There are certain words in the English language that have been commandeered by our collective enemy, weaponized and then used against us to promote our destruction.
In this article, I want to address some of these important button words for the purpose of reclaiming them back into the common lexicon of English words and phrases. The power of these weaponized words is immense and should not be underestimated.
Currently, we are bludgeoned into silence with the words of our own language. Our forbearance, empathy and consideration for the opinion of others has been taken advantage of to the point that we are on the brink now of the irretrievable disappearance of ethnic Europeans.
The task of reclaiming our language is vitally important if we are ever to regain the freedom to effectively defend ourselves against the spurious slurs and false allegations made against us.
Some of these so weaponized words would include the following
Race, Conspiracy, Fanatic, Hate, Extremist and even the word “White” when used in the context of denoting our race.
Race,- Racist, Racism
First I will look at some dictionary definitions, old and new to see what has happened to the word over time.
From the 1981 edition of The Living Webster Encyclopaedic dictionary of the English language;
- A group of persons connected by common descent or origin. A family tribe or people.
- A major division of mankind characterised by a combination of certain physical traits which are genetically transmitted.
- A group of tribes or peoples forming an ethnic stock.
- The condition of belonging to a particular people or stock.
Comparing older definitions of the word Race to newer online dictionary definitions reveals something very strange. The word itself has come to be treated with disdain and contempt.
The Wikipedia entry points out that the word has fallen out of use in favour of less emotionally charged words.
The dictionary dot com definition of Race describes Race as “supposedly distinctive physical characteristics” and an “…arbitrary classification of humans”
These disclaimers and riders are a not so subtle attempt to push aside the obvious biological facts. According to this politically distorted view of reality, the obvious differences between the Australian Aboriginal and your blue-eyed Scandinavian are only “supposedly distinctive”.
The modern dictionary definition does not reflect reality, rather it is designed to serve a specific political and ideological agenda.
In this paradigm, the dictionary has ceased to be a reference and lexicon of the English language and has fallen to the exigencies of propaganda. At some point, we have to insist on the truth. There has to be some level of our culture where we can trust that truth has been respected. If not then we unwind and handicap our culture. We have to keep peeling back the layers of corrupted intellectual endeavour in search of a foundation upon which we can once again begin to build up the pillars of our intellectual foundation.
That is what this effort is about. Weeding out from our language words and structures that have been corrupted for political gain. They take our clear and explicit language and make out of it a noose for our own neck.
So I claim right here that Race is good, Race is right, Race exists and to acknowledge that obvious fact should be the most normal and rational observation. To be a Race-ist means simply that you recognise this self-evident fact.
Racism is simply the ideological position that races exist and have a right to pursue their own best interests. The true meaning of Racist should contain no negative connotations at all. The word has been deliberately loaded with emotional blackmail in an attempt to force white people to deny their own Race.
Before one can fight for the continued existence of a racial group you first have to acknowledge that race as a human biological reality exists.
I envisage a time when a Negro, a Chinese, an Arab and a White can all proclaim clearly that they are racists in a spirit of respect and cooperation. Each acknowledging the Racial integrity of the other and being free to pursue the cultural interests of their own people.
White Europeans are encouraged to believe that the very concept of race is false, but only when it is applied to Whites.
Incredibly, even the word that denotes our race has been loaded with negative sentiment that tries to put Europeans on the defensive and apologise for just existing.
One of the fabricated red hearings used to fool weak minded people into going along with the plan of genocide for Europeans is the idea that Race was the root cause of the European wars. And that the only way to maintain world please is to annihilate all the White people! That’s all of them, not just the ethnic Germans as proposed by Theodore Kaufman in his 1941 book “Germany Must Perish”, but all of them, wherever they can be found.
It is true that the history of Europe is a history of Wars just the same as the histories of any other people are sagas of conflict and strife. However these are not Race wars, they are dynastic wars or Religious wars or wars created and fought for the profit of the ruling elite. Particularly the two world wars of the twentieth century were fratricidal wars of unparalleled destruction fought for reasons of geopolitical strategy and profit.
To offer as a solution to the problem of war, the deliberate annihilation of the borders and peoples of Europe is the most horrific and unspeakable proposition in all of human history. These people actually believe that the deliberate extermination of the apex civilisation on the planet is a good way forward to world peace! It is the people who create these wars that need to be dealt with not the people who fought and died in them.
https://youtu.be/RoKl47nK04M David Duke on the decline of the White race.
noun, plural conspiracies.
1. the act of conspiring.
2. an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons; plot.
3. a combination of persons for a secret, unlawful, or evil purpose:
He joined the conspiracy to overthrow the government.
4. Law. an agreement by two or more persons to commit a crime, fraud, or other wrongful act.
The new “establishment” inflexion to the definition is that anyone so tarred with the label of “conspiracy theorist” is also a nutjob loony that no one should take any notice of, unless you too want to be seen as a nutjob looney as well.
This redefinition is clever in that it relies on individual ego for its effectiveness. No one wants to be ostracised or thought of as stupid. The effort here is to portray someone with a theory the government doesn’t like, or an idea that will expose government criminality, as an idiot. If they can discredit the individual rather than deal directly with his allegations they can drive away his support base on the basis of personal ego alone.
The effect is that real conspiracies like Guy Fawkes can no longer be discussed without looking like a complete looney!
This approach should be countered simply by sticking to the truth. The point at issue is the truth of any allegation. Just because one allegation of conspiracy may turn out to be false, does not mean that all conspiracies are therefore false. It’s like assuming that because bananas are shipped in boats, therefore, all boats are banana boats. It shows an incredible degree of intellectual laziness.
Prior to the first world war, the views held today by Racial realists and nationalists would have been considered completely normal and mainstream. Yet now, with the total penetration of left-wing and Marxist ideology through all the institutions of the western world, the Overton Window of acceptable points of view has been moved so far to the left that the once normal and healthy regard for your own people and country is considered the most hateful and evil thing in the world. If you could transport a regular British citizen of that period through a hole in space-time onto one of the liberal university campuses of 2016 he would be shocked and amazed to find himself being “accused” of being a racist. He would be like “what? You mean your not? Why not?” “Race” for him, is taken as a self evident fact. It’s independent of good or bad, and to believe in the concept cannot possibly have any effect on one’s moral standing.
Once again, do not buckle to peer pressure. State boldly and clearly your position and let the light of truth and reason destroy their false ideology.
Everyone thinks hate is such a bad thing. And we are always told to eschew hate at all costs. “Do not allow hate to eat you up”, and “don’t allow hate in your heart”. But there is another side to hate. Hate is a normal and very powerful emotion, it can drive a man to action when fear of physical harm or failure would normally paralyse his mind and his body.
The liberals in their pathological altruism claim they are incapable of hate. If that is true then they only advertise their place in the line of sitting ducks. Waiting for their turn at the hands of the next criminal. Do you not hate the man who comes to rape and kill your wife? What about those that would do harm to your children, are you going to say you don’t hate them? Or the government departments that steal your property and interfere with your family, are you completely indifferent to these people?
Now we have Hate Speach and Hate Crime legislation. These are simply the tools of tyrannical governments to shut down dissent and free speech.
Remember the quote from Orwell and speak. “In a time of universal deceit – telling the truth is a revolutionary act.”
Macatak is member of Order15 In new Zealand if your interested to read more of Macatak thoughts you can check out his blog here hes actively looking for fellow members and supporters to build a reliable O15 network if your from NZ and interested do get in touch with him.