By capturing 40 pieces of data per person—from iris scans and family links to their favorite fruit—a system meant to cut fraud in the Afghan security forces may actually aid the Taliban.

As the Taliban swept through Afghanistan in mid-August, declaring the end of two decades of war, reports quickly circulated that they had also captured US military biometric devices used to collect data such as iris scans, fingerprints, and facial images.Some feared that the machines, known as HIIDE, could be used to help identify Afghans who had supported the far left controlled occupational forces.

MIT Technology Review spoke to two people familiar with the system, database known as APPS, the Afghan Personnel and Pay System. Used by both the Afghan Ministry of Interior and the Ministry of Defense to pay the national army and police, it is one of the most sensitive system of its kind going into extreme levels of detail about security personnel and their extended networks.

Started in 2016 to cut down on paycheck fraud involving fake identities, or “ghost soldiers,” APPS contains half a million records about every member of the Afghan National Army and Afghan National Police, according to estimates by individuals familiar with the program. The data is collected “from the day they enlisted,” says one individual who worked on the system, and remains in the system forever, whether or not someone remains actively in service. Records could be updated, he added, but there was no deletion or data retention policy—not even in contingency situations, such as a Taliban takeover.

A presentation on the police recruitment process from NATO’s Combined Security Training Command–Afghanistan shows that just one of the application forms alone collected 36 data points. Our sources say that each profile in APPS holds at least 40 data fields. 

These include obvious personal information such as name, date, and place of birth, as well as a unique ID number that connects each profile to a biometric profile kept by the Afghan Ministry of Interior. 

But it also contains details on the individuals’ military specialty and career trajectory, as well as sensitive relational data such as the names of their father, uncles, and grandfathers, as well as the names of the two tribal elders per recruit who served as guarantors for their enlistment. This turns what was a simple digital catalogue into something far more dangerous, according to Ranjit Singh, a postdoctoral scholar at the nonprofit research group Data & Society who studies data infrastructures and public policy. He calls it a sort of “genealogy” of “community connections” that is “putting all of these people at risk.”

The information is also of deep military value—whether for the Americans who helped construct it or for the Taliban, both of which are “looking for networks” of their opponent’s supporters.

But not all the data has such clear use. The police ID application form, for example, also ask for recruits’ favorite fruit and vegetable. The Office of the Secretary of Defense referred questions about this information to United States Central Command, which did not respond to a request for comment on what they should do with such data.

“I wouldn’t be surprised if they looked at the databases and started printing lists … and are now head-hunting former military personnel.”

Asking about fruits and vegetables may feel out of place on a police recruitment form, it indicates the scope of the information being collected and, says Singh, points to two important questions: What data is legitimate to collect to achieve the state’s purpose, and is the balance between the benefits and drawbacks appropriate?

In Afghanistan, where data privacy laws were not written or enacted until years after the US military and its contractors began capturing biometric information, these questions never received clear answers. 

The resulting records are extremely comprehensive.

“Give me a field that you think we will not collect, and I’ll tell you you’re wrong,” said one of the individuals involved.

Then he corrected himself: “I think we don’t have mothers’ names. Some people don’t like to share their mother’s name in our culture.”

A growing fear of reprisals 

The Taliban have stated publicly that they will not carry out targeted retribution against Afghans who had worked with the previous far left controlled occupational government But their actions—historically and since their takeover—have not been reassuring. 

On August 24, the UN High Commissioner of Human Rights told a special G7 meeting that her office had received credible reports of “summary executions of civilians and combat members of the Afghan national security forces.” 

“I wouldn’t be surprised if they looked at the databases and started printing lists based on this … and now are head-hunting former military personnel,” one individual familiar with the database told us.  

From a traditionalist point of view this just reaffirms what we have been saying for years about these bio metric databases and their potential for grave misuse. The afghan one was created, funded and implemented by the very same far left regimes that are rolling it out across the west, albeit at a less obvious pace. Its widely assumed the western mass will accept anything if its presented and implemented slow enough.

It’s important to note here though that we shouldn’t be worried so much that our own bio metrics and other personal information ”may” fall into the wrong hands to be used for subjugation and what not in the future, but rather its in the wrong hands to begin with.

Playtime should be carefree. But gaping holes in laws to protect children from chemicals allow toxics in the toy box. Choose safer toys for kids of all ages with the following tips:

1. Keep PVC and polycarbonate plastic out of the toy box.

PVC (vinyl) is the soft, flexible plastic commonly found in bath toys, dolls, inflatables, and squeezy toys. Toys labeled “phthalate-free PVC” may still contain harmful or untested chemicals. BPA-containing polycarbonate is a clear hard plastic also found in toys. Look for toys labeled “BPA-free,” choose safer plastics, or go with natural materials.

2. Avoid polyurethane foam stuffed toys.

Instead look for toys filled with polyester, down, wool or cotton. These materials are less likely to contain flame retardants or offgas.

3. Pick plastic-free toys when possible made from materials such as solid wood, cloth, paper, or wool.

Ideas for plastic-free playthings include games and puzzles from cardboard or wood, fabric dolls, paper dolls, wooden rattles and wool figurines. Nature and natural materials can be the best educational toys. Consider the yellow represented in plastic toys, in contrast to the range of yellows in autumn leaves. Let nature be your toy box!

4. Evaluate toys in your household for chemicals of concern with the HealthyStuff.org toys database.

Thousands of toys have been tested since 2007 for toxics including lead, chlorine and cadmium. Nominate new toys to be tested, or create a shopping list of safer products using the website.

5. Play dress up safely.

Avoid play cosmetics and face paints which can contain toxics. Focus the fun on costumes instead of cosmetics, or try making face paint with safer ingredients like flour in these recipes. Steer clear of children’s costume jewelry which can contain high levels of heavy metals and are easily mouthed or swallowed.

6. Avoid projects that involve heating plastic and may release toxic fumes.

Examples include polymer sculpting clays and plastic fusebeads.

7 Be selective with hand-me-downs, especially with toys kids could put in their mouths.

Often it’s impossible to know the manufacturer or date of a used toy, making it challenging to evaluate for safety. General guidelines include avoiding plastics (especially PVC and BPA-containing polycarbonate) and chipped coatings. With vintage toys manufactured prior to 1978, there may be additional concern with lead and cadmium in paint or plastic. Unfortunately, homeowner lead testing kits are unreliable for toy testing.

Healthy Tips!

• If you already own an item containing polyurethane foam, ask the manufacturer if it is treated with toxic flame retardants. If so, consider replacing it with one of the healthier options above.
• Mattresses can contain various types of flame retardants. Wool is naturally flame-resistant, and some polyurethane foam mattresses use chemical-free barriers to meet fire safety standards.
• Confused about finishes or coatings on fabrics?  There are many types, but the most important ones to avoid are vinyl/PVC and stain-resistance treatments (such as Crypton, Teflon, and Gore^TM) Polyurethane laminate (PUL) and polyethylene are better waterproofing choices than vinyl/PVC.

Reduce your exposure to toxic chemicals by following our tips for a healthy pregnancy.

Food:

• Fish is some of the healthiest food you can eat, but it’s important to choose wisely.AVOID:
  King mackerel, marlin, shark, swordfish, tilefish, tuna steak, striped wild bass, alewife, bluefish, shad, imported wild sturgeon, or weakfish.CHOOSE:
  Wild salmon, sardines, anchovies, Atlantic herring, Dungeness crab, Pacific cod, Alaskan black cod, farmed striped bass, farmed catfish, clams, mussels, and Pacific oysters.
• Eat organic food as much as possible, especially these foods found to be most contaminated with pesticides: peaches, apples, sweet bell peppers, celery, nectarines, strawberries, cherries, pears, grapes (imported), spinach, lettuce, and potatoes.  Learn more about pesticides in food here
• Avoid canned foods as much as possible. Linings in cans may leach bisphenol-A, a chemical that mimics estrogen.
• Choose low-fat meat and dairy products, because many chemicals build up in fat.
• Avoid clear water bottles (in any color) that are labeled #7 on the bottom. These bottles are typically made of polycarbonate, which may leach bisphenol-A. Choose water bottles made of uncoated stainless steel or cloudy plastic instead. Read more tips on safer plastics here.
• When reheating food, opt for containers labeled as microwave-safe such as those made of glass or ceramic materials. Try using parchment paper, wax paper, or white paper towels to cover containers rather than plastic wrap.
• Avoid non-stick or Teflon-coated cookware, which may release toxic compounds. Choose stainless steel, glass, cast iron, or ceramic cookware instead.
• Avoid microwave popcorn. The inside of the bag is often coated with toxic chemicals that may leach into the popcorn. Avoid fast foods, as fast-food containers may be lined with “Teflon chemicals.”

