explain:
Kari Stefansson, CEO of the Icelandic company deCODE genetics in Reykjavík, studied the spread of COVID-19 in Iceland with Iceland’s Directorate of Health and the National University Hospital. His project has tested 36,500 people; as of this writing,
Children under 10 are less likely to get infected than adults and if they get infected, they are less likely to get seriously ill. What is interesting is that even if children do get infected, they are less likely to transmit the disease to others than adults. We have not found a single instance of a child infecting parents.” (“Icelandic Study: ‘We Have Not Found a Single Instance of a Child Infecting Parents.’“, National Review)
This is just one of many similar reports from around the world. Most of the schools in Europe have already reopened and lifted restrictions on distancing and masks. Meanwhile, in the US, the reopening of schools has become another contentious political issue pitting Trump against his Democrat adversaries who are willing to sacrifice the lives of schoolchildren to prevent the president from being reelected. It’s a cynical-counterproductive approach that reveals the vindictiveness of the people who support it. In an election year, everything is politics. (Watch Tucker Carlson’s short segment on “Kids cannot afford to stay locked down.“)
Here’s a question for you: Have you ever wondered why the virus sweeps through the population and then seemingly dissipates and dies out? In fact, the virus doesn’t simply die-out, it runs out of people to infect. But how can that be when only 1 of 7 people will ever contract the virus?
The answer is immunity, either natural immunity or built up immunity from other Sars-Covid exposure. Here’s more from the Off Guardian piece:
“Scientists are now showing evidence that up to 81% of us can mount a strong response to COVID-19 without ever having been exposed to it before:
Cross-reactive SARS-CoV-2 T-cell epitopes revealed preexisting T-cell responses in 81% of unexposed individuals, and validation of similarity to common cold human coronaviruses provided a functional basis for postulated heterologous immunity.
This alone could explain WHY the Herd Immunity Threshold (HIT) is so much lower for COVID-19 than some scientists thought originally, when the number being talked about was closer to 70%. Many of us have always been immune!“ (“Second wave? Not even close”, JB Handley, The Off-Guardian)
It at least appears that Fauci and the far left state medias have been lying to us the whole time. and that perhaps Covid-19 is not a totally new virus for which humans have no natural immunity or built-in protection. Covid is a derivative of other infections which is why the death toll isn’t alot higher.
Traditionalists generally distrust the state at the best of times but increasingly it appears that this virus is being used and nurtured for political gain even the more docile among us has questioned why in the midst of a supposed pandemic so many western governments would allow and then even help organise BLM riots. One thing is for certain the draconian measures and constant back tracking and inconsistent / conflicting statements put out by far-left national leaders is causing a serious economic crisis the likes we haven’t seen for generations There is a virus, people are dying and one should use common sense in response but there is perhaps no greater killer in the modern world than poverty.
UK Ministry of Defense 2010: “Choosing to be disconnected may be considered suspicious”
Traditionalists and indeed everyone on the true conservative right have understood for sometime that the corporate and state level attacks on privacy is becoming a greater and greater threat to us all. Political dissident or not everyone is being targeted. Brigadier General Robert S. Spalding said in a 2019 interview that humans will not be able to opt out of the pervasive 5G system:
A sobering reality has emerged since this report was published. The infrastructure for this system of control has been built.
The 5G network will enable the rollout of a vast command and control grid that will monitor people, places and things wirelessly in real-time. Humans will not have the ability to opt out and live a normal life.
The Internet of Things (IoT) infrastructure will be organized by the 5G network. Trillions of objects made “smart” by embedded computer chips will be “alive” in the grid.
In 2012, CIA Director David Petraeus said that the technology will be “transformational… particularly to their effect on clandestine tradecraft“. Petraeus explained:
Items of interest will be located, identified, monitored, and remotely controlled through technologies such as radio-frequency identification, sensor networks, tiny embedded servers, and energy harvesters – all connected to the next-generation internet using abundant, low-cost, and high-power computing.
The virtual networks will consist of communications servers linking individuals and objects, many of which will be networked through individual Internet Protocol (IP) addresses.
Ultimately, as stated in the paper, it may become difficult to “turn the outside world off,” and “…Even amongst those who make an explicit life-style choice to remain detached, choosing to be disconnected may be considered suspicious behaviour.”
As coronavirus accelerates trends toward automation through robotics and artificial intelligence, rapid adoption of 5G can be expected as well.
The monumental shift to this anti-human/Marxist system appears for the most part to be going unchallenged and with it comes a very real danger of making every dissident cause Left or Right thereafter far more difficult to champion. Who will be willing to go out onto the streets and protest the shut down of a company or hospital or some such public services, who will be willing to demonstrate the rise in university fees, child grooming gangs, the banning of this or that when everyone attending will be instantly recognised by the state and have the attendance added to their file/profile A profile of which likely as in China, to be accessed by employers, banks, and state agencies.
Highlighting/fighting Big brother issues have long been the play thing of the far-left but this effects everyone and perhaps those of us on the right just a little more than everyone else. There needs to be a hike in awareness and in turn lawful resistance to this new world we are being pushed into without our consent. So please share this article and do your own research it’s only with mass interest and real public scrutiny we can oppose this dystopia future we are perilously close to.
Belarus has been one of the few nations in the northern hemisphere to resist introducing nation-wide quarantines and other large-scale restrictions in its battle with the new coronavirus, instead preferring a targeted response.
Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko has expressed concerns over how powerful nations and interests may try to use the coronavirus pandemic to reshape the world to their own advantage.
“I once asked the question: is this pandemic, this coronavirus, a man-made phenomenon? I don’t know the answer yet, but I have my suspicions. Are politicians and others using this situation for their own purposes? You and I both know the answer to that question. You already see how it is used today…Doesn’t it seem to you that the powerful forces of the world would like to remake the world, without a ‘war’ (Emmanuel Macron has already called it a war), through this so-called ‘corona-psychosis’, or ‘info-demic’? Many people are asking: ‘what will happen after the pandemic?’” Lukashenko said, speaking to Mir TV in an interview airing Friday.
Lukashenko has insisted that Belarus’s economy continue to operate as normal, even if this means risks to his political popularity, saying he could imagine what would happen to the country after the pandemic is over if it were to shut down.
What will happen to us? Other countries will survive. Russia has oil and gas which the world including China needs. China is a huge, powerful economy. America has the [dollar] printing press – they’ve thrown in $2 trillion and plan to spend $2 trillion more. My friend [UN Secretary-General] Antonio Guterres, a sincere man, has proposed printing money worth ten percent of global GDP. Even as things are the dollar is gradually losing its value, and here it will just drop, giving rise to inflation. Where we will come out of this with our [Belarusian] ruble we know,” the president explained.
“Moreover, who will receive these $20 trillion? Where will this money end up? Will it not be a case of the rich getting richer, while the poor get poorer? I think it will. We’ve been pushed to shut down and sit and eat through the small reserves we have. Even in Russia it cannot be said that its currency reserves are so large,” Lukashenko said.
“And then, having printed out this 10 percent of global GDP, those who stay on their feet will come to us and say ‘here is a little for you, but now you will do what we say’. That’s how the world can be reshaped,” he warned.
The president noted that he has no doubt that the world will be a different place when the pandemic ends. His main concern now is what place Belarus will have in this new world.
Belarus has 351 confirmed cases of COVID-19 infection to date, as well as 4 fatalities. The country has rejected broad coercive restrictions to fighting the virus, preferring a strategy of pinpoint measures including quarantine for people with the virus and testing anyone coming into contact with them. Belarus’s factories and farms remain open, as do educational institutions, shops, restaurants and other public amenities, and the country has not closed its borders with its Russian neighbor.
Belarus Often being referred to as the last dictatorship of Europe by western regimes should in itself be a strong signal to the impartial observer that Lukashenko credibility should be taken seriously. O15 has mentioned earlier in the month that perhaps this is the new 9/11 and we say that in terms of what the western regimes will do after the fact. ie What new laws and practises will come about to supposedly prevent another such out break in the future. Whether one believes the virus was man made or not, one thing is for sure as soon as it left China our governments have been working with it hand in hand for their own agendas whatever they maybe you can be sure our prosperity, freedoms and general well being will suffer greatly in the coming years.
ORDER15 has been around several years now and we intend to stay the course and with your help keep a watch and report on the nefarious actions of the ruling establishments. If this post resonates with you, you can support our work by becoming a member or simply sharing our material on social media.
Former Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul suggested on Monday that Democrats are abusing their power by perpetrating a “coronavirus hoax.”
In a column simply titled “The Coronavirus Hoax,” Paul warned that fearful people are “willing to give up freedoms for promises that the government will take care of them.”
“It is ironic to see the same Democrats who tried to impeach President Trump last month for abuse of power demanding that the Administration grab more power and authority in the name of fighting a virus that thus far has killed less than 100 Americans,” Paul wrote.
“State and local authoritarians love panic as well,” he continued before singling out U.S. infectious disease expert Dr. Anthony Fauci as the “chief fearmonger of the Trump Administration.”
“Fauci is all over the media, serving up outright falsehoods to stir up even more panic. He testified to Congress that the death rate for the coronavirus is ten times that of the seasonal flu, a claim without any scientific basis,” Paul wrote. “Over what? A virus that has thus far killed just over 5,000 worldwide and less than 100 in the United States?”
The former GOP presidential candidate concluded: “People should ask themselves whether this coronavirus ‘pandemic’ could be a big hoax, with the actual danger of the disease massively exaggerated by those who seek to profit – financially or politically – from the ensuing panic.”
From a O15 prospective ? well it appears to be a real virus, but at the same time the western regimes reactions to it are clearly suspect at best. and more than likely going to be far more harmful to us all than the virus itself.
WITH VARIOUS tech and financial companies cracking down on traditionalist voices, ORDER15 included it is becoming more important than ever to support the leaders and organizations who are working for the preservation and advancement of the western ideal. They are making the necessary personal sacrifices others cannot . They need your financial support.
Although there are many ways to donate, many of them face privacy hurdles, which is an important concern if you have a job and family to support. Thankfully, such giving does not require you to give up your anonymity. In this guide, I will explain one way to do so safely — by using cryptocurrency.
Alternative Ways of Giving
Before discussing cryptocurrency, it is worth mentioning other, simpler ways to give. The most obvious is to write a check and send it via regular mail or to use the bill paying feature from your bank. The downside is that this is not entirely anonymous, which is an important concern for many people.
Some old-school alternatives that can protect anonymity include moneyorders and cashier’schecks, which you can purchase with cash at a bank or the post office. Click here to learn more about the difference between the two. It is also legal to send cash through the mail, although that is risky. Patreon and Paypal are additional options, but both are hostile to traditionalists. Neither is recommended if other options are available.
How do you use cryptocurrency? For most people, the first step is to create an account at an established cryptocurrency exchange. There are hundreds of exchanges to choose from, but since you will be sharing personal and bank information with them, you will want to use one that is established and trusted (here is a review of some of that are well known).
The largest exchange is Coinbase. Other established exchanges include Gemini, Kraken, and Coinmama. I do not recommend Coinbase because they have a track record of blocking pro-Western organizations. Those blocking efforts are easy to avoid, which I explain below, but why give your personal and banking information to a hostile organization?
Exchanges must comply with a variety of regulatoryrequirements intended to minimize the use of cryptocurrencies for money laundering and terrorism purposes. That means they will collect information on your real identity (often confirmed by taking a photo of your ID with your mobile phone) and a phone number. They will also collect bank information to purchase cryptocurrency. It does not take long to provide this information, but it may take a few days for them to review and approve your account and any bank deposits. Like foreign currency exchanges, they will take a small percentage when you convert money from cash to crypto.
There are other, more anonymous ways to buy cryptocurrency than using an exchange. These include using Bitcoin ATMs and prepaid credit cards that you can purchase at a convenience store. Lean more about those options here and here.
Bitcoin (ticker BTC or XBT) is the most widely used cryptocurrency, but there are others. Bitcoin Cash (BCH) is a widely used alternative that reportedly has lower fees (don’t confuse it with bitcoin itself). Privacy-focused cryptocurrencies include Monero, Dash, and Zcash. We recommend these privacy-oriented alternatives over bitcoin for reasons that are discussed below.
If you want to use an alternative currency, first check the “Donate” page of the organization you want to give to so you can be sure that they take it. If you do not see your preferred cryptocurrency, try emailing them to see if they can accommodate you. Often they can.
Once you have purchased bitcoin or another cryptocurrency, you are free to transfer it to others. If you use an exchange, you could make donations directly from there, but I advise against doing this. In some cases (like Coinbase), they have blocked certain Dissident Right bitcoin addresses. Moreover, if you give money directly from the exchange, you will be doing so in an environment where they already have your personal and banking information, which is hardly an ideal choice if you value privacy and anonymity.
Fortunately, it is easy to get around these privacy concerns by setting up a “wallet” off site. Wallets are a mechanism for storing cryptocurrency and they come in various forms, including online platforms that can be accessed via the web or your mobile phone. Here is a review of some that are widely used.
We prefer desktop wallets because they allow you to avoid going through a third-party web site, which might track your activity. One of the most widely used for bitcoin is Electrum. I prefer Exodus because it has a nicer interface and can handle multiple currencies, including privacy coins. Both are free and easy to use. Here is a review of some desktop alternatives.
Control over your wallet is maintained with a secret code called a private key. All wallets will give you this information and ask you to write it down somewhere. This is only a worry if you plan to keep money in your wallet for any length of time, which we advise against. Do not transfer crypto from the exchange to your wallet until you are ready to make the donation. Send the donation from the wallet to your intended recipient the same day. If you somehow lose your private key and lose access to your wallet, it will matter less if there is no money in it.
Before you send money to anyone else, try sending a tiny amount of crypto back and forth between the exchange and your wallet to get the hang of it. As you will see, transfers take several minutes to be confirmed and there is a small financial charge. You cannot reverse these transactions, so double check the address before you send anything.
Once you feel comfortable and are ready to send a real donation, you can find the relevant cryptocurrency address by going to the web site of the recipient organization and checking their “Donate” or “Cryptocurrency” page. There will be a different address listed for each cryptocurrency, so make sure you choose the correct address for the currency you are using.
Up to this point, this guide has focused primarily on bitcoin, which is the most common form of cryptocurrency. Bitcoin has some important limitations, however, the most important of which is that it is not entirely anonymous. Although bitcoin transactions are not tied to any particular individual identity (they are just numbers), they are transparent and can be easily viewed by anyone who knows how to use a blockchain explorer. For example, look here to see the bitcoin donations to the TOR privacy browser project. Organizations like the SPLC have been known to monitor the bitcoin addresses of pro-Western organizations.
In theory, if you are careful to never tie your real world identity to a given cryptocurrency address, bitcoin’s anonymity is probably still safe enough. This includes never posting your cryptocurrency address on the Internet or using it to purchase goods or services, where you give your real name or real-world address to some vendor. You can further reduce the danger by using a privacy-oriented wallet like Wasabi (here is a review).
Fortunately, there are safer alternatives, called privacy coins, that go a step further and conceal such transaction information (here is a primer). These include Monero (XMR), Dash (DASH), and Zcash (ZEC). Monero is the most commonly used. It can be purchased from a variety of vendors, including the Kraken exchange (here is a how-to guide). After you purchase Monero, you can then transfer it offsite to a Monero-enabled wallet (Exodus is one; here are others) and make donations from there. As always, check first to make sure the recipient organization takes your chosen currency.
When I make a donation, I usually finish by asking for a confirmation of receipt from the recipient organization by email. For larger donations, I often start with a smaller donation of perhaps $20 and wait for a confirmation before sending the rest. (If you don’t have an anonymous email address, you should create one. We recommend Protonmail over services like Google’s Gmail, which has been overrun by SJWs.)
Asking for a confirmation may create a minor administrative headache at the other end, but: (a) it ensures that your donation got through to the intended recipient; and (b) it gives them a way to stay in touch with you via anonymous email. It may also give you access to member-only benefits, like a newsletter or access to private portions of a web site.
Tax exempt organizations may offer to give you a receipt, which allows you to write off a donation on your taxes. This may affect your anonymity, however.
The family unit is one of the fundamental pillars of any society, and so the weaker our family units become the weaker our western nations are going to become. For decades, the traditional family unit has been under assault in America, and the west in general the consequences have been absolutely catastrophic. Today, the marriage rate has dropped to levels that we have never seen before, we continue to have one of the highest divorce rates in the entire world, and more couples than ever are choosing not to get married at all. As a result, the number of single parents has been steadily rising, and at this point the United States actually has the highest rate of children living with a single parent of any country on the entire planet. The following comes from Pew Research…
For decades, the share of U.S. children living with a single parent has been rising, accompanied by a decline in marriage rates and a rise in births outside of marriage. A new Pew Research Center study of 130 countries and territories shows that the U.S. has the world’s highest rate of children living in single-parent households.
Almost a quarter of U.S. children under the age of 18 live with one parent and no other adults (23%), more than three times the share of children around the world who do so (7%).
In comparison, 3% of children in China, 4% of children in Nigeria and 5% of children in India live in single-parent households. In neighboring Canada, the share is 15%.
Should the US really be lecturing anyone else about how they should be conducting themselves when they are in a suicidal death spiral?
Americans like to think of themselves as a light to the rest of the world and a great example that they should follow, but the truth is that the US is a nation of complete and utter self serving degenerates.
Of course it wasn’t always this way. If you go back to 1960, less than 10 percent of all American children lived with a single parent…
America’s top spot has been a long time coming, data from the U.S. Census Bureau show. In 1960, just 9 percent of U.S. children lived with one parent, and just 3 percent lived with either a non-parent relative or a non-relative. By 2019, the Census Bureau estimated that 26 percent of children lived with single parents (a figure that varies from Pew’s due to methodological differences), while just 4 percent lived with non-parent relatives or non-relatives.
So what happened?
Well, the truth is that there has been a concerted effort to radically change American culture, and this has especially been true when it comes to sexual morality.
In 1960, nonmarital births were quite rare. Today, about two-fifths of all births are to unmarried women. This resulted from a complicated combination of moral and behavioral changes, and a new report from Senator Mike Lee’s Social Capital Project disentangles them.
The results for children are often grim. Although academics debate about causality, single parenting is strongly related to risk for poverty and lower educational attainment on the part of the child, as well as incarceration among boys and teenage pregnancy among girls. As the share of single-parent households increases, the risk of these adverse outcomes also rises.
Of course these days a lot of young adults don’t want to have children at all.
The US fertility rate dropped for the fourth straight year in 2018, and has fallen approximately 15% since 2007, according to the National Center for Health Statistics – which reports that there were 59.1 births for every 1,000 women of childbearing age.
In total, 3,791,712 births were recorded across the country last year – extending a steep decline that began during the 2008 Recession, according to the New York Times.
As one user in Reddit’s “Childfree” forum notes: “Babies are expensive, and we’re all broke,” to which another user replied “Also, pregnancy and its effects on the body are gross and not worth it.”
That means that we aren’t even producing enough babies to replace ourselves at this point. aka a death spiral
There is no future for any society that does not value children, marriage and family. You can’t show me one example in human history of any society that has ever thrived for an extended period of time without cherishing those institutions.
It doesn’t take a genius to figure out what we need to do. Unfortunately, most of the west is running completely in the opposite direction as fast as they can.
It’s our belief that its too late for the majority of most western nations but as they collapses in on themselves over the coming decades we can jostle for a decent position coming together as a tightly knit organisation advocating for and practising 015 ideals, and perhaps finding a alternative obtainable worthy goal for our selves and like minded community.
FORT WORTH, TX—Local conservative man Patrick Porkers thrashed liberals Tuesday for supporting policies that he himself will support in just five years.
From medicare for all and a wealth tax to free college and canceling student debt, the conservative systematically dismantled every policy liberals support, though he’s going to cave on every single one of these just a few years from now.
The man says he’s staunchly opposed to how fast progressives are changing things and prefers the conservative approach of changing the exact same things but just on a little bit of a delay.
“Liberals are ruining this country,” he said, shaking both his head and his fist. “They go and put forth all these radical ideas that will destroy the fabric of our society. Sure, I end up conceding ground to the libs and supporting policies I would have found appalling just five years ago. But I’ve got to be the voice of reason here and caution everyone against the very ideas I will come to agree with a short time from now.”
“I mean, let’s slow down and put things on a five-year lag,” he added. “The only way to save this country is for me to half-heartedly resist progressive changes before inevitably making concessions and holding the same beliefs they held just five years ago.”
Satire ? well not really. ”Conservatives everywhere are advocating for and enforcing the exact same Liberal Marxism as the their far left counterparts just at a more relaxed pace. This is why there is no change only a slowing or a quickening of the same agenda, with the end ultimately being the death of the west. The mass can not comprehend let alone resist the duality of this arrangement, the traditional right either goes it alone breaking from mainstream western society or dies off along with it.
No official reason was given from 2 time elected prime minister Viktor Orban but a television channel said Eurovision was ‘a homosexual flotilla’ and that Hungary’s mental health would be better off if it was out of the competition.
Eurovision has long been a propaganda platform for cultural Marxism Austrian drag queen Conchita Wurst winning in 2014.
‘I was not surprised. It comes from the organisational culture of MTVA,’ said the source
Positive coverage of LGBT rights was discouraged, the source said, except for annual coverage of Budapest Pride.
Hungarian website index.hu quoted unnamed sources in public office that saw Eurovision as ‘too gay’.
In a statement, MTVA said: ‘Instead of taking part in the Eurovision Song Contest in 2020, we will support the valuable productions created by the talents of Hungarian pop music directly.’
Since Orban started a second term as prime minister in 2010, free speech and democracy in Hungary have been slowly been making a come back breaking away from communist censorship and propaganda of it’s sordid soviet past.
Members of his ruling party have openly compared homosexuality to paedophilia and called for a boycott of Coca-Cola after an advert featured a gay couple.
András Bencsik, the editor of a pro-tradition magazine, said: ‘I welcome the decision, including from a mental health perspective, that Hungary will not take part in the homosexual flotilla that this international song competition has been reduced to.
‘Many young people thought that this is something for people under 18, but at this event the destruction of public taste takes place with screaming transvestites and bearded women.’
Russia, which has also struggled with it’s communist past, nearly left Eurovision in 2014 after a similar call by its MPs six years after it won the competition.
This latest move by Viktor Orban is just one of countless genuine efforts to restore moral decency and break free of the anti west, anti family cultural marxist agenda. With a proven track record stretching back decades this is a statesmen that does what he says and honours the people that elected him. This is almost unheard of globally and by far the best sitting head of state in the west. While many in the rest of the west are scratching around in the dirt looking for votes or sympathy from a past the tipping point demographic, Hungary has quietly been protecting and strengthening a cohesive homogeneous society based on Nationalist-traditionalist principles.
There is a great reluctance within the wider western Nationalist movement to join anything as in to become a real paying and or active member of a organisation. True or not the reasons given time and again are ”it’s too late” or there isn’t anything credible or professional enough worth support, and perhaps so within ones own country. ORDER15 having a international outlook from the get go doesn’t limit itself to national boarders or local communities and has long argued that Nationalist say in USA or UK where the tipping point has already been reached some ten years now, join international organisations like ours or throw in with Eastern European parties in countries like Hungary where there is a realistic chance to realise our ideals and in doing so further ensure a future for the western ideal. For further information on FIDESZ the party of viktor orban you can find them here https://fidesz.hu/
Brexit is Irrelevant to Britain’s Future -The June 23 vote on British membership of the European Union is meaningless to the UK’s future—because longstanding immigration policies will have plunged Britain into minority white and Third World status by 2066.
This racial demographic shift will happen no matter what the referendum’s outcome might be—a fact which all of the “vote no” campaigns stoically ignore—and can only be averted by dramatic—and unlikely—internal political reform.
The projection that Britain will become majority nonwhite is not some flight of fancy or delusional rant.
Professor David Coleman, Supernumerary Fellow in Human Sciences and University Professor in Demography at St. John’s College, Oxford, produced a study in 2013 which showed that the aftereffects of “decades of migration” and natural reproduction rates will have made the UK the West’s “most ethnically diverse nation after 2050.”
Furthermore, Professor Coleman said, white Britons will be an outright minority in the UK by the year 2066.
His findings were in a report compiled for the Migration Observatory, part of Oxford University’s Centre on MigrationPolicy and Society (COMPAS).
He wrote: “On current trends European populations will become more ethnically diverse, with the possibility that today’s majority ethnic groups will no longer comprise a numerical majority.”
Professor Coleman said migration has become the “primary driver of demographic change.”
According to the data—extracted from the Office of National Statistics (ONS) Census—as of 2011, around 20 percent of people in the UK are “nonwhite or non-British.”
This percentage, the report said, expected to rise to a quarter by 2025, a third by 2040, and reach up to 38 percent by 2050.
Declining birth rates among white Britons is another factor, he said. In England and Wales, 25 percent of births were already to foreign-born mothers.
White Minority in UK by 2066
The report concluded that “the crossover for the whole country when the combined population of all ethnic minority groups together would exceed the population of white British will occur at around 2066.”
Professor Coleman’s figures are from 2012, it should be remembered. By 2016, the situation is much worse.
London Already Majority Third World
The trends are obvious for anyone wishing to see them. According to the 2011 ONS Census, 45 percent of Londoners described themselves as “white British”—a drop from the 58 percent who did so just ten years earlier.
If that was not enough, the next generation of Londoners—that is, those currently in school—should tell anyone who wants to know, what that city will look like in another ten years.
According to 2012 figures released by the UK’sDepartment for Education (DFE), some 69 percent of all school children in Greater London are nonwhite.
The DFE figures show that for all of London—divided into “inner” and an “outer”” regions for statistical purposes, there were, in 2012, a total of 498,445 pupils at school.
Inner London had 176,920 pupils, of whom 81.3 percent of primary pupils were officially classified as “nonwhite British” by the DFE.
For secondary schools in Inner London, the DFE said that 80.7 percent are “nonwhite British.”
In Outer London, the DFE said, 62.1 percent of primary school children are “nonwhite British,” and 58.7 percent of secondary schoolchildren are “nonwhite British.”
Averaged out, this means that some 67.25 percent of all of London’s schoolchildren are “nonwhite British”—and this would have been in 2012, four years ago.
If London is already 55 percent non-British, the implications of the school-age population entering the adult population will dramatically tip the population balance even more within the next five years.
This has nothing to do with the EU, and everything to do with the immigration policies pursued by successive British governments, for which the people of Britain have continuously voted.
Does EU Membership Matter?
The conclusion of this demographic overview is unpalatable to many on the “right” who have campaigned so vigorously for the “no” vote in the June 23 UK referendum.
This conclusion is that membership of the EU is going to make no difference to the only real issue facing Britain: its survival as a First World, majority European, nation.
While there might—or might not, depending on whose statistics one wants to believe—be some economic advantage to leaving the EU—that doesn’t really matter.
EU membership will be irrelevant to the UK in 2060, which will resemble and function something like like Brazil
The only way that this future can be averted is through a social and political revolution to halt and reverse Third World demographic replacement.
Given current political circumstances in Britain, what are the chances of such a political and social revolution?
The answer to that, unfortunately, is clear. Nationalist & patriots in general have for years repeated the mantra that the general western population/electorate are some how asleep and that once we have been able to wake them they will see their being scammed out of existence and join our ranks. This is perhaps the greatest mistake and frankly a bizarre childlike attempt to self shield from the hard to swallow truth. It is in fact Nationalist & patriots that are themselves sound asleep, sound asleep to their own tune of false hope and wild imagination, and with it certain defeat.
Wise people should now be thinking of alternatives. We believe we have that alternative and with your support we can actually progress with a lasting successful push towards a parallel society that will run counter to the morally collapsing mainstream society. As the west degenerates and stagnates further our fringe movement and message starts to resonate and gain traction. If you believe you can make a positive contribution to ORDER15 then sign up today and help us help those that want it.