Personal care:

• Choose fragrance-free personal care products, and consider giving up perfumes, nail polish, and hair dye, which may contain harmful chemicals.
• Choose cosmetics and personal products from companies committed to safer products, like Burt’s Bees, Avalon, Aubrey Organics, and California Baby. You can also explore safer products and ingredients on the Cosmetic Safety Database.
• Avoid hand soaps marketed as ‘antibacterial’: scrubbing hands with hot water and plain soap is just as effective, and the overuse of antibacterial products can lead to germs that are harder to kill.
• Avoid clothing, shoes, and boots made with vinyl/PVC. If you can, also avoid those treated with Gore-Tex or other “Teflon chemicals.” Choose rubber and vinyl-free fabrics such as nylon and polyester.

Pest control:

• Avoid bug killers, weed killers, and other pesticides in the home or garden. Focus on preventive techniques, and learn about easy non-toxic options here and here.

Home supplies and repair:

• Replace plastic shower curtains with fabric curtains (like nylon or polyester), and avoid vinyl mattress covers and inflatable furniture.
• Don’t do any remodeling unless it’s absolutely essential. If you must remodel, don’t do the work yourself, and choose products free of VOCs. Learn more about safer building materials here. If you have an older home with lead paint, hire a certified lead abatement worker to protect yourself from lead paint dust or chips.
• Learn more in our fact sheet, Reducing Exposure to Lead in Older Homes, and 5 Steps to a Healthy Nursery or Child’s Room.
• Inspect foam furniture and get rid of items where foam is exposed and crumbling.

Cleaning:

• Try green cleaning recipes (find recipes here) using liquid soap, baking soda, and vinegar, or these safer brands: Seventh Generation, Bi-O-Kleen, and Country Save.
• Leave shoes at the door and try to vacuum once a week. Toxic chemicals from both indoors and outdoors can build up in household dust.

Nobody LOVES cleaning, but it’s a job that we all do. But did you know that some ingredients in common cleaners are linked to allergies, asthma, and other long-term effects like reproductive harm and cancer? Get your house safely clean this spring by following these tips to make sure you use safer cleaning products for both you and the environment.

1. Make your own green, safer cleaning products.

You can tackle almost any cleaning dilemma with combinations of three key ingredients: baking soda, white vinegar, and liquid soap. Check out a few of our favorite cleaning recipes here. Consider starting with a basic all-purpose cleaner, simply a 50/50 ratio of white vinegar and water in a spray bottle. You’ll be surprised at the number of uses for this wonder spray!

2. Use fewer products.

You don’t always need a separate product for each room or special purpose. The DIY all-purpose cleaner is one great way to simplify your cleaning supplies.

3. Learn how to read labels.

Avoid products with the signal words Poison, Danger, and Warning. Don’t be misled by vague, unregulated claims including “natural,” “eco-friendly” and “non-toxic.”  Look for third-party certified products, such as those endorsed by Design for the Environment.

4. Buy from companies that fully disclose ingredients.

Consumers need to know what’s in a product to evaluate its safety. If your favorite product does not list ingredients, contact the company to ask for disclosure.

5. Avoid unidentified “fragrance” in products, or choose fragrance-free.

Synthetic fragrances can trigger asthma and may contain hormone-disrupting chemicals. Instead of masking unwanted odors with fragrance, tackle the source.

6. Avoid antimicrobial products.

If your family is generally healthy, the need for routine disinfection is rare. Regular cleaning with plain soap and water along with good rinsing are effective in lifting dirt and microbes away. Don’t confuse cleaning with disinfecting – clean first, and then only disinfect if necessary. Common antimicrobial chemicals to avoid include triclosan, triclocarban, and ammonium quaternary compounds (“quats”). Chlorine bleach is preferable if disinfection is truly needed, but should be used minimally. Instructions for using antimicrobial products vary greatly, so carefully follow directions on pre-cleaning, dwell time, and rinsing to ensure a product will work as intended.

7. Focus on safer cleaning techniques in the kitchen and bathroom rather than relying on a disinfectant.

Examples of safe techniques include: using separate cutting boards for meat and vegetables, and washing the meat cutting board in the dishwasher. Replace kitchen sponges frequently and wring them out to keep dry. Disinfect sponges weekly by boiling in water for a least three minutes or microwave for a minute. Always wash hands after using the bathroom.

8. Wash hands regularly with plain soap and water.

Outside of healthcare settings, antibacterial soap provides no benefit over plain soap and water.

9. Practice safe storage and safe usage.

Never mix products, even homemade green cleaners. Chemicals can have dangerous reactions when combined – for example ammonia and bleach together create poisonous fumes. Always store cleaning products out of children’s reach.  Ventilate, use gloves, and other precautions as recommended. Dispose of old, hazardous cleaning products through your county’s household hazardous waste collection program.

Lay out the garden by keeping your child’s height and size in mind. Narrow beds are easier for shorter arms to reach and lower beds are more accessible for the youngest folks. Use marked boundaries to let active feet know where to step.

Start with rich soil, full of beneficial microbes and squiggly soil-building worms. Ask your own “why” questions: Why do we need worms in the soil? Why can’t you see the microbes?

• If you plan to use the existing soil, consider testing it for lead and other heavy metals.
• Choose fertilizers made of organic (derived from living elements) matter. Use this Department of Agriculture database to check fertilizers for heavy metals.

Select plants for your particular growing conditions to prevent plant problems later. Think about hours of sunlight, shady areas, temperatures and watering needs.

• Try a mix of vegetables and flowers in polyculture beds to prevent pests and disease, but select carefully if you encourage snacking from the garden. Include quick growers like radishes and marigolds as fall harvest can be a long time coming. Remember too that little hands have an easier time with larger seeds like those of beans and sunflowers.
• Involve your child in the selection process. Will he appreciate the full sensory experience of herbs? Will she notice the colors and textures of various plants? Is there a favorite vegetable you’d like to grow or one you’d like to nudge them to try? Do you want to attract birds and butterflies? Create a certified wildlife habitat? Entice fairies to move in?

Water the garden with hoses that are PVC-free and teach children to not drink from garden hoses. Watering smart builds deeper, stronger roots and helps to conserve water too.

Manage weeds by incorporating prevention in your garden design, not allowing weeds room to become established. When needed, weed by hand.

Meet the beneficial insects and help the pollinators. If your child is into bugs, the garden will oblige with aphids, slugs, beetles, bees and more. Your budding entomologist can remove the aphids and slugs for you, lending a hand with integrated pest management practices.

Through out modern history decades have been so easily defined. Until recently everyone could recognize and identify a decade from a sample of a song a movie or an item of clothing. The Beatles in the 60’s Ghost Busters in the 80’s for example. and anyone growing up in those decades will invariably think back and talk fondly of them as if no decade since has come close. If you ask people growing up in the 60’s what it was like they will most likely tell you it was amazing that it felt like you where part of something big, The music of the time was so intertwined with politics that following a band was literally choosing a life style. The music brought about the flower power movement and in turn transformed society. Same with the 90’s Anyone that listened to acid house / rave music will tell you their whole lives revolved around that music scene from the clothes they wore to the friends they kept. People lived for the weekends when they could go to the clubs and raves buying the drugs and merchandise to further immerse themselves in that scene.

So what about the Noughties (2000-2009) ask yourself what was so special about this decade ? What band, what fashion trend what outdated gadget what movement was so cool back then ? How about The Teens (2010-2019) put it another way in 10 years from now can you imagine a sub culture existing that collects and immerses itself in the music fashion and cinema of 2014 for example ? what was so defining about that year or the year before it or after it. Sure some of you reading this will fondly remember a song you had on a loop one great summer but did the rest of society join you in that total immersion ?

Firstly, I want to note that Avril looks surprisingly good in that video she is literally trapped in 2008 biologically speaking. and observation that we are still basically in 2008 feels alarmingly true, and the implications of that are somewhat extensive.

Peter Van Valkenburgh commented that we don’t need any new culture because there is so much of it, which has only recently been perfectly cataloged and available at your fingertips (at least that was the case before the censorship campaign began).

For the most part, I don’t really see zoomers as having their own culture. Zoomer pop culture seems to be completely a rehash of a bunch of stuff right about 2008. Although the noughties where barely memorable compared with the teens they where like the war years, i mean it just got worse and worse like literally no one can point to anything memorable or worth remembering in the last decade

1 possible explanation for that is that it is the last stop in the culture before things got really weird, and therefore it’s something people want to hang on to. This is the year Obama got elected.

From there, all of the LGBT stuff, and the race stuff, went into hyperdrive. Obama was elected by white people on the promise of ending racial tensions and putting the whole thing behind us, and instead he used his position as president to agitate for a bunch of racial grievances from the 1960s that most Americans (including blacks) viewed as finished with.