The protocols are aimed at distance from the mass, never subordinating the superior to the inferior, dynamic control and awareness in all circumstances.
Context Perhaps the most recent texts outlining the kind of protocol we are now addressing is Budo Shoshinsu, a collection of the most authentic moral teachings of the Japanese knights, written in the 16th Century for young samurais to teach them the foundations of bushido, “the spiritual path of the warrior”. The teachings concern the appropriate perception of death (as an opportunity for transcendence, which is apparent in everyday behavior, heightened awareness and the importance of the moment), loyalty (towards the superior and everything that is superior), high alert (always prepared to face defining moments), martial arts (control over forces and actualizing the principle of One, thus creating harmony between the “inner world” and the “environment”), weaponry and behavior without excesses (excess is the result of attachment: to wine, women, etc….attachment means being dominated). To live by the principles outlined in the teachings required to maintain control over all areas of life (thoughts, emotions, actions on the physical plane, higher states of consciousness). Control is analogous with dominance over power(s), a fundamentally solar, male, royal principle. In short the teachings were oriented towards maintaining the dominance of the superior (pure, independent/detached, solar, royal, direct, masculine) over the inferior (attached, dependent, lunar, reflective, dark, feminine). The difference between Japan in the 1500s and the world at large today is that Japan was a traditional society, quite isolated from its rapidly degenerating environment. The process of degeneration has continued until today. Today there is no chance of isolation for traditional world views to subsist. Modern world view is pervasive while traditional world view is heavily attacked and ridiculed at best: modern world view is the direct result of the general process of involution, while the traditional world view reflects the state of consciousness dominant before the process of involution –materialisation- started. In the epoch of Tradition the potentialities of various aspects of materialism were marginalized (in consciousness therefore in society as well, where it was prevalent among slaves only). Today all these unrealized potentials are being actualized by inferior people whose life’s purpose is to serve tendencies (forces) that actualize these potentials (slaves). We may consider the actualization of potentials natural. What makes the actualization of all aspects of materialism destructive however is the notion that it is superior to Absolutism, or that materialism should be the context for actions in all areas of life, which would make it a relatively absolute factor (which is of course senseless): absolute, because no principles are perceived or accepted beyond it, and of course relative, since the refusal of principles is merely the result of inferior (materialistic) thinking and the inability of this thinking to grasp them. The difference between the era of Tradition and the Modern era is that in Tradition the hierarchy of existence was truly reflected in social organization (caste system) whereas in the age of modernity this hierarchy is reversed. Thus the level of consciousness and the world view of slaves is dominant today. In all areas of life, this world view is in direct opposition to the royal, super human consciousness, which in the era of Tradition was directly and actively represented by the King (of the world). The king dominated by his presence (passively active: no action was necessary), while the queen on his side was a living symbol of power active in the manifest world. Slaves have never had power. The (active) dominance of power was the domain of the warrior caste. For warriors the King represented absolute knowledge, thus the purpose of their life. Today, just like in the age of Tradition, slaves don’t dominate power. Their pursuit of power is senseless and always reflects inferior and repulsive style elements. Dominance, thus masculine potentials are so much out of range for them that instead of dominating power, they are trying to identify with it. Not grasping the concept of dominance they want to become the symbological queen and sit on the king’s throne. They put each other on the throne and laugh at each other there. It is comical, although this is a dark kind of humor, since it also involves the usurpation of power. Today there are millions of such thrones (positions) everywhere. We have artificial organizations in all areas of life today: politics, military, religious organizations, the corporate world, academia and criminal organizations. Each deserves separate studies. What’s relevant here is that they “took over” structures from the era of Tradition, but since they all lack true fundamentals (they are based on illusions), these structures were first empty shells (pseudo hierarchies where positions are “rewarded” based on the amount of inferior (reflective) knowledge and manipulation), then the structure itself has been changed, reflecting the very illusions that called them forth: “horizontal hierarchies” (flat organizations), female principles in leadership, etc. All reflect a materialistic world view that denies vertical differentiation, promotes a gross and stupid equality and since it is unable to define it’s own principle (matter), it completely lacks any foundation. Only in artificial organizations is it possible that people occupy roles without actualizing royal principles in themselves under a false sense of leadership. Thus ranks have no significance, they don’t represent plexuses of power. Instead of actualizing the principles of power and dominance within themselves, men (and women) remain powerless and increase the effort of manipulation and accumulation of inferior knowledge. The use of weaponry for example doesn’t require super human qualifications. It requires inferior education only that enables people with no inner power whatsoever to operate them (as opposed to traditional fighting systems like swordsmanship and archery, where the weapons were the very symbols of the path to achieve super human states, which the warriors were actively occupying and then transcending). War is necessary when power is usurped. It’s purpose is to reinstate the dominance of the superior over the inferior in all areas of life.
Front lines Open war
In the era of Tradition and the initial stages of history (external) war was a focused effort, reflecting a focused, controlled, dominated mind, aligned to supra rational consciousness. External war (small jihad) was the reflection of the warrior’s efforts to eliminate involutive tendencies within himself (great jihad) and to conquer principles by transcending the human state. In the era of Tradition war was the domain of the best: nobility; hence the respect of the fighting parties for each other: they were not in opposition but fought for the same purpose on different sides. They were fighting an inner war. External war provided them with opportunities to actualize many potentials. In such a war there were no losers. The dominance of one didn’t mean defeat for the other. Only the superior was involved in war and the victory of one was a revelation that he actualized the principle of One in himself to a larger degree then the other. Thus One’s victory, whether or not it ended up in the other’s physical death, provided the other with a chance of transcendence. Both the death of the best of the dominated forces and the victory of the dominating forces was glorious. The two achieved the same objective. Victory was the divine manifestation of the superior, a testimony that the victor had already transcended the human state. The one who died, achieved it after death; in a way the next stage of his initiation was triggered by the victor. The victor saw himself in the defeated, the defeated saw himself in a more actualized state, in the victor. The two were one. As we follow history and get closer to the present day, the purpose of war has been gradually changing, taking on more and more inferior forms. First, with the disappearance of kings in total dominance, the royal weapons of bows/arrows and swords were replaced by more inferior weapons that no longer symbolized any path, they were mere technologies. In the same time the purpose of war was becoming less spiritiual and more material/economical. Naturally this meant that more people from the lower castes were involved in war. In the last stage of history it is the masses that are fighting for resources; there is no principle involved, the fighters are the slaves, there are no warriors: war has become terrible, the symbol of total annihilation: the individual in the mass, who identifies himself completely with his body suffers complete elimination. Everybody loses, there are no victors. Everybody involved serves negative tendencies. Nobody dominates power. Various powers dominate everybody. The mass is powerless. Actual war is just the open, intensified version the occult war that takes place in everyday life. Individuals in the mass (slaves) are unable to exercise any control. There’s no force of integration (leadership roles are also occupied by slaves) so there’s no vertical alignment towards principles. Soldiers are disrespectful and cynical. They confuse power with technology. The soldiers are excessively weak: no nerves, no mental strength and absolutely no presence of intellect: rape, brutality and cruelty is wide spread*. Entertainment and promiscuity is part of war. In the very near future even the slaves are going to be replaced by robots operated by male or female operators (not soldiers). Not only is the masculine principle not present, in a sense the war is against the masculine principle itself.
Occult war Negative tendencies are fighting against a few superior men (representing principles) through the masses. Today everybody with an unshakable materialistic world view is a mass individual and blindly follows/obeys negative (anti traditional or modern) tendencies. The pseudo principles they submit to are democracy, evolutionism, progressivism and a twisted “spirituality” that perceives God outside of one’s existence. In the 1500s young samurais were advised to simply avoid places that are not appropriate for their rank (pubs where low caste people gather, brothels, etc.), behavior that is typical to inferior people (pursuing pleasures: visiting whores, drinking) and to be always on high alert once they leave their house. The reason given for this was because they could at any time expect some crazy individual to pick a fight with them (the symbology of which is that the inferior would force the superior into situations that are unworthy of him). Today this advise still holds, although social organization according to the caste system no longer exists. The number of superior people is very low and one finds only places where inferior people gather, blindly pursuing pleasures and fun, “dedicated” only to economical and material goals, exercising the least amount of control possible. The elite is not organized; every member of the elite is isolated. Every one of them must fight individually. There is nowhere to go. Each one must decide: fight or die. They must fight a royal fight, actualizing principles in themselves, becoming superior, occupying their place in the true hierarchy. The isolation is not physical. Superior people are born into an inferior environment, grow up in an inferior “culture”, they are exposed to inferior value systems, they are completely surrounded by the mass. The mass is a brute aggressor whose only purpose is to disable the superior reaching his goal. The mass has no other purpose, the force behind it is the absolute anti-principle: it can’t be reached, can’t be realized, can’t be actualized. It doesn’t even exist by itself: it’s existence depends on the principle of One it is fighting against. This births senseless behavior, irrationalism, blind mechanism, stupidity.
Orientation of the mass Today we find the following elements that are typical of the mass: Pleasure. It is fundamentally oriented towards the body, slightly oriented towards the mind (not the intellect). The pursuit of pleasure is pervasive in all areas of life. The illusion of the mass is that life is not worth living without pleasure. They don’t realize that the kind of pleasure they are pursuing stems from the same roots as the pain and suffering they are trying to avoid. The root is an unquenchable thirst for life (the cause of their existence). Once pleasure is “achieved”, pain or suffering is immanent. In the same token, once pain or suffering is experienced, the pursuit of pleasure is intensified. The notion that people’s behavior is driven by the avoidance of pain and the pursuit of pleasure was established and this senseless behavior is truly valid for the masses today. Everything people do to pursue pleasure is in the context of a material world view. All their actions are the opposite of the actions of the superior. This difference is perceivable by different style elements. Since pleasure is mostly material, individuals in the mass are increasingly unable to differentiate between types of pleasure. One aspect of materialism is exactly the lack of differentiation. Emotional pain is “cured” by chocolate, alcohol, etc.
Examples outlined very briefly
Eating and drinking as perceived by the inferior they eat and drink carbohydrates, glucose, lactose, calories, protein, fats, alcohol, etc. focus is exclusively on the body. Also, eating and drinking habits reflect emotional states and fluctuations. Eating and drinking may become a compensation. Eating style is animalistic, greedy, voracious. Prefer strong tastes for immediate benefits. The inferior consumes. Without control. Blindly and in (mostly large) quantities.
Eating/drinking as perceived by the superior enjoy the sight, smell and taste of tender meat, exciting vegetables, soft butter, honey, hot, fresh bread, etc. they capture and fix the deep ecstasy of wine with their soul, they fly with the volatile strength of spirits and they intimately know the solid, calm quality in beer. This is not eating or drinking. This is active knowledge. For them the food or the drink is a symbol of the essence they already have, thus eating and drinking is a ritual for the actualization of knowledge. Quantity is absent, only quality is present.
Exercise – inferior To look good, be attractive, improve self esteem, improve physical health. The self is subordinated to the body; it identifies with the body.
Exercise – superior Looking good is of no concern; the superior man is attractive to the superior woman because of the principles/superior knowledge he actively acquired and the dominance he exerts; the superior transcends the individual self and identifies with I, the ruler of existence and consciousness (self esteem is senseless); physical health and strength serves the purpose of actualizing the absolute man (or woman) and it is the consequence of appropriate actions of the I. The body serves the I.
Relaxation – inferior Analogous with stupor. In an acute lack of understanding and under the aegis of an astounding lie, the mass uses names of traditional doctrines to accomplish stupor: yoga, meditation, contemplation. They breathe deep to calm the nerves and cope with stress, which they experience because they don’t understand the cause of existential crisis.
Calm – superior For the superior every area of life is a ritual, thus he lives in high (intellectual) intensity; the behavioral style is calm, firm and unshakable. On the path of actualizing the One in himself, he exercises meditation and contemplation supreme. He exerts synthesized control over “thoughts” and “emotions”. Striving to be detached from the body and transcend the human state. Relaxation is senseless.
Talk – inferior Their talk reflects their thoughts. Uncontrolled, associative: one thing reminds them of another thing, that of another, etc. their talk is chatter that lacks strength. They also go with the flow, and find themselves in situations that they don’t understand; in fact they are not aware that they are in “situations”. The subject of their talk is their “life”: Work, relationships, kids, shopping, jokes, etc. infinitely boring and there’s nothing to follow. They either talk all the time or the don’t talk at all. When they don’t talk it’s not a sign of control but that of a particular emotional state.
Communications – superior What do two people, who have absolute knowledge talk about? What does a wise man and a mass man talk about? Nothing: it is senseless. The wise knows the mass man, the mass man is not fit to comprehend knowledge…also, he’s too busy talking. The superior makes statements when the time is right. He doesn’t get into arguments (discursive knowledge is inferior). the purpose of statements from the superior is to trigger the “evolution” of others, who are ready. Discussion is avoided. The superior doesn’t want to persuade.
Dance – inferior Part of fun, pleasure and even exercise. The scene has become the disco or (mostly latin) dance clubs (the music played in clubs is just a feeble attempt to organize the confusion in the “composers” mind). The style of dance in discos is reflective of the mindset of the mass: mechanistic, robot like. Isolated people, men and women moving the same way. Physical contact is always sexually motivated. Dance (besides drinks of course) has become a necessary step for sex between strangers and semi strangers. This mentality is also valid in dance clubs. While these clubs maintain various forms of dance, the motivation is to mate, to have fun or even to exercise.
Dance – superior Dance is a ritual that serves the purpose of the realization of the absolute man and the absolute woman. The dancing parties become the symbols of these absolute states. Dance is serious. The harmony between the movements of the man and the movements of the woman is analogous with sex. The force that drives these movements are sexual. Since the woman sees in the man the symbol of the absolute man and vice versa, sexuality is experienced in high intensity, but impersonally, on a supra individual plane. Dance doesn’t involve one improvised move (ritual choreography). This way, there is no room for individual sexual motivation. Once individual (inferior) sexual motivation is present, the magic of dance is gone.