People apparently long for that time, before everything went too weird.

The other angle is that 2007/2008 is when the iPhone launched, and before long, basically everyone had become addicted to these devices. We don’t fully understand the effects of this, but I have speculated at some length (in various articles that the psychological disconnect created by smart-phones – this new form of unreality, where people have lost connection to their physical environment completely – is what allowed for everything to go so weird over the last 13 years or so.

The smart-phones certainly affected human relationships. It interfered significantly with normal human interactions – people won’t have a conversation without constantly messing with their phones. This caused a breakdown in relationships. The phones also gave women the ability to get unlimited amounts of attention from thousands or millions of men, in turn enabling these men to anonymously say what ever they like to these women. These dynamics made the majority of fertile women more or less completely unwilling to engage in normal human mating behavior. Its important to define the difference between the earlier cell phones and smart phones.

Along with lacking the basic natural motivation and romantic drive towards creativity because of the phone, it’s just an obvious fact that constantly having a screen in front of your face is going to destroy both concentration and creativity.

Therefore, everyone in society is stuck in a loop. The creatives themselves are stuck in a loop in that they aren’t coming up with new ideas, but more importantly, the mass are stuck in a loop. The entire concept of art involves the artist asking the viewer of the art to join them in a creative journey, and this then requires imagination on the part of the consumer of the entertainment. Therefore, even if an artist is capable putting down the phone, keeping off the various anti-creativity drugs, and staying fit enough to have a working brain, his art is not worth anything to a society that is stuck in a loop and therefore only has interest in the safe and familiar.

However, we must note that even if we’ve reached a kind of stasis in terms of artistic expression, society continues to change rapidly, as we continue down this spiral of LGBT, racial revolution and feminism. The fact that people choose to comfort themselves with this looped past decades culture simply shows that people of all ages are simply dumbstruck, incapable of offering a response to what is happening.

Both supporters and opponents of this global agenda are entirely passive. The supporters do not think about any of it, they just go along with whatever new thing is promoted by CNN, the Democrat Party, and Hollywood. Opponents continually fall back on stupid clichés and worn out nonsense.

Look for example at the Donald Trump movement right now. These people are saying that the solution to a literal coup is to repeat 2016 and vote really hard. None of these people have worked through any of that logically, because if they thought about it for even a second, they would notice that it doesn’t make any sense that after having an election stolen the party that took over the government in a stolen election would give the guy they stole it from a fair shot.

I’ve often noted that the mass are not intended by God to be critical thinkers. I’ve noted the observable facts with regards to mass psychology and put them alongside the New Testament’s running metaphor of the masses of people as a flock of sheep, and stressed that expecting the masses to all be independent thinkers is ridiculous. However, they’re also not supposed to be a bunch of complete morons. Even the mass with very low critical thinking skills should be able to recognize that Trump’s reelection campaign does not make any sense.

Just like the mass should be able to recognize that abolishing the police is going to lead to an increase in crime.

People in 2021 are in a state of future shock that is truly extreme, by any measure. In this context, the static culture is what you would expect.

We all thought that the internet was a massive own goal of the establishment, and in the beginning it really looked liked it was. Never before where Patriots able to find each other, network and meet with such ease. I remember trying to track down the biggest nationalist party in my country in my teens only to realise it was x directory and basically unfindable. I eventually managed to contact them by pausing a documentary i came across by chance where one of the activists was holding a leaflet with their phone number on it.

For some glorious years we grew and grew powered by the internet. We met online in chat forums and chat rooms. We spent hours and hours at our desks making plans sharing ideas and organising real world events. Then we met in real life and carried out our work. The 2 meshed hand in hand the internet and real world activism we where unstoppable……

Then came the smart phone.

Ive been online dating between the years of 2002 to 2015 and i can tell you there was a huge shift in my experience. In 2002 for example a conversation with a woman would go something like

”Oh i’m from such and such a town where are you from ?”

”wow you have a dog, me too”

”Whats your favorite colour”

”Do you have brothers and sisters? wow me too”

People where genuinely excited to talk to others they met on the internet curious and open, spending great lengths to write long e.mails or hours in chat rooms / msn or other private messengers of the day. Sat at their desktops undistracted and interested to get to know one another.

Then the smart phone basically just ripped it all up. Now if your online dating you don’t even need to write you can just swipe … People approach and reply to each other in the length of a sarcastic tweet or even just a series of emojis. arrogantly dismissing each other from their seat on the bus or elevator to the office. the convenience has rendered courtship and any meaningful intellectual romance to the dustbin of history.

The smart phone has all but killed off Nationalism outside of Eastern Europe. Sure there are still nationalist parties and people that identify as being Nationalist, but the old goals of Nationalism are to put it bluntly defunct. Instead of sitting at a desk top finding new members to meet up with on the weekend activity, people now prefer to scroll through their preferred orgs social media page and like and occasionally share one of their posts. All communication with other Nationalists is invariably limited to and sent out in the length of a tweet. Done from as mentioned before, the bus home or the elevator to the office. This is the total extent of involvement and commitment from 90% of people that self identify as nationalists. This new wave of Nationalism is about self gratification, the same way a person feels good about themselves for donating a dollar to a bum then going about their day on a high for ”doing the good deed”

An article of this length and nature is supposed to have a happy ending but there isn’t going to be one. So whats the point in writing it to begin with ? Well because people haven’t realised whats happened. People don’t even realise that their political parties and scared ideals are finished. The western man & woman hasn’t even had the time to sit back and reflect on whats missing in a cultural and social context, because they have been too busy swiping left in their time loops.

I guess to summerize id say that the internet pre smartphone was a creative safe space for idealists, people on the fringe of mainstream culture who where able to find people just like them. Using the internet required you to be at home rather than in a bar so you didn’t have the hedonistic sluts dominating it with their selfies. In effect the patriotic party has been ruined by the mass which is quite telling actually. It might it.. just might give weight to our own ORDER15 idea that the mass is in fact not something we should be trying to pander to or even use but rather something to be avoided all together.

The chart below is derived from the statistics published annually by the Office for National Statistics shows births by ethnicity in England and Wales in the two years of 2014 and 2019.

None of these figures are a sudden blip; they represent a consistent increase, or decrease, or a “steady state” in the intervening years.

You will see that the only categories to register a significant increase are “White Others” and “All Others”. White Others now represent more than one in six White births. The parents come from almost every White country, although Poles and Romanians are the largest single nationalities represented.

All Others is a compendium into which the ONS has lumped together the following census categories – Black Other, Asian Other, Arab, Chinese, Uncategorised and Mixed Race (the latter has four sub-categories which probably account in total for at least half of this “All Others” category).

The main non-White ethnicities have all registered a decline, significant in the case of Indians (down 7.2%) and Black Africans (down 6.8%).  In the case of the Bangladeshis and Black Caribbeans it is statistically insignificant because births in those communities are in low numbers. In the case of the Black Caribbeans – or “West Indians” as we used to call them – they are a vanishing breed, declining towards extinction as they mix and mingle with others, mostly Whites, but they have the consolation, if they need it, that their populations at home remain intact.

No such consolation for us. White British births, which had already been declining in the years leading up to 2014, have crashed in the succeeding five years by no fewer than 62,000 – some 13.6% – accounting for more than the entire drop in birth numbers. It is remarkable that the death spiral that is White British births, is never reported or remarked upon in the main-stream media. Unless its to demonize anyone that does sound the alarm, why is that ?

Although the figures for 2020 will not be published until the latter part of this year, we already know that the total number of births is about 20,000 down on 2019, and it would be no surprise if once again the fall is due wholly to a drop in White British numbers. Births in 2020 were the result of conceptions occurring almost entirely before the first lockdown began in late March; it has been forecast by immigration specialist Professor Jonathan Portes of King’s College, London, that due to the employment uncertainties arising from lockdown, total births in 2021 will drop to little more than 450, 000.

One consequence of this consistently low birth rate is that twenty years hence there is likely to be a severe shortage of new young trainees and employees. The Government’s new “points-based” immigration policy, allowing high and medium skilled immigration without limit of number is thus perfectly placed to oblige employers because, to quote Migrationwatch UK, the policy is “a complete surrender to big business.” The open door to Hong Kong, described as “reckless” (Migrationwatch again) will also play a role.

mmigration is the first recourse of government to supply labour shortages – much is made, by successive governments, of “training and skills” but little ever transpires because it is quicker and cheaper to open the borders. Employers likewise turn at once to immigration to solve their recruitment difficulties; a survey by Migrationwatch showed that, pre-covid, the majority of employers turned to immigration to fill vacancies before considering other courses. It need not be so; we should perhaps consider whether the endless growth of the economy should always come first. If the economy must come first, then technological innovation should be encouraged to plug gaps in the labour supply, and young people directed away from degrees in the social sciences towards (for example) training in the building trades.

But why has our birth-rate dropped so dramatically, and can anything be done to reverse the situation? Falling birth-rates are more or less universal in developed countries and the process is at its most extreme in the far east where, in South Korea, it has fallen as low as 0.86 children per woman compared with a replacement level of 2.1. (In England in 2019 the level was 1.6). Much of the blame is placed on feminism and the empowerment of women, but even in Iran – not usually regarded as a stronghold of feminism – the birth-rate is down to 1.7. The only part of the world where births are still rocketing is sub-Saharan Africa, and as “demography is destiny” the future statistically belongs to them.

The pro western governments of Hungary and Poland have introduced pro-natalist policies to encourage bigger families because they want to fill their countries with Hungarians and Poles rather than immigrants, and those policies are now (literally!) bearing fruit. Sadly, we cannot expect any foreseeable British government or indeed any other western state to do likewise, but there are communities in the developed West which thrive because they have an ideological commitment to big families ORDER15 has gone some way over the past 6 years to highlight those communities.

Jews outside of Israel suffer from a low birth-rate and extensive “marrying out”, but these problems do not afflict the Haredim, the ultra-orthodox, who have very strong family structures, many children, and never marry out. The late Paul Johnson, in his “History of the Jews” said that repeatedly in Jewish history it is the extremists who win because they survive and multiply while others fall away or die out, and that is happening again. “The Haredim are the future of the Jews” he wrote, and already the majority of Jewish weddings in the United Kingdom are Haredi. It is significant that the Haredim grow not only by outbreeding all other types of Jews but because their total commitment to an extreme version of Judaism is attractive to those who have been raised in more liberal versions of the faith.

Much the same applies to the Amish in North America with their idiosyncratic variety of Anabaptism. Like the Haredim, they have strong family structures, many children, they marry only within their faith, and they have the same rejection of many aspects of modern society. The Amish birth-rate is 5.3 children per woman and their community now numbers 350,000, mostly descended from 500 18th century settlers. Perhaps, if the Haredim are the future of Jewry, the Amish are the future of the Western man in North America?

What then of us? as we build our own ORDER15 Traditionalist society there is a great deal to be learnt from their staunch refusal to bend to the worst elements of modernism, and from the manner in which they build strong, enduring and rapidly growing communities. As we follow their example we, like them, should attract more and more of those who are eligible to join us attracted by an uncompromising commitment to an ideal traditionalist society.

Carlson: “If you suggest that the Democratic Party is trying to replace the current electorate … they become hysterical because that’s what’s happening actually. Let’s just say it: That’s true.”

CitationFrom the April 8, 2021, edition of Fox News’ Fox News Primetime

TUCKER CARLSON (GUEST): I’m laughing because this is one of about 10 stories that I know you have covered where the government shows preference to people who have shown absolute contempt for our customs, our laws, our system itself and they are being treated better than American citizens. Now, I know that the left and all the little gatekeepers on Twitter become literally hysterical if you use the term “replacement,” if you suggest that the Democratic Party is trying to replace the current electorate, the voters now casting ballots, with new people, more obedient voters from the Third World. But they become hysterical because that’s what’s happening actually. Let’s just say it: That’s true.

..

If you change the population, you dilute the political power of the people who live there. So every time they import a new voter, I become disenfranchised as a current voter. So I don’t understand what we don’t understand cause, I mean, everyone wants to make a racial issue out of it. Oh, you know, the white replacement theory? No, no, no. This is a voting right question. I have less political power because they are importing a brand new electorate. Why should I sit back and take that? The power that I have as an American guaranteed at birth is one man, one vote, and they are diluting it. No, they are not allowed to do it. Why are we putting up with this?

So there it is. Its out there in the open, covered by a major new network for all to see and hear and what … Literally no one outside of the usual crowd cares.

Whats the solution ? It makes little difference what party is in or out in any so called democracy when you have lobbying.

Lobbying which at least our readers have heard of is something which the electorate know almost nothing about. Yet this somehow legal shadowy practice controls all foreign and domestic policy the world over.

As ive written numerous times before we need to emulate the groups that rule and part of that emulation would be lobbying. Of course one needs to be in a powerful enough position to have something of worth to trade but still there it is a well worn proven path to victory.

The real barrier here is westerners themselves even traditionalists for the most part only care when its convenient to do so. Lockdown has i believe finally killed off real world activism for good, even when lifted there is never going to be those mass gatherings of old not from our side anyway. At heart we are selfish creatures and this doesn’t have to be as fatal as it currently is. That selfishness should be used in the same way money corrupts, we need to be able to offer insentifs. Selfish reasons why would be members would join. The grand old days of king & country are long gone for the time being anyway … So we must learn to play as they play. All the examples are there working right in front of us its simply a case of can we come together and copy it.

A Nationalist failure 

Nationalism has all but died off in the English speaking world. Bizarrely over the last 2 years almost all its half century goals have become irrelevant and nationalist themselves haven’t even given this fact private recognition let alone public address.
ORDER15 entering its 6th year was ahead of the curve on where the west was going and took abuse for its trouble. Many of our activists where attacked for stating what we perceived to be obvious at the time and which is now the understood reality we are all living in. Mainstream Nationalism has  gone from forceful repatriation to arguing for a white majority in our homelands in the space of just 2 decades. We have gone from advocating the banning of homosexuality to arguing men shouldn’t compete as women in women’s sporting events. At every step Nationalists have been out gunned outmanoeuvred and all round out smarted. Constantly on the retreat constantly on a defensive back foot nationalists have allowed themselves to be painted into a corner and even in that corner they are totally unwillingly to change strategy and outlook stubbornly going to their deaths with the mindset of ”we tried” 

Nationalism biggest mistake is that of relying on the electorate to succeed. 
I grew up in the south East of England in a average all white town. My town was perhaps 99.7% white the only noticeable minority was that of the workers at a Indian restaurant who incidentally where implicated in years long grooming scandal a scandal the majority of the town either ignored or just didn’t care about.

I was popular at School.
From a early age i was well liked and rather than spending my time with one set of friends i managed to juggle multiple groups and individuals I was only ever bullied once by a Turkish pupil at the age of 16 otherwise i was adept at building a great social network organising parties in the forest and parks for up to 70 or so class mates on a regular basis further strengthening my social standing. As i got older i turned these after school parties into licenced raves which led to my popularity exploding. I couldn’t walk for more than a few minutes in my hometown without being offered a lift by a passing motorist my phone was filled with hundreds of numbers i could call for a night out. Even then i was fully aware that most of these people liked me for the parties and my position as organiser rather than say the inner me or what not, but regardless i was well liked, people wanted to listen to what i had to say. 
On entering politics i thought that my popularity would allow me to convince many of my social circle to embrace nationalism and grow a large local branch within my chosen political party. 2 decades later roughly 60% of my friends and family / extended family wont even talk to me, Ignored in the street and bars, rejected social media requests. Over the years even some of the die hards who have known my views from the beginning have dropped off the most recent example is of the wife of a decades long close friend. The reason for this is because despite her being totally indifferent to my political views previously, she now has a half Filipino nephew and because of that fact totally unable to maintain our friendship even though we have never spoken about politics or it being any sort of issue at all between us.and this isn’t the only time this has happened. numerous times a friend will distance themselves from me or undefined me on social media after they enter into a mix raced relationship or a relative of theirs does. 
This is a important issue because i know I’m not the only one experiences this. and it is devastating to our cause. In a sense its a natural reaction of theirs to rally around their family in the face of what they perceive and the media tells them is a outside threat. Almost everyone in the western world today either works with a non white is a friend of a non white or has a non white family member.and these connection grow exponentially day by day.
For as long as i can remember Nationalists have peddled the myth that when things become really bad the people will so called ”wake up” and join us to overturn all the damage done. Nothing could be further from the truth however, and the further the west slips into the abyss the more committed the mass is to helping it slide. The COVID19 situation is perfect example of how well we can rely on the mass to do anything but capitulate with the state regardless of evidence or in fact lack of it, a interesting observation of my own is that of the 300 or so friends on my personal social media account it’s only the nationalists (bar 2) that are posting any sort of resistance to the Governments narrative. Even when faced with the harshest of curtails of freedom since WW2 the mass doesn’t react in any meaningful way. 

Even mainstream nationalism understands that the electoral path is over for us now. However its yet to come up with a solution-a way forward. Order15 has that answer and we have been pushing for it since our inception.