Arts – inferior Industrial design, under the aegis of practicality.
Arts -superior similarly to eating and drinking, arts are the actualization of knowledge: ritual.
Sex – inferior Pursued exclusively for the sake of pleasure. Each individual pursues his/her own pleasure. The act is comparable to mutual masturbation (just like their dancing style). On a lower level they even consider it fun. Alcohol is almost always part of the experience. In fact the reason for drinking alcohol is often exclusively to have sex. This is true even when it is not immediately apparent: at pubs, company events. It is more apparent in discos and whenever dance is involved. Attraction is based largely on physical faculties. Sex dominates both men and women.
Sex – superior Similarly to dance, it is a ritual whereby both the man and the woman are symbols of the absolute man and woman. The stages reflect the alchemical operations of separation, preparation, burning, retraction to the root (beginning), etc. If alcohol is used it is never to ”achieve” a state of stupor but to experience the analogue qualities of ecstasy, the lifting of spirit as a preparation for sex, whereby higher states of consciousness is achieved. The woman is in analogy with sex (taken to the extreme she is sexuality); man dominates sex, he is never dominated by it.
Fun/entertainment – inferior Geared toward focusing the mind, to induce some level of negative entropy; instead of the upward direction of the focus of the superior however, the inferior focuses his attention downward.
3. Work and career Artificial roles, where there is no room for the intellect (superiority); there are rationalizations only, which are subordinated to inferior goals. People are subordinated to functions and become mechanistic (robot like) sometimes animalistic. The work environment was created specifically for the masses and is mostly maintained by mass individuals. Just like everywhere else, the pursuit of “fun”, pleasure, money and/or positions or all of these is constant.
Work, fun and pleasure is mostly intertwined among the mass. The motto is that “if it feels good, it is good”. Since the mass evaluates everything on a physical level, they are ready to try anything under this motto, all the while, due to their relative mindset, they are losing grasp on what feels good and what doesn’t: since they are on the lookout for new sources of pleasure, they find less and less things that don’t feel good.
Protocol in social situations:
First of all we must differentiate between the masses and people who don’t belong to the mass but are not (yet) superior either. These people are potentially superior, but they are confused or not on a path to realization. The presence of the superior means a force of integration for these people. They start to realize latent potentials and perhaps organize around the superior, gradually acquiring higher knowledge themselves and exhibiting the superior style elements. When the caste system was alive, there were three basic levels between the king and the slaves (warriors representing controlled force, merchants, representing control over economics, craftsmen, representing control over matter…the slaves were outside the hierarchy, representing merely bodies who exercised no control by themselves). In the time of Tradition superiority was reality and respect from the less superior towards the more superior was authentic. Today reality is defined by inferiority where respect has no foundations. Although the degree of actualization of true, absolute principles in people is still different, thus a hierarchy is potentially in place, the influence of negative tendencies is so strong that these potentials maybe realized by the best only while the rest falls victim to negative tendencies. Recognizing the style elements of the mass and keep a distance is vital. Thus the following protocols are not for the masses. It is for the actually and the potentially superior. We must also differentiate between protocol for men and women. Men are warriors who can expect “attacks” from the mass from anywhere, any time. Even though the mass directly target superior men, attacks may come directly or indirectly. Indirect attacks come through their women. Women, who belong to a superior man must be aware of their role in this scenario. All women who are potentially superior (with or without a superior man) are subject to attacks, but women who belong to a superior man experience more of these. Although naturally each person is different, they exhibit some similar characteristics due to the same orientation of their focus**; in interactions they are always courteous, collected and calm, their actions are void of everything unnecessary. They don’t make compromises in most of those situations individuals the mass considers to be normal. The most common of these situations are based on undifferentiation. The mass can’t differentiate, can’t grasp the essence. This results in them mixing everything up in life, which results in a total lack of clarity. Examples: mixing of men and women: there really is only physical difference between them. On any other level feminine tendencies dominate. The term unisex was born and they even start to look the same. They don’t have a need for differentiation. They share saunas, swimming pools, lie next to each other on the beach, perform the same tasks in adjacent cubicles, drinking together in pubs, men and women gossiping with each other, competing against each other. Men don’t look at women as women, and women don’t look at men as men. They look at body parts: both men and women see butts, breasts, legs, arms, backs, stomachs etc. The focus of attention reflects a fragmented world view. It is common that women and men start to look at other women’s or men’s body parts, as well. In all situation there’s mostly indifference. This is of course no detachment. They are both dominated by sexuality. So when it comes to sex, it lacks real tension (tension comes from differentiation). Partially due the constant lack of tension, but increased promiscuity, learned homosexuality is rampant. The mass propagates that everything is ok, as long as it doesn’t hurt (physically) others. Also, they do anything for fun and pleasure. This has become the norm. mixing of races. It starts also in the context of fun, pleasure and even careers. Example: white (and other) people listening to North American black music (not accidentally the strongest “cultural” influence today world wide), dancing to black music, dressing like blacks, moving like blacks, talking like blacks and acting like blacks. Then mixing with blacks. The mass doesn’t differentiate, so this is –in a sick sense- not a surprise. Mixing perspectives: the mass thinks in relative terms. They are unable to grasp metaphysical (absolute) contexts. Their thinking is feeble and relative: they have no real context so they are always mixing what they perceive to be a context with content. Science has become unscientific, the truth has become relative and law has become unlawful. Protocol for women who already belong to a man One of the most fundamental context of the behavior of women is sex. Sex is always present in social interactions. Within this context, sharing is a fundamental part of woman’s nature. For women, the protocol is based on control over sharing. The woman should not adjust her behavior to the environment, but to her man only. The range of social interactions exceed those that are directly, or almost directly (through 2-3 steps) linked to sexuality. Here we only look at those that are directly related. The difficulty is that the closer a woman is to the absolute state, the more sexual she is and also, she possesses a quality which is typically described as “nice”. “Nice” however has more than one aspect. A woman, whose life depends on a superior man, is nice but distant. She exerts the kind of happiness only women in love can. She smiles and laughs, but she is in control and distant. People see that she is happy, smiling and polite. But these visual style elements are the only ones she shares with others. She doesn’t share her dreams, fantasies with anybody but her man; she doesn’t talk about her body and of course, she doesn’t talk about her sexuality even to other women! She shares everything with her man only, who is the one who insures this control. Sharing information verbally or by writing is a very intimate thing. Sharing information over drinks, away from others, is even more intimate. Only primitive people think that sharing the body is what “matters” only. Superior women know that everything they share with others, they take away from their man, who they belong to completely: in this sense they are worst then prostitutes, since prostitutes put on sale to the inferior which already belongs to the inferior. A woman, intimately sharing information with other men and even other women, puts on sale that, which belongs to the superior. Naturally, even telling about this openly to the man after, is not an excuse for the act already done.). Even inferior men “feel” this truth and this is why they are only jealous of other men, if they are unknown to them (at the women’s work, from their past, etc.). This truth doesn’t know social ranks: blue color workers or bankers feel the same burning jealousy. If the woman is flirting with their own friends, even if it is in front of their own eyes, they are not jealous, they don’t even notice. Inferior women often cheat on their husbands with family friends. Only the most primitive men don’t care who their women share information with. This is because their view is so materialistic, that they themselves identify with their body only, thus that’s all they want from the woman, as well. Since the woman, through her sexuality closely identifies with her body, the more primitive the man, the more feminine he is. Women typically break the protocol of not sharing precisely because they have a man. They make small compromises to comply with social norms and they think that situations are innocent or they confuse the notion of being “intimately nice” with being “nice with a distance”. Both inferior men and women take advantage of this confusion by being indiscreet. In fact when a woman experiences indiscretion it maybe an indication that she has not kept a distance. Indiscretion is sneaky. Always hidden, it looks innocent, humorous or nice or has an “it’s OK” undertone (especially when drinking is involved; in fact drinking with a man automatically invites/encourages the inferior man’s indiscretions), especially if it comes from people who are considered to be acquaintances. Today people know a lot of people but these are not “relationships”, they have no foundations; they are superficious and meaningless. Needless to say that any kind of indiscretion coming from strangers (however small, nice, funny, etc. they maybe) are unacceptable . To use the samurai analogy, indiscretion is analogous with somebody crazy trying to pick a fight. If it already happened (couldn’t have been avoided by distance), it must be dealt with swiftly and and for good, to make sure it will never happen again: it is time to use the sword. The range of indiscretions is wide. It could be questions about private life, almost anything related to sexuality, invasion of privacy (contact at inappropriate times), even talking about own life without being asked. Today both the work place and public areas (bars, pubs, public transport, etc.) is full of instances of indiscretions that most people don’t give attention to and walk by in a state of sleep. It could be as common as mass emails sent to “buddy lists”, or innocent questions like what did you do last night. This last one is interesting because the one who’s asking is not even aware of why it is indiscreet. What makes it indiscreet is the wrong answer, that would imply sharing information. So the question set up, initiated the circumstances for indiscretions. People in the mass are always curious. Knowing is possessing. If they know the superior, they have a sense of excitement, similar to the one the thief feels, because they feel they possess them, in a sense steal part of them. At some instances of indiscretion it’s enough to ignore the situation in other cases taking a direct stance and “using the sword” is necessary. It is important that the woman is aware of the situation, almost like in a state of heightened awakeness, feeling that this is a “war situation”, carefully controlling her actions. The presence of this control already creates a distance. If the situation is clearly an intentional indiscretion, the woman must flatly ask to stop it. The man the woman belongs to is always present in the woman, even when he is physically not around. Typically this presence, as a passive dominance, repels indiscretions coming from both inferior women and men. When the woman keeps the distance towards somebody who is not a mass member she does them a favour. The cool distance makes them adjust their behavior. When she keeps her distance from the mass she does what she must: active opposition to the mass, active subordination to her man. The conscious act of subordination to her man becomes sharply evident, if the inferior man, who commits the indiscretion is above the woman in the pseudo hierarchy at work. In such instances the woman openly subordinates (cuts off) all inferior, material considerations. Superior women typically experience subtle indiscretions only, it rarely happens that they face gross indiscretions, like concrete, direct sexual proposals. These happen mostly to women who have no desire to keep a distance and happily “mix” with anyone. Gross indiscretions are the result of this pattern of mixing. From their point of view it is not even indiscretion, but something “men do”. Gross indiscretions geared towards the superior woman are grotesque and less dangerous than the subtle ones. They are easy to notice and easy to deal with immediately. The subtle ones have a more violent, bullying character: by using “socially accepted values”, like niceness and “friendliness”, it forces the woman to take a stand in “small” situations, taking a risk of coming across “strange” in the eyes of the mass; for them however this is not a risk, because keeping a distance means more than being friendly.
Protocol for women who don’t belong to a man The biggest challenge these women face is the lack of masculine principle in the majority of men. Besides of course the control of sharing and keeping a distance from the mass in general, adhering to the basics of etiquette enables women to exhibit the appropriate style elements to attract potentially or actually superior men and repel the mass men. With the adherence to etiquette, they repel mess women as well. Even though without men, the question of subordination to the superior applies to these women as much as to those who belong to a man. Ideally they should submit to the idea of the absolute man until the idea becomes an actuality when meeting the man. Important consideration is that a superior man who already has a woman (or women) is always preferable to an inferior man. Two more points must be addressed here: meeting the superior man and sexuality. Both of these could trigger “wrong compromises”. In traditional societies the caste system itself provided the solution for meeting the right man. The authenticity of caste system was based on active dominance of the superior. Belonging to a particular caste and being born to a particular family set the conditions for “finding” the right man. The notion of love was not distorted by modern sentimentalism and notions of men serving his woman and his family, or that the woman grants favours, or allows men certain things. The woman experienced her existence in subordination to the man, who exerted active (intellectual) dominance, which is synonymous with higher (impersonal from the point of view that it is higher than the individual) love. Today’s “system” has no authenticity. Both men and women are seeking (sinking into) sentimentalism. “Falling in” love is a correct term to describe the the rather primitive physical love people confuse with the higher ideal. “Freed from the bonds” of hierarchies, mass members, who are often positioned no higher than on a regressive infantile level, “freely” decide who to marry, who to date, who to have “relationship” with. The criteria is often no more than a body part. In other cases it is social rank, which, lacking any authenticity, is a negative image of true hierarchies of previous eras, thus choosing a “life mate” becomes a mockery Tradition. It is typical of women that they are trying to find men for those who don’t have any yet often with the specific intention, to make sure she “gets enough”, that she is sexually satisfied. To increase the chances, they often look among men, who they consider to be safe choices (e.g. unable to get women on their own), and they either do introductions (better scenario) or set up a blind dates for them. A blind date is an opportunity of checking each other out and quickly decide: he/she looks good, or doesn’t look good and how much compromise one is willing to make, etc. This is in sharp contrast to introductions even as recently as 100-150 years ago, when meetings had a more ritualistic character: formal introductions in the presence of parents or the public, controlled communications and a general sense of high tension. If the “arrangements” produce no results, the woman gets a dildo for her birthday, and the search continues, typically not for long. After accepting the notion of “you gotta have somebody”, the woman will either go out to get drunk and get laid, or provokes the indiscretion of somebody at work by a little flirting, then accepts the dinner invitation, gets drunk and gets laid, thereby establishing a relationship. By nature women are controlled by sexuality. The circumstances today are such, that the media specifically propagates that not only is it OK for women to subordinate themselves to inferiority, like promiscuous men (themselves controlled by sexuality, just like women), but seeking anything higher than physical pleasure (which is just a small aspect of physical love) is socially not acceptable or “funny”; this is again a typical slave mentality, which directly attacks and undermines the superior. Women represent sexuality, (superior) men represent control over sexuality. By “carrying” the ideal man in herself, almost like being in love with him, the woman exhibits certain style elements that draws the right man (at least as close to the state of absolute man, as the woman is to the state of the absolute woman) to her. This protocol applies only to superior women, not most women. Once the right man finds her, he’ll take her. The style elements of the right man are typically open and honest and enable the woman to recognize superiority and distinctiveness: the actual man replaces the ideal. The superior woman without man applies the same protocol to all mass men as women with men. Protocol for superior men The essence of the superior man is in opposition to the mass. On all levels men must realize royal principles. On the highest level he is in complete dominance, on a lower level he actively pursues dominance over powers, and loyalty to the highest principle, on an even lower level control over his life, typically as a family man (head of family) and loyalty to the superior; all superior men are loyal, exhibit various degrees of detachment from what is considered to be life by the mass (burning desires, thirst for becoming, attachments). They are detached. They don’t subordinate themselves to anything inferior, including women. They are not dominated by sexuality or substances (drink, food, drugs, etc.). The more the man has actualized the principle of One in himself the more personal the war is for him. On the highest level he sees the “enemy”, the cause of the negative tendencies in himself. Eliminating the cause is the purpose of the war. On such a level awareness extends to every moment. Mass individuals experience “important”, defining moments in their life only occasionally: graduation, important promotion, wedding, divorce, etc. Maybe 10 defining moments in an average life. Maximum. Superior men experience at least this many every day. Actualizing potentials is what makes up their life. An acute ability to recognize the essence, to differentiate. To clarify and put things into their place. Always purpose driven, they act from context. The decisions they make are essential, contextual, not the result of analogy: the result of synthesis. They consider the appropriate factors only; they eliminate confusion. They maintain perfect communication. If they write or read, it is for this purpose. They listen in context, from the point of view of the truth. They avoid discussions, arguments, they don’t want to persuade. They make statements. This straight forwardness characterize all their actions. The way they act is clear from distortions. They are not influenced by attachments, sentimentalism or low level considerations. Their acts are focused, pure and powerful. Since they actualize supra rational knowledge, on the level of the causes of phenomena, their life is a ritual. Everything is symbology including themselves and the roles they play. This includes their relationship with a woman or women. Inferior women typically avoid superior men. What makes a woman inferior is the drive to subordinate themselves to the inferior. Women that are not completely mass women, and of course superior women, feel attraction to superior men and a strong desire to subordinate themselves to him (in most cases this is not based purely on physical factors. Those are quickly becoming irrelevant). The higher level the actualization of One in the man, the more women he already possesses (potentially or actually). On the level of the king, all women belong to him***. They avoid situations that calls for subordination to the inferior: women or inferior men. They are the symbol of One, royalty, absolute man. Meditation and contemplation supreme is a daily practice. Challenges are plentiful. Not making compromises is dangerous. Survival is not possible without some adjustments. Situations may arise that their presence activate latent potentials in men lower then them but who don’t belong to the mass. In such situations, even if the superior man is put in a lower role in the artificial hierarchy, his dominance is still undeniable. Today they must occupy positions of power even in this reverse hierarchy so they can exert the kind of influence they must. This is of course more than difficult but it maybe possible by staying both inside and outside the system. Each man must have a plan to accomplish this. They must avoid places of gross stupidity. Just being there is a potential reason for corruption. They may experience direct attacks from men putting them in situations, which are not natural (normally a superior man should never meet a slave).