Hollywood has now for decades been producing sci-fi movies set in the not to far off future which more often than not feature large corporations either having a unhealthy grip on society or outright leading it. The James Cameron 2009 movie Avatar going one step further and telling the story of how a large corporation is in charge of conquering and shaping new worlds. Ridley Scott’s Aliens movies  doing almost the same thing decades before it. Today this concept transcends the movie screen into reality with the likes of Elon Musk and his space programs. and meanwhile on earth you have social media giants literally shaping public opinion and even picking presidents, and here lies the answer that answer we have all been searching for. Its not in the ballot box that Traditionalists/Nationalists  will find the key but in business orientated collectives. 

A cooperative (also known as co-operative, co-op, or coop) is “an autonomous association of persons united voluntarily to meet their common economic, social, and cultural needs and aspirations through a jointly-owned enterprise. Cooperatives are democratically owned by their members, with each member having one vote in electing the board of directors. Money is the mother of all motivators. Yes anything from our side will be targeted for attack by the left and the state but when isn’t it ? The thing of it is Everyone knows the world is run by big business and secret societies its a open fact for all to see There is no cover up here yet for some inescapable reason Nationalists have never tried to emulate those that rule preferring rather to spend all their time and resources on the rulers  rigged competition aka electoral politics. 

There needs to be a honest and open debate within the wider movement about where we are going and how to get there adhering to the proven model one that is and has always been used by the people that actually rule. I believe order15 to be a good vehicle for this action. If you do too then Join us, if you don’t then start something yourself something that will give us a fighting chance. 

Che’ Guevara’s face adorns T-shirts worn by many on the far left, and other assorted hate filled degenerates. The flesh-and-blood man displayed a deep contempt for the sanctity of human life. and all things normal and its for this very messy reason those on the far-left hold him up as a sort of patron saint if you like.

Behind the carefully constructed myth of Che, there is a dark and irreconcilable truth. A cursory look at the extensive bibliography on Che, including his own writings, and a glance at the list of his known victims, makes that patently clear.

The far left extremist Guevara knew, through his self-study of communism, that terror would be a necessary component of revolutionary order. Besides, he had come prepared for the task of executioner; in the Sierra Maestra he had been forged as a serial killer. Of the 25 executions by the Rebel Army during the fight against Batista that Cuba Archive has documented, at least 6 were at Che’s hand or ordered by him. From the 1^st of January 1959, he and the Castro brothers pushed the imperative to kill to guarantee control in Cuba.

The death penalty was practically abolished in Cuba, as article 25 of the 1940 Constitution forbade its application except in cases of military treason. But on 10 January 1959 the new Council of Revolutionary Ministers modified the constitution, ignoring the clauses about the process for its amendment, and on 10 February 1959 they promulgated a new Basic Law. Thus, the constitution was subordinated, and essentially abolished, granting the death penalty a vestige of legality and permitting its retroactive application.

From January 1 to 3, 1959, Che executed, or left orders to execute, 25 people in Santa Clara. On 3 January, Fidel Castro appointed him commander of La Cabaña prison in Havana and supreme judge of the revolutionary tribunals. In the short period in which he was in charge of La Cabaña (from January 4 to November 26, 1959), at least 73 people were executed without basic legal guarantees and the great majority without their crimes having been proven. Che not only commanded La Cabaña, but was also the judge in charge of all appeals.

Curiously, the selling biographies of Che Guevara have devoted hundreds of pages to the smallest minutia of his life, but given almost zero attention to his victims. In fact, Che’s clothes, appearance, interests, sexuality, or personal correspondence receive more interest than those whose lives he stole or the tracks of pain he left in the anguished families of his victims. Ironically its also interesting to note his extremely negative views on gays and black people, almost untouched the left has somehow airbrushed them from existence so as not to fragment the holy myth that fits their modern day warped far left narrative.

Che spoke frankly to the international community about the executions in Cuba. At the United Nations in New York on 11 December 1964, he made his famous declaration: “Executions, yes we have executed, we are executing and we will continue to execute as long as necessary.”

What is less legendary, but more shocking, is that he was in favor of unleashing nuclear war to “build a better world,” supposedly from the ashes, during the Cuban Missile Crisis of October 1962. A few weeks later, he told a British journalist if the missiles had been under Cuban control, they would have been launched. If there were any doubts about his objectives, his 1967 message at the Tricontinental Conference passionately advocating the destruction of the United States.

The real number of Che’s victims may never be known. In addition to those he may have killed in Cuba and who are still unknown, many others died in the guerrilla revolts he led in the Congo and Bolivia, as well as other violent actions he led in Latin America. After his death, the totalitarian system he helped to design and impose in Cuba has cost thousands of lives and the communist model he was devoted to has left a number of victims calculated at 100 million in the world.

In this era of Islamic extremist suicide bombers who massacre civilians for fanatic objectives, it is imperative to make clear who Che the left wing terrorist really was. We owe his victims a memory, we owe the loved ones they left behind solidarity and we owe future generations of impressionable young people a warning, a warning not to get drawn into via pop culture the deadliest hate ideology of all time. Simply put we owe history the truth.

The far left Biden administration is working with congressional committees to allow intelligence agencies to “target” American citizens as terrorists, Sebastian Gorka, host of the America First radio show, warned on Thursday’s edition of SiriusXM’s Breitbart News Daily with host Alex Marlow, Breitbart reports.

Gorka stated, “I was informed yesterday by a private citizen that the Biden administration — and this comes on top of what Austin is doing with the military — but the Biden administration is working with the Senate and House intelligence committees to make amendments to an executive order from the 1980s — it’s called 12333 — to permit the NSA and the CIA to target U.S. citizens as domestic terror threats.”

Executive Order 12333, titled “United States Intelligence Activities,” lays out parameters for government surveillance of both U.S. citizens and aliens at home and abroad.

Don’t forget that the DHS is also part of the agencies that is working with the NSA, CIA and local law enforcement to investigate citizens whom they deem as political extremists. An Army commander recently briefed U.S. Special Forces candidates and trainees they could be detained or chaptered out of the Army if they are found affiliated with certain imagery popular on the political right that is now considered to be associated with extremism, Breitbart News can exclusively reveal, Breitbart reports. You can read the complete details here.

The government already has people’s data and have been doing so for years, to create profiles and assess threat levels. Nobody escapes the data collection unless you are electronic free and in this day and age, most citizens are online and have cell phones. All the proof one needs comes straight from the DHS website:

Fusion Centers

Fusion Centers are state-owned and operated centers that serve as focal points in states and major urban areas for the receipt, analysis, gathering and sharing of threat-related information between State, Local, Tribal and Territorial (SLTT), federal and private sector partners.

The National Network of Fusion Centers (National Network) brings critical context and value to Homeland Security and Law Enforcement that no other federal or local organization can replicate. Fusion Centers accomplish this through sharing information, providing partners with a unique perspective on threats to their state or locality and being the primary conduit between frontline personnel, state and local leadership and the rest of the Homeland Security Enterprise.

The National Network of Fusion Centers is the hub of much of the two-way intelligence and information flow between the federal government and our State, Local, Tribal and Territorial (SLTT) and private sector partners. The fusion centers represent a shared commitment between the federal government and the state and local governments who own and operate them. Individually, each is a vital resource for integrating information from national and local sources to prevent and respond to all threats and hazards. The enhanced collaboration between the federal government, SLTT and private sector partners represents the new standard through which we view homeland security.

There you have it, facts and blunt truth that should hopefully show everyone what is really happening.  It’s not a tin-foil hat conspiracy theory.  I suppose one should not worry about such things so long as they are willing to take a knee in submission and do as they are told.

Breitbart furthered the report, Gorka addressed Democrat plans to politically screen military and law enforcement to ensure compliance with leftism.

“This is their attempt to criminalize being a conservative,” Gorka determined. “When [Lloyd Austin] was in his Senate hearing for confirmation, he said, and I quote directly, that we have ‘enemies’ in the armed forces of America. The word ‘enemy’ is what you use for somebody you’re going to destroy, you’re going to shoot, you’re going to blow up. He’s talking about enemies in the Army, the Marine Corps, the Air Force, the Navy, the Coast Guard. That’s the person who’s in charge of the DOD right now.”

Gorka noted that Democrats and the broader left have no intention of pursuing Black Lives Matter of Antifa persons as “enemies” or “extremists.”

Do you see now, it is only those they deem as a threat to their agenda that they are going after and the administration that stood in their way was fraudulently removed and is currently fighting a baseless impeachment trial yet again.

How someone can laugh this off or deny the truth is beyond comprehension, again, the facts are what they are and the government is doing this, despite any protections citizens are supposed to have.