Ever wondered how societal norms change and seem to change right across the west all at roughly the same time. Ever wonder who or what sets the rules and boundaries for political discourse.
There’s a bizarre notion going around that societies likes and dislikes, choices and actions are results of some sort of naturally occurring evolutionary steps. The acceptance of Homosexuality for example is widely believed to come about as the result of a random collective awakening. While legalisation across the west started more than 50 years ago it’s only as recently as 20 years ago that it became widely accepted in mainstream society but how ? Did people just hear it had been legalised and just got used to it over the years all by themselves.
Social engineering is a discipline in social science that refers to efforts to influence particular attitudes and social behaviors on a large scale, whether by governments, media or private groups in order to produce desired characteristics in a target population.
Social engineers use the scientific method to analyze and understand social systems in order to design the appropriate methods to achieve the desired results in individuals and groups. Unbeknown to just about everyone Social engineering is as prevalent taxes.
Western governments are using social engineering as a gradual process of destroying all traditions, languages, religions, individuality, national institutions, family, law and order in order to re-assemble society in the future as their utopia. This utopia will have no notion of gender, traditions, morality, god or even family. This subversive assault on the consciousness of the west through academia has been specifically put in place to achieve certain goals. It was the Frankfurt School theorists who poisoned the well of Western academic institutions which churn out generation after generation of indoctrinated robots regurgitating their skewed version of past and present. This is done by not just the media but advertising, schools and just about every form communication and expression.
People are taught and clearly understand that if for example Germany had won the war then they would have used propaganda and re education to tailor society to what they wanted. but the same people (just about everyone) has no clue or interest in that the same tactics are being used today. This is no hidden conspiracy. Those doing it are open and proud of their work. their are countless interviews with the agencies hired and they even boast about it on their company websites. Its just that the population itself doesn’t want to know.
What is the Overton window
The Overton window is the range of ideas tolerated in public discourse.The term is named after Joseph P. Overton, who stated that an idea’s political viability depends mainly on whether it falls within this range, rather than on politicians’ individual preferences. According to Overton, the window contains the range of policies that a politician can recommend without appearing too extreme to gain or keep public office in the current climate of public opinion.
Serious politicians can only act within the acceptable range. Shifting the Overton Window involves proponents/agencies of policies outside the window persuading the public to move and/or expand it. Proponents of current policies, or similar ones, within the window seek to convince people that policies outside it should be deemed unacceptable. The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum—even encourage the more critical and dissident views. That gives people the sense that there’s free thinking going on, while all the time the presuppositions of the system are being reinforced by the limits put on the range of the debate.
Again we will highlight homosexuality. Roughly 25 years ago the British National party in UK was condemning it’s practice and running on a platform to ban it outright. Something which even before it became illegal to criticise they dropped as it had fallen so far outside of the Overton window it was politically pointless to pursue. Using the BNP futher as a example and this no doubt goes for most Nationalist parties and right wing groups. Forceful repatriation of non ethnic Europeans. As little as 17 years ago this was still thought of as a election winner and viable solution to the ills of the west, but now only the day dream of the most extreme fringe micro orgs. While still legal to advocate for its so far outside of the Overton window that it’s utterly pointless to champion.
As powerful as Western governments are even they like to outsource their most important work and shifting the Overton window in their preferred direction is about as important as it gets. It’s well known and documented that Saatchi & Saatchi where hired by the Blair Government in UK to shift public opinion on a range of important issues. and today right across the west Hundreds of agencies are hired on long & short term contracts to completely change the public’s collective psyche. This is why ORDER15 advocates a different path for serious political thinkers and activists. Even if a traditionalist/patriotic/Nationalist party is able to find itself in opposition or say the third largest party it still has to continually water down its policies to stay relevant and within the Overton window. The Front National in France is key example of this becoming little more than a 1980s conservative party and still they haven’t managed electoral success in terms of the presidency.
So the electoral path is totally fruitless for our aims. One can only imagine in some decades so called Nationalist parties will have gone from trying to in prison gays to fighting to keep opposite sex relations legal it really is that severe a utopia we could be headed towards.
The traditionalist rights resources are woefully limited and putting all its time and said resources into fighting this losing battle electorally is a crime all in itself. Its understood we are fighting a losing battle against demographics but we are also fighting the clock against the public’s ever shifting mindset, one we simply can not keep up with.
Unfortunately, the European mindset refuses to face the reality, as if the challenge is too severe to be addressed.
It is a false Marxist notion among young brain washed people here in Europe that if you are successful or comfortable, it can only have been at the expense of humanity: “If I win, somebody else must lose.” There seems to be no concept at all of “win-win” — “If I win, all of you can win too: everyone can win!” — which underpins the free economy and has lifted so much of the world so spectacularly out of poverty.
It is important to… reject the current fashion of self-abasement. Europe seems to be afflicted with a skepticism about the future, as if the decline of the West is actually a justified punishment and a liberation from its faults of the past…. “For me, today,” notes Alain Finkielkraut, “the most essential thing is European civilization”.
The price for cultural relativism has become painfully visible in Europe. The disintegration of Western nation-states is now a real possibility. Multiculturalism — built on a background of demographic decline, massive de-Christianization and cultural self-repudiation — is nothing more than a transitional phase that risks leading to the fragmentation of the West.
Europe presents itself as the vanguard of the unification of humanity. Europe’s cultural roots, as a result, have been put at risk. According to Pierre Manent, a renowned French political scientist and a professor at the School for Advanced Studies in the Social Sciences in Paris:
“European pride or European self-consciousness depend on the rejection of European history and European civilization! We want nothing to do with the Christian roots and we absolutely want to be perfectly welcoming to Islam”.
Manent delivered these words to the French monthly, Causeur. He cited, as an example, Turkey:
“It was very clear that not only was its massively Islamic character (even before Erdogan) not an obstacle but a sort of motive, a reason to bring the Turkey into the EU. It would finally have been the definitive proof that Europe had detached itself and freed itself from its Christian dependence”.
Since European security ministers failed to agree on the Mediterranean refugee crisis, Italy’s Interior Minister Matteo Salvini, willing to stand virtually alone, chose to close Italian ports. Although Italian court tried to charge him with “kidnapping” migrants, Salvini’s policy worked and landings plummeted. In the first two months of 2019, 262 seaborne migrants reached Italy, compared to 5,200 in the same period last year, and more than 13,000 in the same period of 2017.
The Italian government collapsed on August 20; there is now the great possibility that a new pro-immigration leftist coalition will take its place. A ship attempting to bring to Italy 356 migrants from Africa, more than all who came in the first two months, has been stranded at sea since it picked up the migrants between August 9-12, while awaiting permission to land. In one standoff after another, NGOs have been attempting to break Salvini’s barricade against illegal immigration.
One ship already did. One of the captains of the Sea Watch 3, a German citizen, Pia Klemp, was even honored by the city of Paris for breaking the Italian blockade. According to the other far-left German captain, Carola Rackete: “My life was easy… I am white, German, born in a rich country and with the right passport” — as if her determination to help migrants would be, in her own words, related to the comparatively privileged life she has lived in the West.
Unfortunately, the price for cultural relativism has become painfully visible in Europe. The disintegration of Western nation-states is now a real possibility. Multiculturalism — built on a background of demographic decline, massive de-Christianization and cultural self-repudiation — is nothing more than a transitional phase that risks leading to the fragmentation of the West. Among the reasons for that, the historian David Engels listed “mass-migration, the aging of the population, Islamization and the dissolution of nation states”.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s policy of open doors — “Wir schaffen das” (“We can do it”) — led to a right-wing party in her parliament. The Alternative for Germany (AfD) is now leading the polls in regional elections in the former East Germany. The French Socialist Party, which governed the country under President François Hollande, is now disappearing. The diktats of Brussels on immigration and quotas have broken the unity of Europe and resulted in the virtual “secession” of the Visegrad countries (Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovakia). The migration utopia in Sweden brought a populist right-wing party into parliament, and the arrival of half a million illegal immigrants pushed the once-marginal League of Matteo Salvini to the top of Italy’s political establishment.
“In late 2015, the UK Leave campaign started putting up placards which showed the exodus of refugees from Syria and other countries through the Balkans, and adorned them with slogans like ‘Breaking Point’ and ‘Take Back Control’. With Ms. Merkel declaring an open-door policy, the message hit home for millions of worried Britons and Europeans. Not coincidentally, it was around this time that support for Brexit began to tick up”.
Instead of crying at “populism” and “nationalism” all the time, might Europe rethink its decision?
Whether one likes it or not, Europe seems to be feeling an existential cultural threat from these great migratory flows. There is not only the pressure of illegal immigration; there is also pressure from legal immigration. More than 100,000 people applied for asylum in France in 2017, a “historic” number, and more than 123,000 applications in 2018. In Germany, there were 200,000 requests for asylum in 2018.
This mass immigration is changing Europe’s internal composition. In Antwerp, the second-largest city in Belgium and the capital of Flanders, half the children in elementary schools are Muslim. In the Brussels region, you can get some idea of the change by studying the attendance of religion classes in primary and secondary schools: 15.6% attend Catholic classes, 4.3% Protestant and Orthodox classes, 0.2% attend Judaism classes, and 51.4% attend Islamic religion classes (12.8% attend secular “ethics” classes). Is it clearer now what will happen in the capital of the European Union? We should not be surprised that immigration tops the list of worries of the Belgian population.
Marseille, the second-largest city in France, is already 25% Muslim. Rotterdam, the second-largest city in the Netherlands, is 20% Muslim. Birmingham, the second-largest city in Britain, is 27% Muslim. It is estimated that in one generation, a third of the citizens of Vienna will be Muslim. “Sweden is in a situation that no modern country in the West has ever found itself in”, observed Christopher Caldwell. According to the Pew Research Center, Sweden might well be 30% Muslim by 2050; and 21% Muslim in the unlikely event that the flow of immigrants stops altogether. Today, 30% percent of Sweden’s babies have foreign-born mothers. The city of Leicester in the UK is presently 20% Muslim. In Luton, out of 200,000 inhabitants, 50,000 are Muslim. Most of the population growth in France between 2011 and 2016 was driven by the country’s large urban areas. At the top are Lyon, Toulouse, Bordeaux and the Paris area, according to a study published by the French National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies. In Lyon, there are about 150,000 Muslims out of a population of 400,000. According to one article, 18% of the newborns in France carry a name that is Muslim. During the 1960s, the number was 1%.
In the most credible scenario, the percentages of Muslims in Europe in 2050 are estimated to be: France (18%), UK (17.2%), Netherlands (15.2%), Belgium (18.2%), Italy (14.1%), Germany (19.7%), Austria (19.9%), Norway (17%). 2050 is just over the horizon. What, then, is to be expected in two or three generations, when the late historian Bernard Lewis said that Europe would, “at the very latest“, be Islamic ?
Unfortunately, the European mindset refuses to face the reality, as if the challenge is too severe to be addressed. “The unstoppable progression of this system makes me think of a tea on board the Titanic”, prominent French philosopher Alain Finkielkraut writes.