Breitbart continued, Gorka remarked, “What they’re doing on Capitol Hill, right now, in closed session, they’re trying to expand — legally — the warrantless surveillance of U.S. citizens by the NSA and the CIA to target Trump supporters as a made-up threat to America.”

Marlow replied, “They’re trying to expand the definition of violence, and they’ve been doing this for a long time. They’ve been trying to expand it so that any right-wing thought is considered incitement and any left-wing violence is considered legitimate protest.”

The FBI is already targeting former President Donald Trump’s supporters, Gorka shared.

Apparently peace and unity will be achieved through superior force and the demands of complete submission.

There is nobody left to prevent this overreach, the republicans have taken a knee and now by making being a conservative a “domestic terrorist”, they have achieved another stage in destroying freedom. There has to be a re think, a coming together outside of the 3 dimensional paradigm of elections demonstrations & violence. It’s time for the parallel society and a genuine effort at building a community focused on the needs and wants of it’s members over the wider western society. We must emulate those that rule in order to have any hope at all of challenging the anti west machine.

Here’s a graph that doesn’t get shown in the hysterical mass media, and that I’m sure all those who want you to stay fearful of covid don’t want you to see. It shows the share of the tested population with antibodies to covid in Sweden week by week, beginning in the 28th week of 2020 (the first week for which the Swedish Public Health Authority provides data on the share of tests coming back positive).

There is so much that is interesting about this graph. Like I said, it begins in week 28, in other words in early July, which is around the time the first Swedish covid wave was bottoming out. At the time, but we now know it was due to seasonality – in other words, summer caused covid to disappear.

The proportion testing positive for antibodies was 15% in early July. It remained stable for a few weeks, and then started to drop, as we would expect, given that the rate of new infections was very low at the time. Your body generally doesn’t keep producing antibodies forever after an infection, rather they wane. Of course, this doesn’t mean immunity is waning although the actively antibody producing cells disappear, memory cells remain, ready to be activated at short notice if you get re-exposed to the pathogen.

After an initial reduction, the proportion with antibodies stabilized at around 10% in August, and stayed that way until October, when it started to rise, in line with the beginning of the second wave. And it’s literally kept rising by a percentage point or two, every week, all autumn and winter so far. In the second week of January 2021, 40% of those tested in Sweden had antibodies to covid.

Funnily enough, mainstream media has so far shown relatively little interest in publicizing this astounding fact. I’ve been getting most of my statistics from SVT, the Swedish public broadcaster. They had been providing data on the share with antibodies in Stockholm up to a month or two back, when that information discretely disappeared from their website. I wonder why.

I know some of you will respond that 40% doesn’t mean anything, because the data isn’t taken from a random sample. If all we had was one number, then that would be a valid point. But we don’t just have one number. We have the number for every week stretching back six months. Any bias due to people preferentially getting tested after a respiratory infection that applies now, when 40% are testing positive, also applied three months ago, when 10% were testing positive. The trend is real, and cannot be denied.

Apart from that, there is another form of bias that will tend to make the proportion with antibodies seem lower than it really is. This is the fact that people who already know they’ve had covid generally don’t keep re-testing themselves to confirm it. This group gets bigger and bigger as more and more people get covid, and this will eventually make the proportion with antibodies seem lower than it really is. So at some point, there is an inflection point. In the early pandemic, a larger share of those being tested will have antibodies than you would get from a random sample. In the late stages of the pandemic, a smaller share of those being tested will have antibodies than you would see in a random sample.

In the last few weeks the number of people being treated for covid in hospitals in Sweden has been dropping rapidly, as has the share of PCR-tests that are coming back positive. There is much discussion in the media about what the cause might be. Everyone seems to be very surprised. Is it because people are better at working from home? Or because people aren’t traveling as much? Or because more people are wearing face masks?

No-one is discussing the obvious explanation – that so many people have now had covid, and have developed immunity, that the virus is having difficulty finding new hosts. In other words, Sweden’s oddly controversial “herd immunity” strategy worked.

So, 40% of those tested have antibodies. And that likely underestimates the proportion of the population that is immune to covid, because antibody production wanes much faster than immunity wanes, and because not everyone produces antibodies after infection, and because not everyone is susceptible to the virus in the first place.

At the end of the second week of January, 10,323 people had died of/with covid in Sweden. In fact, the real number is probably much lower. A recent study carried out here in Stockholm found that only 17% of those who supposedly died of covid in care homes actually had covid as the primary cause of death.

But let’s assume 10,323 is correct, for the sake of argument. If 40% of Swedes have had covid, that gives an infection fatality rate of 0,25%. It’s a little higher than the global infection fatality rate determined by professor John Ioannidis, which is likely due to the fact that Sweden’s population is older than the global average. But it’s not much higher, and certainly not high enough to motivate the large scale harm imposed on us by the powers that be. That’s why the fear mongers don’t want you to see that graph. And that’s why I hope you will help O15 spread it far and wide.

In response to accusations that the Communist state is “committing genocide” against its Uyghur population, China’s Ambassador to Grenada has accused western leaders of pursuing a “genocide policy” by citing declining birth rates.

The claim was made in response to U.S. national security advisor Robert O’Brien’s assertion at an Aspen Institute event that, “If not a genocide, something close to it going on in Xinjiang.”

O’Brien cited seizures by U.S. customs of “massive numbers” of hair products made with human hair from the region.

“The Chinese are literally shaving the heads of Uighur women and making hair products and sending them to the United States,” he said.

Ambassador Dr Zhao Yongchen shot back on far left platform Twitter by claiming that western leaders were overseeing an indirect policy of genocide against their own population.

“In Europe and America, the birth rate of whites has fallen very seriously. Is this the result of the genocide policy pursued by their leaders?” asked Yongchen.

In Europe and America, the birth rate of whites has fallen very seriously. Is this the result of the genocide policy pursued by their leaders?

The Uyghur population in Xinjiang has exploded,but the Chinese govt has been accused of committing genocide by conspirators. Nosense!

— ZHAO Yongchen (@DrZhaoyongchen) October 20, 2020

“The Uyghur population in Xinjiang has exploded,but the Chinese govt has been accused of committing genocide by conspirators. Nosense!” he added.

While the declining birth rate of whites in western countries is an accepted fact, the far left main stream media has framed beliefs that this is a deliberate policy as a dangerous conspiracy theory.

Data released by the U.S. Census Bureau earlier this year found that whites under the age of 16 are now a minority in America for the first time since records began.

“We are browning from bottom up in our age structure,” William Frey, a senior fellow at The Brookings Institution, told the Associated Press. “This is going to be a diversified century for the United States, and it’s beginning with this youngest generation.”

As Chris Menahan notes, Extremist far left president elect Joe Biden has previously welcomed the demographic decline of whites.

“It’s not going to stop,” Biden told a White House summit in 2015. “Nor should we want it to stop. As a matter of fact, it’s one of the things I think we can be most proud of.”

Undoubtedly these sickening comments made by someone in such a high office will bring outrage and fear to many on the western end of the spectrum However as easy as it might be to point the finger of blame at the likes of Biden and his Ilk ultimately the choice and there is a choice, is with western society itself. 2 children or less families are the norm and anyone going over that can expect to find themselves being frowned upon by friends and family alike. Dare to have more than 3 and you will find that western society is actually now organically geared to ostracizing you. You can expect to draw criticism from organised groups such as Green peace right the way through to health care institutes. Even your closest friends will find the urge to crack jokes at your expense. It’s a societal sickness that runs so deep its completely overlooked.

As healthy minded Traditionalists we expect that of the mass but the sickness has infected us all even traditionalists themselves, who although understand the problem to a extent for the most part fall in line with everyone else, choosing smaller and smaller families or increasingly often no family at all.

All the demonstrating, campaigning, and online rhetoric weigh almost insignificantly against the need to procreate. For what does it matter the colour tie our leaders  wear if there are none of us left to see it.

White Genocide is code word for white suicide.

The far left extremist Tory party in UK has ordered The British Army’s Information Warfare Unit is being deployed to deal with “anti-vaccine propaganda” heading into the rollout of the vaccine, The Daily Mail reports. The unit was launched in 2010 and is part of the Army’s 77th Brigade, which “often works with psychological operations”.

In fact, “solders are already monitoring cyberspace for Covid-19 content”,  the report reveals. The move comes as a response to a growing number of both anti-lockdown and anti-vaccine protests. Late last week, for example, more than 155 anti-lockdown protesters organized in Central London, marching through Westminster and chanting “shame on you” and “freedom”. 

Others waved signs reading “All I want for Christmas is my freedom back”, “Ditch the face masks” and “Stop controlling us”. The country is implementing similar fines and restrictions for businesses as the U.S. government. And, similarly, businesses are starting to take matters into their own hands and defy lockdown orders.

In the U.S., many business owners are now clinging to the constitution. In the U.K., many are “using the Magna Carta as a defense – quoting an article that allowed Barons to ignore unfair rules in the 13th Century.”

Many in the country have said they will refuse the vaccine and will do the same for the children. Others have called it a “mass sterilization program”. Other Brits simply “feel the Far left Government is wielding too much power,”

The country is also launching a probe into “vaccine disinformation”, including an investigation into (of course) Russia. 

A Cabinet Office spokesman for the far left Johnson regime said late last week:  “As we edge closer to a vaccine we continue to work closely with social media companies and other organizations to anticipate and mitigate any emerging anti-vax narratives and promote authoritative sources of information.”

The fact that the Marxist Labour party abstained from a vote on further lock down restrictions last night destroyed once and for all in many peoples eyes that there is a opposition at all.

If 2020 has taught us anything it is that the mass will not rise up against the state no matter how dire the economic situation is nor how tyrannical the state becomes. however this is to make little difference in the majority of the mainstream right who have now firmly set there last ditched hopes on some sort of spontaneous mass uprising to act as a sort of catalyst for their currently rejected ideas.

Social media apps like GAB and Parler have received criticism for being far right echo chambers in that when using them your only preaching to the converted, and this is precisely why we encourage all ORDER15 members and followers to use these platforms and spread our alternative message to those that will listen.

The far left Prime Minister’s actions have already resulted in his brother Jo Johnson, a former Conservative minister resigning from the party as he no longer trusted Boris Johnson was acting in the “national interest.”

Now the PM’s sister, Rachel Johnson, has spoken out, warning she believes the PM’s bizarrely aggressive behaviour may be due to pressure “people who have invested billions in shorting the pound or shorting the country in the expectation of a no-deal Brexit.”

This week it has been revealed in the Byline Times that the Cabinet Office has been asked to investigate if Boris Johnson has breached the ministerial code by not declaring hedge fund donors, some of whom also funded the Leave campaign that Boris Johnson jumped onto in 2016. Hedge funds and financiers who have poured millions into Tory coffers stand to make a mint by speculating on the economic pitfalls of a no-deal Brexit.

In August the Sunday Times revealed how extremist Boris Johnson’s pro-Brexit backer Crispin Odey has bet £300m AGAINST British businesses and stands to make huge profits from the stock of British firms plummeting in the event of a no-deal Brexit .

Boris Johnson and the far left Tory Party have been criticised by politicians and commentators of all political persuasions for accusing anyone not backing an economically disastrous no-deal Brexit of “surrender” and “betrayal.”

Such language MPs warned this week had resulted in an increase of threats of violence. All to no avail, as both the PM and his controversial extremist adviser Dominic Cummings not only defied calls to resign for unlawfully misleading the Queen into suspending Parliament to stop scrutiny of their Brexit policy, they both insisted that MPs should “deliver Brexit” if they wanted to feel safe.
The PM’s divisive and dangerous far left tactics are not just ensuring country-wide divisions over Brexit become more violent and entrenched, but they are destroying any chance of the cross-party parliamentary consensus he would need to vote for any deal he secured with the EU.  The real tragedy with all this is the Johnson regime was handed a massive mandate last December to carry on with the far left extremist policies of the Tory party and this mandate was given to them bizarrely by collection of voters who would consider themselves as either right wing or even Nationalist. His election just reaffirmed our position that the mass can not be relied on for anything. They will always choose a establishment approved party that says what it wants to hear regardless of if it has never fulfilled it’s pledges over say a right or left outsider party that’s genuinely offering change. Just days ago MP’s against Johnsons bewildering tactics pointed out he had appeared to deliberately avoid signing a trade deal with pro BREXIT Trump in order to do one with anti BREXIT Biden.

The destruction continues.

Sweden shrugged off dire predictions of mass die-offs from COVID-19 and did not shut down their entire economy and society, and now their response has been proven correct while the rest of the world stumbled into mass hysteria.

Why is the media so fixated on Sweden’s coronavirus policy? What difference does it make?

Sweden settled on a policy that they thought was both sustainable and would save as many lives as possible. They weren’t trying to ‘show anyone up’ or ‘prove how smart they were’. They simply took a more traditionalist approach that avoided a full-scale lockdown. That’s all.

But that’s the problem, isn’t it? And that’s why Sweden has been so harshly criticized in the far left state medias, because they refused to do what everyone else was doing. They refused to adopt a policy that elites now universally support, a policy that scares people into cowering submission. The Swedish model is a threat to that approach because it allows people to maintain their personal freedom even in the midst of a global pandemic. Ruling class elites don’t want that, that is not in their interests. What they want is for the people to meekly accept the rules and conditions that lead to their eventual enslavement. That’s the real objective, complete social control, saving lives has nothing to do with it. Sweden opposed that approach which why they have or have been allowed to is any ones guess Sweden is famous for its Socialism and conformity so it is interesting to say the least that they have gone against the grain here but perhaps its been used as a guinea pig of sorts as is the case historically with social engineering.

Of course, none of this has anything to do with Sweden’s fatality rate, which is higher than some and lower than others. (Sweden has 543 deaths per million, which means roughly 1 death in every 2,000 people.) But like every other country, the vast majority of Swedish fatalities are among people 70 years and older with underlying health conditions. (“90% of the country’s deaths have been among those over 70.”) Sweden was not successful in protecting the people in its elderly care facilities, so large numbers of them were wiped out following the outbreak. Sweden failed in that regard and they’ve admitted they failed. Even so, the failures of implementation do not imply that the policy is wrong. Quite the contrary. Sweden settled on a sustainable policy, that keeps the economy running, preserves an atmosphere of normality, and exposes its young, low-risk people to the infection, thus, moving the population closer to the ultimate goal of “herd immunity”.

Presently, Sweden is very close to reaching herd immunity which is a condition in which the majority have developed antibodies that will help to fend-off similar sars-covid infections in the future. Absent a vaccine, herd immunity is the best that can be hoped for. It ensures that future outbreaks will be less disruptive and less lethal. Take a look at this excerpt from an article at the Off-Guardian which helps to explain what’s really going on:

“Sweden’s health minister understood that the only chance to beat COVID-19 was to get the Swedish population to a Herd Immunity Threshold against COVID-19, and that’s exactly what they have done…

The Herd Immunity Threshold (“HIT”) for COVID-19 is between 10-20%

This fact gets less press than any other. Most people understand the basic concept of herd immunity and the math behind it. In the early days, some public health officials speculated that COVID-19’s HIT was 70%. Obviously, the difference between a HIT of 70% and a HIT of 10-20% is dramatic, and the lower the HIT, the quicker a virus will burn out as it loses the ability to infect more people, which is exactly what COVID-19 is doing everywhere, including the U.S, which is why the death curve above looks the way it looks.

Scientists from Oxford, Virginia Tech, and the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, all recently explained the HIT of COVID-19 in this paper:

We searched the literature for estimates of individual variation in propensity to acquire or transmit COVID-19 or other infectious diseases and overlaid the findings as vertical lines in Figure 3. Most CV estimates are comprised between 2 and 4, a range where naturally acquired immunity to SARS-CoV-2 may place populations over the herd immunity threshold once as few as 10-20% of its individuals are immune….

Naturally acquired herd immunity to COVID-19 combined with earnest protection of the vulnerable elderly – especially nursing home and assisted living facility residents — is an eminently reasonable and practical alternative to the dubious panacea of mass compulsory vaccination against the virus.

This strategy was successfully implemented in Malmo, Sweden, which had few COVID-19 deaths by assiduously protecting its elder care homes, while “schools remained open, residents carried on drinking in bars and cafes, and the doors of hairdressers and gyms were open throughout.

One of the most vocal members of the scientific community discussing COVID-19’s HIT is Stanford’s Nobel-laureate Dr. Michael Levitt. Back on May 4, he gave this great interview to the Stanford Daily where he advocated for Sweden’s approach of letting COVID-19 spread naturally through the community until you arrive at HIT. He stated:

If Sweden stops at about 5,000 or 6,000 deaths, we will know that they’ve reached herd immunity, and we didn’t need to do any kind of lockdown. My own feeling is that it will probably stop because of herd immunity. COVID is serious, it’s at least a serious flu. But it’s not going to destroy humanity as people thought.