“It is not by turning a blind eye to tragedy that it will be prevented from happening. What will be the face of France in fifty years? What will the cities of Mulhouse, Roubaix, Nantes, Angers, Toulouse, Tarascon, Marseille and the whole Seine Saint-Denis department look like?”
If the population changes, the culture follows. As the author Éric Zemmour points out, “after a certain number, quantity becomes quality”.
While the power of European Christianity seems to be falling off a demographic and cultural cliff, Islam is making giant strides. It is not just a question of immigration and birth rates; it is also one of influence. “In September 2002 there was a meeting of the cultural centers of the leading European Union member states in Brussels”, the German-Syrian intellectual Bassam Tibi, Professor Emeritus of International Relations at the University of Göttingen, wrote.
“The conference took place under the theme ‘Penser l’Europe’ [‘Thinking of Europe’] while being given the title ‘Islam en Europe’. There, There some were disturbed to hear Tariq Ramadan speaking of Europe as dar al-Shahada, i.e. house of Islamic belief. The attending audience was alarmed, but did not get the message of the perception of Europe in an Islamist mindset as a part of house of Islam. If Europe is no longer perceived as dar al-Harb/house of war, but viewed as part of the peaceful house of Islam, then this is not a sign of moderation, as some wrongly assume: it is the mindset of an Islamization of Europe…”
The good news is…. Well there is no good news sure nothing is set in stone. Europeans could still decide for themselves how many immigrants their societies need. They could put in place a solution that is coherent rather than chaotic. They could still rediscover their Odinist / Christian heritage. They could resume having children and they could launch a real program of integration for the immigrants already in Europe. But none of these steps, necessary to avoid the transformation of large parts of the continent and its falling apart, is taking place.
It is important to listen to Pierre Manent’s prognosis and to reject the current fashion of self-abasement. Europe seems to be afflicted with a skepticism about the future, as if the decline of the West is actually a justified punishment and a liberation from its faults of the past. As a political solution fades to black those on the traditional right have to look at other options and when i say other i mean outside of the 2 dimensional paradigm of electoral politics and street demonstrations. These tried and worn out tools of the right are simply no longer viable course of action. ORDER15 has been criticised in the past for being too far right or to this or too that. But as orgs come and go our message refines, we stay the course we are the alternative. The decent minded can no longer afford to rest the future of western civilisation in the hands of the electorate. The majority has spoken and they resoundingly reject patriotism / nationalism and traditionalism This bulk of society not only outnumbers us free thinkers but they have the backing of the state, and with each year that passes their agenda and grip strengthens while ours diminish. That is why i firmly believe that we must model ourselves on existing successful powerful global orgs that currently rule. They rule not by the ballot box or placard nor by the fist. They rule by handshakes and favours, they rule by inter marriage and brotherhood. They rule in secret. They don’t openly tell the people who they are and what they want to achieve because the people would even now in this demented age still reject them as they reject us. They rule by slight of hand and secrecy. and if we wish to exist in any meaningful capacity come centuries end we must emulate and surpass this system of control.
“For me, today,” notes Finkielkraut, “the most essential thing is European civilization”.
Way before ORDER15 i joined the BNP back in 1998 and If you have been involved in politics half as long as i have you will know that almost everything done in the political world is not for the reasons given. Remainers are in full cry against the government’s decision to prorogue parliament. Their accusation of it being an “undemocratic” move is wrong and, frankly, besides the point. Their fear that the prime minister is using the prorogation as a means to achieve a no-deal Brexit is also wrong. Here’s why.
Boris Johnson has repeatedly stated that he wants a deal with the EU. He wrote a beseeching letter to the president of the European council, Donald Tusk, on 19 August making it clear that, if the Irish/Northern Irish backstop were to be removed, the UK would be able to achieve a deal.
The backstop is a construct of the withdrawal agreement. To stress the point, it does not exist in isolation. By implication, he was making it clear that without it he would be content with the rest of that reckless agreement organised by his predecessor in Number 10, Theresa May.
Moreover, there is simply not enough time before 31 October for a new agreement to be negotiated. The only deal on the table is one that already exists. And, finally, if he were wishing to force through a no-deal Brexit he would have sought a prorogation which neutered parliament until and beyond the critical date of 31 October – he did not.
The prime minister’s aim is quite different. He wishes to put maximum pressure on the EU to remove the backstop, and then to use the short window of time between 14 October, when parliament will reconvene, and 31 October to bounce parliament into approving the withdrawal agreement, using the threat of no deal in order to prevail.
The agreement is the equivalent of politically and economically surrendering the UK to the EU. There are too many to be able to list in this short piece, but some examples are particularly worrying.
The deal would lock the UK into abiding by EU regulations on state aid, VAT, employment law, and other tax matters. It would require the UK to open its territorial waters to the EU for fishing. It would require the UK’s financial services sector to maintain equivalence with the EU, without being able to influence the legislation produced by the EU. And, perhaps the most alarming threat: it would effectively empower the European court of justice to be the supreme authority in determining any legal disputes arising from the agreement.
None of the above makes any account of the huge sums of money we would be handing over and the value of assets we would be leaving behind. By my estimation, this is well north of €50bn.
Moreover, once signed, there is no get-out clause from the withdrawal agreement. It would be governed by international convention on treaties, making it virtually impossible for the UK to ever terminate it unilaterally. The UK would be subjugated to the EU in perpetuity.
The far left extremist anti-Brexit lobby wishes to remain in the EU, but I do not imagine for a moment that they would wish the UK to sign up to the deal on the table. So, with all of the above in consideration, remainers and Brexiteers must unite and stand resolutely against Boris Johnson’s government if it seeks to sell the UK down the drain by signing us up to the withdrawal agreement, only of course thats not going to happen is it ? Almost like the whole thing is sewn up from the beginning. Which ever way it goes i think it will only reinforce our own view and mandate for a parallel society.
In China, it’s becoming common for subjects of the Communist state’s growing digital apparatus to be denied air travel or business class train tickets, have their internet bandwidth throttled, have their kids denied admission to better schools, denied employment in certain sectors, or even have their dogs taken away. It’s called “social credit,” it’s kept track of digitally and with zero transparency, and Beijing is trotting it out in stages by 2020 as a sort-of kinder, gentler totalitarianism.
Think of it as a digital Stasi. Your neighbor catches you smoking in a non-smoking area, and reports on you with his phone. The state telecom notices you’re spending too much time playing online videogames. Your latest social media post gets too many downvotes. Or maybe someone at work you’re having problems with just makes something up. It could be almost anything, but once your social credit score turns negative, your life can become a living hell, and with no legal recourse. You’ll have to become a conspicuously good little Communist to turn your credit positive again.
Or as the government itself says, “Keeping trust is glorious and breaking trust is disgraceful.”
Silicon Valley says: “Hold my soy latte.”
In a piece headlined “Uh-oh: Silicon Valley is building a Chinese-style social credit system,” Fast Company’s Mike Elgan reports on similar, albeit extralegal efforts to create something similar right here in the West.
Ever gotten out of an Uber and given your driver a low rating because his car was dirty or he drove unsafely? Well, he can rate, you too, as can other “gig” service providers. Elgan writes:
Airbnb—a major provider of travel accommodation and tourist activities—bragged in March that it now has more than 6 million listings in its system. That’s why a ban from Airbnb can limit travel options.
Airbnb can disable your account for life for any reason it chooses, and it reserves the right to not tell you the reason. The company’s canned message includes the assertion that “This decision is irreversible and will affect any duplicated or future accounts. Please understand that we are not obligated to provide an explanation for the action taken against your account.” The ban can be based on something the host privately tells Airbnb about something they believe you did while staying at their property. Airbnb’s competitors have similar policies.
It’s now easy to get banned by Uber, too. Whenever you get out of the car after an Uber ride, the app invites you to rate the driver. What many passengers don’t know is that the driver now also gets an invitation to rate you. Under a new policy announced in May: If your average rating is “significantly below average,” Uber will ban you from the service.
Most anything is ratable by your driver, and Uber’s decisions are final.
Canadian firm PatronScan helps restaurants keep digital track of their customers, so you might want to remove that MAGA hat before coming into view of any security cameras. In New York, the state’s Department of Financial Services has given the A-OK to insurance companies scanning your social media for ”bad behavior” with higher premiums for anyone flaunting their naughtiness. On the flip side, “a Facebook post showing you doing yoga might save you money.”
I can imagine a very near future with SnapChap filters that automatically filter out cigars, cocktails, patriotic symbols, and belly fat, just in case Big Brother really is watching.
On second thought, maybe you’d better rethink that SnapChat filter. It’s just as easy to imagine a world in which insurance companies are allowed to cancel your policy if they catch you posting fakes.
ORDER15 and indeed our followers are no stranger to being black listed (shadow banned) Having had successful accounts on twitter and instagram that grew by 20 to 30 likes per day for years to stalling to zero despite the content remaining the same and continuing to grow on every other platform. Michelle Malkin revealed last Thursday that she had “triggered” Google’s social credit system. According to a whistleblower, Malkin’s popular michellemalkin.com has been digital-blacklisted by the search & data giant:
Armed with internal memos and emails, former Google software engineer Zachary Vorhies exposed how MichelleMalkin.com (online since 1999) was placed on a news blacklist banning my content from appearing on newsfeeds accessed through Android Google products. I do not advocate violence, publish porn or indulge in vulgarity or profanity (other than my occasional references to Beltway crapweasels). But I triggered the Google Social Credit System and there’s no going back.
Android is “free,” with the operating system powering something like 80% of the world’s mobile devices, but clearly, it isn’t without cost to free-thinking users.
That’s not all. Malkin’s whistleblower revealed that Google has similarly blacklisted Twitchy, FrontPage, The Daily Caller, Info war’s, Legal Insurrection, The British National party, NewsBusters, American Thinker, LifeNews, and more. These are all conservative voices, and none can be found among the many far-leftwing and Communist sites promoted by Google’s mobile newsfeed. Chances are, if you weren’t already aware of These conservative sites the world’s near-monopoly search engine won’t help you find them.
In Communist China, digital social control — let’s call it what it really is, shall we? — is being built by the State, for the State. In the West, progressive/Marxist-run tech and social media giants are doing the job the government can’t.
Either way, the endgame is essentially totalitarian — to control what you can see, what you can do, and what you can think, and for the majority of the western Electorate it can’t come soon enough. This is why we firmly believe its time Traditionalists woke up and abandon the majority to their joyfully chosen fate and go our own way.
Jeffrey Epstein is the latest in a long list of Clinton family associates and acquaintances who died mysteriously or committed suicide before their public testimony.
In 2016 CBS Las Vegas posted a list of Bill and Hillary Clinton associates alleged to have died under mysterious circumstances.
Here is that list.
1- James McDougal – Clintons convicted Whitewater partner died of an apparent heart attack, while in solitary confinement. He was a key witness in Ken Starr’s investigation.
2 – Mary Mahoney – A former White House intern was murdered July 1997 at a Starbucks Coffee Shop in Georgetown .. The murder …happened just after she was to go public w:th her story of sexual harassment in the White House.
3 – Vince Foster – Former White House counselor, and colleague of Hillary Clinton at Little Rock’s Rose Law firm. Died of a gunshot wound to the head, ruled a suicide.
4 – Ron Brown – Secretary of Commerce and former DNC Chairman. Reported to have died by impact in a plane crash. A pathologist close to the investigation reported that there was a hole in the top of Brown’s skull resembling a gunshot wound. At the time of his death Brown was being investigated, and spoke publicly of his willingness to cut a deal with prosecutors. The rest of the people on the plane also died. A few days later the Air Traffic controller commited suicide.
5 – C. Victor Raiser, II – Raiser, a major player in the Clinton fund raising organization died in a private plane crash in July 1992.
6 – Paul Tulley – Democratic National Committee Political Director found dead in a hotel room in Little Rock , September 1992. Described by Clinton as a “dear friend and trusted advisor”.
7 – Ed Willey – Clinton fundraiser, found dead November 1993 deep in the woods in VA of a gunshot wound to the head. Ruled a suicide. Ed Willey died on the same day his wife Kathleen Willey claimed Bill Clinton groped her in the oval office in the White House. Ed Willey was involved in several Clinton fund raising events.
8 – Jerry Parks – Head of Clinton’s gubernatorial security team in Little Rock .. Gunned down in his car at a deserted intersection outside Little Rock Park’s son said his father was building a dossier on Clinton He allegedly threatened to reveal this information. After he died the files were mysteriously removed from his house.
9 – James Bunch – Died from a gunshot suicide. It was reported that he had a “Black Book” of people which contained names of influential people who visited prostitutes in Texas and Arkansas
10 – James Wilson – Was found dead in May 1993 from an apparent hanging suicide. He was reported to have ties to Whitewater..
11 – Kathy Ferguson – Ex-wife of Arkansas Trooper Danny Ferguson, was found dead in May 1994, in her living room with a gunshot to her head. It was ruled a suicide even though there were several packed suitcases, as if she were going somewhere. Danny Ferguson was a co-defendant along with Bill Clinton in the Paula Jones lawsuit Kathy Ferguson was a possible corroborating witness for Paula Jones.
12 – Bill Shelton – Arkansas State Trooper and fiancee of Kathy Ferguson. Critical of the suicide ruling of his fiancee, he was found dead in June, 1994 of a gunshot wound also ruled a suicide at the grave site of his fiancee.
13 – Gandy Baugh – Attorney for Clinton’s friend Dan Lassater, died by jumping out a window of a tall building January, 1994. His client was a convicted drug distributor.
14 – Florence Martin – Accountant & sub-contractor for the CIA, was related to the Barry Seal, Mena, Arkansas, airport drug smuggling case. He died of three gunshot wounds.
15 – Suzanne Coleman – Reportedly had an affair with Clinton when he was Arkansas Attorney General. Died of a gunshot wound to the back of the head, ruled a suicide. Was pregnant at the time of her death.
16 – Paula Grober – Clinton’s speech interpreter for the deaf from 1978 until her death December 9, 1992. She died in a one car accident. 17 – Danny Casolaro – Investigative reporter, investigating Mena Airport and Arkansas Development Finance Authority. He slit his wrists, apparently, in the middle of his investigation.
18 – Paul Wilcher – Attorney investigating corruption at Mena Airport with Casolaro and the 1980 “October Surprise” was found dead on a toilet June 22, 1993, in his Washington DC apartment had delivered a report to Janet Reno 3 weeks before his death.
19 – Jon Parnell Walker – Whitewater investigator for Resolution Trust Corp. Jumped to his death from his Arlington ,Virginia apartment balcony August 15, 1993. He was investigating the Morgan Guaranty scandal.
20 – Barbara Wise – Commerce Department staffer. Worked closely with Ron Brown and John Huang. Cause of death: Unknown. Died November 29, 1996. Her bruised, naked body was found locked in her office at the Department of Commerce.
21 – Charles Meissner – Assistant Secretary of Commerce who gave John Huang special security clearance, died shortly thereafter in a small plane crash.
22 – Dr. Stanley Heard – Chairman of the National Chiropractic Health Care Advisory Committee died with his attorney Steve Dickson in a small plane crash. Dr. Heard, in addition to serving on Clinton ‘s advisory council personally treated Clinton’s mother, stepfather and brother.
23 – Barry Seal – Drug running TWA pilot out of Mena Arkansas, death was no accident.
24 – Johnny Lawhorn, Jr. – Mechanic, found a check made out to Bill Clinton in the trunk of a car left at his repair shop. He was found dead after his car had hit a utility pole.
25 – Stanley Huggins – Investigated Madison Guaranty. His death was a purported suicide and his report was never released.
26 – Hershell Friday – Attorney and Clinton fundraiser died March 1, 1994, when his plane exploded.
27 – Kevin Ives & Don Henry – Known as “The boys on the track” case. Reports say the boys may have stumbled upon the Mena Arkansas airport drug operation. A controversial case, the initial report of death said, due to falling asleep on railroad tracks. Later reports claim the 2 boys had been slain before being placed on the tracks. Many linked to the case died before their testimony could come before a Grand Jury.
THE FOLLOWING PERSONS HAD INFORMATION ON THE IVES/HENRY CASE:
28 – Keith Coney – Died when his motorcycle slammed into the back of a truck, 7/88.
30 – Gregory Collins – Died from a gunshot wound January 1989.
31 – Jeff Rhodes – He was shot, mutilated and found burned in a trash dump in April 1989.
32 – James Milan – Found decapitated. However, the Coroner ruled his death was due to natural causes”.
34 – Richard Winters – A suspect in the Ives/Henry deaths. He was killed in a set-up robbery July 1989.
THE FOLLOWING CLINTON BODYGUARDS ARE ALSO DEAD 35 – Major William S. Barkley, Jr. 36 – Captain Scott J . Reynolds 37 – Sgt. Brian Hanley 38 – Sgt. Tim Sabel 39 – Major General William Robertson 40 – Col. William Densberger 41 – Col. Robert Kelly 42 – Spec. Gary Rhodes 43 – Steve Willis 44 – Robert Williams 45 – Conway LeBleu 46 – Todd McKeehan
And the most recent, Seth Rich, the DC staffer murdered and “robbed” (of nothing) on July 10. Wikileaks found Assange claims he had info on the DNC email scandal.
And now you can add multi-millionaire Jeffrey Epstein to the list.
1. Plant a garden : This is the basic building block for O15 members and traditionalists in general looking to walk a simpler path in life in the modern world. Especially with rising fuel costs and resulting food costs increases it is imperative to minimize the impact on a families financial situation. More and more of the average families monthly income is slowly being eroded by the cost of just putting food on the table. Most of our members are farmers or landowners but I understand a lot of people in the wider traditionalist movement do not have a lot of land to totally grow their own food but there are many options available to grow in small footprint and help at least offset the cost of groceries. Besides it also helps develop ones skills for any future plans.
2. Learn how to can your own food : This goes hand in hand with planting a garden, a garden will produce way to much food at one time for any family to consume it all before it goes to waste. Having the skills to be able to preserve what you produce is imperative for a families long term self sufficiency. If your garden is to small at the moment to produce enough food to put away in the pantry there are other options available. Search out and visit farmers markets, talk to the farmers about buying in bulk which can save you some money. Ask the farmers about gleaning the fields after harvest time. A lot of farmers will allow people to harvest produce that has been leftover and missed after the commercial harvesting is done. Look into a local produce supplier for restaurants. Most of them have a walk in window where people can go in and buy bulk produce. You can buy a 25 pound case of tomatoes for about 18 dollars right now which is a huge cost savings over the grocery store and that would make quite a few jars of spaghetti sauce.
3. Plant a herb garden : Have you seen how much both fresh and dried herbs are at the grocery store are? It’s insane. The amount of space needed to raise a small herb garden is minimal and there is nothing like fresh herbs you don’t even need a garden for this your window ledge is perfect.
4. Get a dehydrator : Dehydrating Food and Canning go hand in hand. The options you have with a dehydrator is only limited by your imagination. You can make jerky, fruit roll ups, dehydrate eggs, etc. Fruits make a tasty healthy snack for young and old. Most locations in the country have local orchards that are a great place to buy fruits cheaply and dehydrated apple slices sprinkled with cinnamon last a long time on the pantry shelf and are delicious.
5. Plant Perennials you can eat : Growing up as a child in a small town in we did not have a farm, but we did have a decent sized garden space and perennials that supplied a food source each year with no work on our part. Asparagus, Rhubarb, Strawberries, Jerusalem Artichokes. etc.
6. Plant soft fruits : Along with strawberries also plant raspberries, blackberries, blueberries etc.. They do no take up a lot of space and will produce fresh and tasty fruits year after year
7. Plant a few fruit trees : with modern day dwarf varieties that are available on the market today you can plant a few fruit trees that with pruning and training will be bountiful in several years without taking up much room at all.
8. Learn to save seeds : Buy heirloom open-pollinated seeds and learn to save the seeds from this years produce to be able to plant next year. I know a Mormon family who support us that have been passing their seed stock down through the family for over 100 years and haven’t had to buy a seed ever.
9. Raise a few small backyard animals : The amount of space required by a small flock of chickens or rabbit hutch is minimal and is a great source for nutrients for you and your backyard farm. There is nothing better than making breakfast or a cake with eggs fresh from the source. Plus they are a great asset with help keeping bugs and insects in check and will gladly take care of any extra vegetables or fruit from the garden for you.
10. Compost everything : People think compost is smelly and disgusting. If your compost is creating a nuisance smell, you are doing it wrong. It is estimated that 30 to 40 percent of food Americans buy ends up in the trash heap. Any waste from leftovers either goes into to the compost pile by either being fed to the chickens and after working its way through the chickens ends up in the compost bin or we will put it directly in the piles. All raked leaves, newspaper, cardboard, weeds, grass clippings etc goes directly into our compost pile.
11. Waste not want not : Touching on the estimate of amount of food thrown out, learn to cook only what someone is able to eat. Unless you are making a big pot of chili to can and put in the pantry, why use all the time, energy and money to make something that you will end up throwing away.
12. Cook from scratch : The average Westerner has lost touch with what food actually is. Most people think that food comes out of a box and sadly it usually does for a large percentage of Westerners in today’s world. Pick up several basic cookbooks and experiment with turning your backyard bounty into healthy, nutritious and tasty meals for your O15 house or family.
13. Learn to make your own alcohol : Cider, Wine and Beer. They are simple to make and you can make them for a fraction of what it costs to buy the mass produced product available in the stores today. I listed them in the order that I believe is the easiest to make in your own home. Wine you can make out of just about anything, even things that you would never think of such as tomatoes, carrots, pumpkin and dandelions. Experimenting is half the fun in my opinion.
14. Learn to hunt and fish : Wild game is a great way to add a healthy protein option into your home for not a lot of money. There is nothing I like better than a nice lean venison steak or a cornmeal battered catfish fish fry. You can easily can wild game as well in a pressure canner to make it shelf stable.
15. Start a small Apiary : This is one of the projects of the short list of things I want to do. From a sustainability stand point bees are the little helpers of the garden and orchard that most people despise out of fear. These little workers will pollinate your plants, produce fresh honey, create bees wax for soap making, candle making, furniture polish, etc.. If i finally get to it ill be sure to let you guys know but if you beat me to it be sure and tag us in some of your pictures.
16. Rainwater Collection: In a few hours you can quickly establish a rain water collection system. One inch of rain will give you .6 gallons of water per square foot of roof space. Depending on your space and average rain fall you can build a simple 50 gallon system up to several thousand gallons. We use our rainwater for watering the garden and animals and it costs us nothing except for the initial cost of the system.
17. Make your own dairy products : Dairy products such as cheese, yogurt, butter and ice cream are going through the roof right now and it is one of the simpler things to make in your kitchen. It is a fun project to get the kids involved with as well.
18. Grind your own flour and Bake your own bread : there are several grinders on the market today that will easily convert wheat berries into whole flour. The added benefit is wheat berries if properly stored will last much longer than flour in the pantry and you have the added benefit of capturing all the nutritional value of the wheat. Not the bleached product available on the market today that has been processed so much there is little if any nutritional value left in it. You can also grind your own cornmeal to make corn bread with. There is nothing better than a thick slab of homemade bread that you created from a raw product lathered with your own homemade butter.
19. Set up a clothes line : One of the largest electrical drains on a homes monthly electric bill is the electric dryer. The average consumer spends money on chemicals and products to mimic that fresh spring smell. Guess what, you can hang your clothes up on a clothes line, save money on electricity and get that fresh spring smell for free!
20. Make your own soaps: Hand soap. dish detergent and laundry detergent can be made for pennies on the dollar compared to the mass produced product available on the market today. There was a news report recently where Tide is becoming a hot commodity for theft by shoplifting because of the rise in prices.
21. Start a worm farm : Worms are another little helper around the homestead that are worth their weight in gold. They help compost and is one of the best ways to help enrich your soil. You can use them to create a fertilizer tea that is one of the best organic fertilizers you can use in your backyard. You could also use them for those fish your going to catch right ?
22. Build a smoker : Smoking meats, vegetables and cheeses is a great hobby and adds a tremendous amount of flavor for next to nothing that will be a welcome addition to your recipes and meals.
23. Cut your own hair : For me this is simple, I have had a buzz cut since I was a teen and for the cost of a decent pair of clippers you can save the 20 dollars a month.
24. Re-purpose Everything: I hate throwing things out. I don’t consider myself a pack rat but if I can use a item for another purpose I will do it. It saves on a trash bill and will save on the cost of purchasing something new.
25. Try and live debt free as much as possible: Debt is slavery. We as traditionalists spend way to much of our hard earned dollars on interest. This is a little tricky though. but try to get into the habbit of not buying something unless you can save the money to afford it, and try to use cash as often as possible.
26. Look into Alternative Energy Sources : This can be as expensive as someone is willing to spend. Most people think alternative energy sources as solar panels and this is one piece of the puzzle but something as simple as installing a wood stove which would have a huge impact on a persons heating bill and dependency on foreign oil. The nice thing about wood heat is it has the ability to heat you twice, the day you cut and split it and the day you burn it. You just can’t beat the heat from a wood stove in my opinion.
You’re in your late-20’s, mid-30’s; you’re married and have three young kids. together and another on the way, you live in a large house in the countryside. the house could use renovating, but it doesn’t need it.
wildflowers grow all over your large property. bees buzz by, but never sting. they make honey for your family to sell or trade and enjoy.
in your backyard is a garden. you and your spouse wear overalls and bandanas while you harvest the fruits and vegetables you’ve worked so hard on; you sell or trade whatever you don’t eat.
next to the garden is a pasture: you raise cows, bunnies, sheep, and chickens. you’ve taught your children to collect eggs every morning, while you and your spouse milk the cows.
although you have technology, wifi, and service, your family doesn’t rely on it for entertainment and communication. you play board games, read books, and write letters.
Your house is your own. you fall asleep in the arms of the person you love, happily content with life.
Beautiful dream right ? perfect place to raise a family perfect place to live the western ideal but it doesn’t just have to be a dream. for most this is obtainable should the will be strong enough. Every once in a while you see a meme on social media being posted by one of your friends, it goes something like this.
But how many of the people posting this and claiming to wish they could have ever tried to get there ? The excuses normally range from if it wasn’t for my kids. or if it wasn’t for my Job id be going tomorrow. Money can be a issue but most responsible adults eventually own their own home so …. Something O15 often points out is with rural living its as much about making money from your farm or land as it is saving it. from the different life style like teaching your kids to swim in the lake rather than the expensive swimming house, to producing a decent % of your own food.
Find a partner that wants it as much as you do and just go because before you know it next year is 2070 and your new excuse is if i was only 30 years younger.
Rural living is traditional living. Its the best upbringing a child can get. far away from the gang violence that now plagues inner city and suburban western schools. Far away from the toxic air in our major cities. A place for children’s imagination to grow and traditionalist parents to find their natural purpose. Most of Order15’s membership are either farmers or landowners so here we really are speaking from the heart and practising what we preach. Need support, need advice then ask us We have been doing this for years some of us for life.
The question is will you find the strength to follow us and make that dream/meme a reality.
With the US renewed interest in starting another war in the middle east ORDER15 turns its attention to ”The business of war”. The business of war is profitable, very profitable In 2011, the 100 largest contractors sold $410 billion in arms and military services. Just 10 of those companies sold over $208 billion. Based on a list of the top 100 arms-producing and military services companies in 2011 compiled by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), 24/7 Wall St. reviewed the 10 companies with the most military sales worldwide.
These companies have benefited tremendously from the growth in military spending in the U.S., which by far has the largest military budget in the world. In 2000, the U.S. defense budget was approximately $312 billion. By 2011, the figure had grown to $712 billion. Arm sales grew alongside general defense spending growth. SIPRI noted that between 2002 and 2011, arms sales among the top 100 companies grew by 51%.
Many defense contractors are looking overseas to make up for slowing sales in the U.S. and Europe. Arms producers are especially keen on Latin America, the Middle East and parts of Asia, Jackson said. For instance, BAE is securing contracts with Saudi Arabia. Meanwhile, the chief financial officer of Northrop Grumman has recently indicated his company may sell its Global Hawk airplane to South Korea or Japan.
Based on the SIPRI report, 24/7 Wall St. reviewed the 10 biggest weapons companies. Arms were defined as sales to military customers, either for procurement or for export, but do not include sales of general purpose items, such as oil or computer equipment. We looked at sales figures for two years through 2011, among other metrics. Here are the 10 companies that profit the most from war:
10. United Technologies (UTX) — aircraft, electronics, engines Arm sales: $11.6 billion, total sales: $58.2 billion Gross profit: $5.3 billion, total workforce: 199,900 United Technologies makes a wide range of arms — notably military helicopters, including the Black Hawk helicopter for the U.S. Army and the Seahawk helicopter for the U.S. Navy. The company was the biggest employer in the top 10 though arms sales accounted for just 20% of revenue. UTX also produces elevators, escalators, air-conditioners and refrigerators. International sales comprised 60% of the company’s revenue in 2012.
9. L-3 Communications (LLL) — electronics Arm sales: $12.5 billion, total sales: $15.2 billion Gross profit: $956 million, total workforce: 61,000 Some 83% of L-3 Communications sales in 2011 came from arms sales, but this was down from what it sold the prior year. The company has four business segments: electronic systems; aircraft modernization and maintenance; national security solutions; and command, control, communications, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance. Among many products manufactured, the company has become a major provider of unmanned aircraft systems.
8. Finmeccanica — aircraft, artillery, engines, electronics, vehicles and missiles Arms sales, $14.6 billion, total sales: $24.1 billion Gross profit: $ -3.2 billion, total workforce: 70,470 Italian company Finmeccanica makes a wide range of arms, including helicopters and security electronics. Nearly 60% of the company’s sales in 2011 were in arms. Finmeccanica lost $3.2 billion in 2011. The Italian company is currently fending off allegation that it paid bribes to win an approximately $750 million contract to provide 12 military helicopters to the Indian government in 2010. The then-head of the company, Giuseppe Orsi, was arrested in February but has denied wrongdoing. Other executives, including the head of the company’s helicopter unit, have been replaced, and the company has delayed the release of recent financial results.
7. EADS — aircraft, electronics, missiles and space Arm sales: $16.4 billion, total sales: $68.3 billion Gross profit: $1.4 billion, total workforce: 133,120 The European Aeronautic Defense and Space Company (EADS), based in the Netherlands, had sales in 2011 roughly in line with the prior year. Arms sales comprised just 24% of the company’s revenue. EADS and BAE Systems unsuccessfully attempted to merge for $45 billion in 2012, which would have created the world’s largest aerospace company. The deal collapsed in October after German Chancellor Angela Merkel expressed concerns about the merger.
6. Northrop Grumman (NOC) — aircraft, electronics, missiles, ships, space Arm sales: $21.4 billion, total sales: $26.4 billion Gross profit: $2.1 billion, total workforce: 72,500 Northrop Grumman’s 2011 arms sales comprised about 81% of total sales even after a sharp decline in arms sales year over year. The company attributed the decline to reduced government spending on defense projects. Nevertheless, the company was more profitable than in the prior year.
5. Raytheon (RTN) — electronics, missiles Arm sales: $22.5 billion, total sales: $24.9 billion Gross profit: $1.9 billion, total workforce: 71,000 Raytheon, based in Waltham, Mass., is one of the largest defense contractors in the U.S. The company makes the Tomahawk Cruise Missile, among others. Arms sales comprised about 90% of the company’s sales in 2011 though they as a total they were lower than in the prior year. The slide hasn’t let up. Total sales in 2012 fell 1.5%, and Raytheon is expecting sales to fall 3% in 2013, a projection which doesn’t take into account the effects of mandated budget cuts. The company can rely on overseas customers to somewhat offset weak sales at home. As of January, approximately 40% of the company’s backlog was booked overseas. The company expects approximately a 5% increase in international sales in 2013.
4. General Dynamics (GD) — artillery, electronics, vehicles, small arms, ships Arm sales: $23.8 billion, total sales: $32.7 billion Gross profit: $2.5 billion, total workforce: 95,100 With 18,000 transactions in 2011, General Dynamics was the third-largest contractor to the U.S. government. Of those contracts, approximately $12.9 billion worth went to the Navy, while an additional $4.6 billion went to the Army. The company’s arms sales in 2011 comprised 73% of total sales. Arms sales in 2011 were slightly below 2010 levels. The company makes a host of products, including electric boats, tracked and wheeled military vehicles, and battle tanks. The company announced layoffs in early March, blaming mandated federal budget cuts.
3. BAE Systems — aircraft, artillery, electronics, vehicles, missiles, ships Arm sales: $29.2 billion, total sales: $30.7 billion Gross profit: $2.3 billion, total workforce: 93,500 BAE Systems was the largest non-U.S. company based on arms sales. Arms sales represented 95% of the company’s total sales in 2011 even though they were lower as a total of overall sales compared to the prior year. The products BAE sells include the L-ROD Bar Armor System that shields defense vehicles and the Hawk Advanced Jet Trainer that provides sophisticated simulation training for military pilots. In 2013, the company said its growth would likely come from outside the U.S. and Great Britain — its home market. BAE noted that its outlook for those two countries was “constrained,” likely due to the diminished presence in international conflicts and government budget cuts.
2. Boeing (BA) — aircraft, electronics, missiles, space Arm sales: $31.8 billion, total sales: $68.7 billion Gross profit: $4 billion, total workforce: 171,700 Boeing was the second-largest U.S. government contractor in 2011, with about $21.5 billion worth of goods contracted. The Chicago-based company makes a wide range of arms, including strategic missile systems, laser and electro-optical systems and global positioning systems. Despite all these technologies, just 46% of the company’s total sales of $68.7 billion in 2011 came from arms. Boeing is the largest commercial airplane manufacturer in the world, making planes such as the 747, 757 and recently, the 787 Dreamliner. The company is also known for its space technology — Boeing had $1 billion worth of contracts with NASA in 2011.
1. Lockheed Martin (LMT) — aircraft, electronics, missiles, space Arm sales:$36.3 billion, total sales: $46.5 billion Gross profit: $2.7 billion, total workforce, 123,000 Lockheed Martin notched $36.3 billion in sales in 2011, slightly higher than the $35.7 billion the company sold in 2010. The arms sales comprised 78% of the company’s total 2011 sales. Lockheed makes a wide range of products, including aircraft, missiles, unmanned systems and radar systems. The company and its employees have been concerned about the effects of the “fiscal cliff” and sequestration, the latter of which includes significant cuts to the U.S. Department of Defense. In the fall of 2012, the company planned on issuing layoff notices to all employees before backing down at the White House’s request.
All these companies have massive political influence not least through lobbying. Its not a secret its common practice and nothing benefits these companies more than a large scale conflict. Some on the right blinded by stupidity will be indifferent to wars outside of the west, even going so far as to support them in many cases ”the war on terror” and so on. But these wars destabilize whole countries and legitimize to a extent in some eyes millions of refugees/migrants/immigrants/asylum-seekers that then come into the west. One could argue that these appalling wars are perhaps the primary reason for the ever changing face of the west and all the social ills that come with it. Time that traditionalists really stood up and opposed war where ever it happens to be fought.
There is no question but that the populations of most European countries will decline in the next generation, and in the cases of Germany and Russia, the decline will be dramatic. In fact, the entire global population explosion is ending. In virtually all societies, from the poorest to the wealthiest, the birthrate among women has been declining. In order to maintain population stability, the birthrate must remain at 2.1 births per woman. Above that, and the population rises; below that, it falls. In the advanced industrial world, the birthrate is already suicidally below 2.1. In middle-tier countries such as Mexico or Turkey, the birthrate is falling but will not reach 2.1 until between 2040 and 2050. In the poorest countries, such as Bangladesh or Bolivia, the birthrate maybe falling, but it will take most of this century to reach 2.1. this disparity will have catastrophic effects not just for their own governments but their financial backers. ie the western tax payer.
The process is essentially irreversible. It is primarily forced by urbanization. In agricultural and low-level industrial societies, children are a productive asset. Children can be put to work at the age of 6 doing agricultural work or simple workshop labor. Children become a source of income, and the more you have the better. Just as important, since there is no retirement plan other than family in such societies, a large family can more easily support parents in old age.
In a mature urban society, the economic value of children declines. In fact, children turn from instruments of production into objects of massive consumption. In urban industrial society, not only are the opportunities for employment at an early age diminished, but the educational requirements also expand dramatically. Children need to be supported much longer, in most cases into their mid-20s. Children cost a tremendous amount of money with limited return, if any, for parents in the west the desire for the material world over rides all else . Thus, people have fewer children. Birth control provides the means to sustain this selfish utopia. For most hedonistic westerners a family of four children would be a financial & mental catastrophe. Therefore, women have two children or fewer, on average. As a result, the population contracts. Of course, there are other more sinister reasons for this decline in the west , but urban industrialism is vehicle used.
There are those and in growing number who foresee economic disaster in this process. the argument is that the contraction of the population, particularly during the transitional period before the older generations die off, will leave a relatively small number of workers supporting a very large group of retirees, particularly as life expectancy in advanced industrial countries increases. In addition, the debts incurred by the older generation would be left to the smaller, younger generation to pay off. Given this, the expectation is major economic dislocation. In addition, there is the view that a country’s political power will contract with the population, based on the assumption that the military force that could be deployed — and paid for — with a smaller population would contract. From a pro western prospective this is a suicidal disaster, not least because the vast majority of westerners are totally indifferent to the west’s future or lack of it. and those that are aware and alarmed simply don’t grasp the timing or the finality of it. ORDER15 goes some way to address this even to the point of offering cash incentives to members. The Hungarian government also recently providing money and support for families willing to have more children. However we have already passed the tipping point. It can not be corrected. The only question is will the wider pro western camp wake up in time to the reality of it and adapt accordingly.
Unlike all these other philosophies, True Nationalism has never been invented – it has been derived from the eternal Laws of Nature, which have existed as long as the universe and which have governed all life since the first primitive organism came into existence. This has been expressed beautifully and clearly by Savitri Devi, the famous late NS philosopher, in her book ‘The Lightning and the Sun’: “In its essence, the NS idea exceeds not only Germany and our time, but the ethno-euro and mankind itself and any epoch; it ultimately expresses that mysterious and unfailing wisdom according to which Nature lives and creates: the impersonal wisdom of the primeval forest and of the ocean depths and of the spheres in the dark fields of space; and it is AHs glory not merely to have gone back to that divine wisdom, but to have made it the practical regeneration policy of world-wide scope” In other words, it was not invented by AH, but is the conscious expression of the fundamental Laws of Nature governing our lives. It is based on an infinite love of the creation in all its diversity, a deep, unconditional respect for the wisdom of Nature, and an ardent will to preserve life as it has grown out of this wisdom. The only way to do so is to organise the society of man in accordance with these fundamental Laws. Either within the existing society where possible ? or within a parallel society like ours. Being against Nationalism is just as absurd and illogical as it would be to oppose the law of gravity or the fact that the earth is round! National Socialism is really nothing but the application of physical and biological laws to the political, economic, social, and religious areas of human life in the same way as they are today applied to technology. In this light, National Socialism is truly scientific – unlike any other world view. It does not wish to make reality fit any preconceived theories but to make the theories fit reality. New epoch making scientific landmarks would thus immediately be reflected in the practical life of a National Socialist community. Of course, we might sometimes wish that some of these Laws had been a little different, but we must necessarily accept that it would be impossible to change them. Laws of Nature cannot be abolished or amended through a vote in the General Assembly of the United Nations, the US Congress, or any other national parliament! Perhaps everything had been easier if all human beings and all races had been created equal, and if there had not been any hereditary factors governing and limiting our individual possibilities of development. However, that is not the case, and there is absolutely no chance of changing this fact by wishful thinking, i.e. by doing as if these Laws did not exist. To build a society on such wishful thinking is a deadly sin that can only have disastrous consequences. These consequences are seen only too clearly when we take a look at the societies that have been built by our enemies in East and West.
Unanimously they refer to Nationalism as the “Gospel of Evil” – while they themselves rule over a world on the brink of economic and moral disaster, a world afflicted by inflation, unemployment, crime, senseless violence, drug abuse, pollution, pornography, corruption, hunger, and ecological catastrophes – a world that has experienced only 26 days of peace since 1945 and where 30 million people have been butchered over the same period. And over this dreary world hovers the dreadful threat of a nuclear war that will destroy all higher life on earth. No wonder, indeed, that man lives in constant fear of what the next day has in store for him! Unfortunately, this fear and hopelessness is most widespread in the ethno-euro part of the world, where decadence and moral decay are most advanced. Here people have been totally alienated from all sound and natural values and made into mindless zombies, whose anxieties are soothed by material affluence – in a constant race against economic chaos. In spite of all the material goodies of the modern world, these people are neither happy nor satisfied. They completely lack ideals and enthusiasm and they have lost all faith in the future. The ethno-euro either can not afford to or is simply afraid to bring children into this world. As he sees no future, he prefers the luxuries of the moment to the preservation of his race and culture. He tries to secure as comfortable a life for himself as he can in this cesspool, and his only hope is that the inevitable catastrophe will not occur in his lifetime. Thus, he passively watches the land of his forefathers being slowly but steadily taken over by those, who do not yet realise that the end of the white man means the end of all civilisation.
This is the Golden Age our enemies promised the world in 1945 – this is what they have been able to build in the seventy years they have had absolute power. Under these circumstances the prospects for the future sure are gloomy. However, it does not have to be this way. Not for us not for Nationalists not for order15. We can of course continue to try to save our nations but there must be a back up there must be a plan B. I’m asking you to join me in building the parallel society of which is set out on the pages here on our website. We set about this task to insure that we not only survive but that we thrive into the future.