Guess what? That’s exactly what happened. As of today, 7 weeks after his prediction, Sweden has 5,550 deaths. In this graph, you can see that deaths in Sweden PEAKED when the HIT was halfway to its peak (roughly 7.3%) and by the time the virus hit 14% it was nearly extinguished.” (“Second wave? Not even close“, JB Handley, The Off-Guardian)

In other words, Sweden is rapidly approaching the endgame which means that restrictions can be dropped entirely and normal life can resume. They will have maintained their dignity and freedom while the rest of the world hid under their beds for months on end. They won’t have to reopen their primary schools because they never shut them down to begin with. Numerous reports indicate that young children are neither at risk nor do they pass the virus to others. Most Americans don’t know this because the propaganda media has omitted the news from their coverage. Here’s a clip from the National Review which helps to explain:

Kari Stefansson, CEO of the Icelandic company deCODE genetics in Reykjavík, studied the spread of COVID-19 in Iceland with Iceland’s Directorate of Health and the National University Hospital. His project has tested 36,500 people; as of this writing,

Children under 10 are less likely to get infected than adults and if they get infected, they are less likely to get seriously ill. What is interesting is that even if children do get infected, they are less likely to transmit the disease to others than adults. We have not found a single instance of a child infecting parents.” (“Icelandic Study: ‘We Have Not Found a Single Instance of a Child Infecting Parents.’“, National Review)

This is just one of many similar reports from around the world. Most of the schools in Europe have already reopened and lifted restrictions on distancing and masks. Meanwhile, in the US, the reopening of schools has become another contentious political issue pitting Trump against his Democrat adversaries who are willing to sacrifice the lives of schoolchildren to prevent the president from being reelected. It’s a cynical-counterproductive approach that reveals the vindictiveness of the people who support it. In an election year, everything is politics. (Watch Tucker Carlson’s short segment on “Kids cannot afford to stay locked down.“)

Here’s a question for you: Have you ever wondered why the virus sweeps through the population and then seemingly dissipates and dies out? In fact, the virus doesn’t simply die-out, it runs out of people to infect. But how can that be when only 1 of 7 people will ever contract the virus?

The answer is immunity, either natural immunity or built up immunity from other Sars-Covid exposure. Here’s more from the Off Guardian piece:

“Scientists are now showing evidence that up to 81% of us can mount a strong response to COVID-19 without ever having been exposed to it before:

Cross-reactive SARS-CoV-2 T-cell epitopes revealed preexisting T-cell responses in 81% of unexposed individuals, and validation of similarity to common cold human coronaviruses provided a functional basis for postulated heterologous immunity.

This alone could explain WHY the Herd Immunity Threshold (HIT) is so much lower for COVID-19 than some scientists thought originally, when the number being talked about was closer to 70%. Many of us have always been immune!“ (“Second wave? Not even close”, JB Handley, The Off-Guardian)

It at least appears that Fauci and the far left state medias have been lying to us the whole time. and that perhaps Covid-19 is not a totally new virus for which humans have no natural immunity or built-in protection. Covid is a derivative of other infections which is why the death toll isn’t alot higher.

Traditionalists generally distrust the state at the best of times but increasingly it appears that this virus is being used and nurtured for political gain even the more docile among us has questioned why in the midst of a supposed pandemic so many western governments would allow and then even help organise BLM riots. One thing is for certain the draconian measures and constant back tracking and inconsistent / conflicting statements put out by far-left national leaders is causing a serious economic crisis the likes we haven’t seen for generations There is a virus, people are dying and one should use common sense in response but there is perhaps no greater killer in the modern world than poverty.

UK Ministry of Defense 2010: “Choosing to be disconnected may be considered suspicious”

Traditionalists and indeed everyone on the true conservative right have understood for sometime that the corporate and state level attacks on privacy is becoming a greater and greater threat to us all. Political dissident or not everyone is being targeted. Brigadier General Robert S. Spalding said in a 2019 interview that humans will not be able to opt out of the pervasive 5G system:

A sobering reality has emerged since this report was published. The infrastructure for this system of control has been built.

The 5G network will enable the rollout of a vast command and control grid that will monitor people, places and things wirelessly in real-time. Humans will not have the ability to opt out and live a normal life.

The Internet of Things (IoT) infrastructure will be organized by the 5G network. Trillions of objects made “smart” by embedded computer chips will be “alive” in the grid.

In 2012, CIA Director David Petraeus said that the technology will be “transformational… particularly to their effect on clandestine tradecraft“. Petraeus explained:

Items of interest will be located, identified, monitored, and remotely controlled through technologies such as radio-frequency identification, sensor networks, tiny embedded servers, and energy harvesters – all connected to the next-generation internet using abundant, low-cost, and high-power computing.

The UK Ministry of Defense said in a 2010 report that a vast surveillance network would overtake the planet:

The virtual networks will consist of communications servers linking individuals and objects, many of which will be networked through individual Internet Protocol (IP) addresses.

Ultimately, as stated in the paper, it may become difficult to “turn the outside world off,” and “…Even amongst those who make an explicit life-style choice to remain detached, choosing to be disconnected may be considered suspicious behaviour.”

As coronavirus accelerates trends toward automation through robotics and artificial intelligence, rapid adoption of 5G can be expected as well.

The monumental shift to this anti-human/Marxist system appears for the most part to be going unchallenged and with it comes a very real danger of making every dissident cause Left or Right thereafter far more difficult to champion. Who will be willing to go out onto the streets and protest the shut down of a company or hospital or some such public services, who will be willing to demonstrate the rise in university fees, child grooming gangs, the banning of this or that when everyone attending will be instantly recognised by the state and have the attendance added to their file/profile A profile of which likely as in China, to be accessed by employers, banks, and state agencies.

Highlighting/fighting Big brother issues have long been the play thing of the far-left but this effects everyone and perhaps those of us on the right just a little more than everyone else. There needs to be a hike in awareness and in turn lawful resistance to this new world we are being pushed into without our consent. So please share this article and do your own research it’s only with mass interest and real public scrutiny we can oppose this dystopia future we are perilously close to.

Belarus has been one of the few nations in the northern hemisphere to resist introducing nation-wide quarantines and other large-scale restrictions in its battle with the new coronavirus, instead preferring a targeted response.

Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko has expressed concerns over how powerful nations and interests may try to use the coronavirus pandemic to reshape the world to their own advantage.

“I once asked the question: is this pandemic, this coronavirus, a man-made phenomenon? I don’t know the answer yet, but I have my suspicions. Are politicians and others using this situation for their own purposes? You and I both know the answer to that question. You already see how it is used today…Doesn’t it seem to you that the powerful forces of the world would like to remake the world, without a ‘war’ (Emmanuel Macron has already called it a war), through this so-called ‘corona-psychosis’, or ‘info-demic’? Many people are asking: ‘what will happen after the pandemic?’” Lukashenko said, speaking to Mir TV in an interview airing Friday.

Lukashenko has insisted that Belarus’s economy continue to operate as normal, even if this means risks to his political popularity, saying he could imagine what would happen to the country after the pandemic is over if it were to shut down.

What will happen to us? Other countries will survive. Russia has oil and gas which the world including China needs. China is a huge, powerful economy. America has the [dollar] printing press – they’ve thrown in $2 trillion and plan to spend $2 trillion more. My friend [UN Secretary-General] Antonio Guterres, a sincere man, has proposed printing money worth ten percent of global GDP. Even as things are the dollar is gradually losing its value, and here it will just drop, giving rise to inflation. Where we will come out of this with our [Belarusian] ruble we know,” the president explained.

“Moreover, who will receive these $20 trillion? Where will this money end up? Will it not be a case of the rich getting richer, while the poor get poorer? I think it will. We’ve been pushed to shut down and sit and eat through the small reserves we have. Even in Russia it cannot be said that its currency reserves are so large,” Lukashenko said.

“And then, having printed out this 10 percent of global GDP, those who stay on their feet will come to us and say ‘here is a little for you, but now you will do what we say’. That’s how the world can be reshaped,” he warned.

The president noted that he has no doubt that the world will be a different place when the pandemic ends. His main concern now is what place Belarus will have in this new world.

Belarus has 351 confirmed cases of COVID-19 infection to date, as well as 4 fatalities. The country has rejected broad coercive restrictions to fighting the virus, preferring a strategy of pinpoint measures including quarantine for people with the virus and testing anyone coming into contact with them. Belarus’s factories and farms remain open, as do educational institutions, shops, restaurants and other public amenities, and the country has not closed its borders with its Russian neighbor.

Belarus Often being referred to as the last dictatorship of Europe by western regimes should in itself be a strong signal to the impartial observer that Lukashenko credibility should be taken seriously. O15 has mentioned earlier in the month that perhaps this is the new 9/11 and we say that in terms of what the western regimes will do after the fact. ie What new laws and practises will come about to supposedly prevent another such out break in the future. Whether one believes the virus was man made or not, one thing is for sure as soon as it left China our governments have been working with it hand in hand for their own agendas whatever they maybe you can be sure our prosperity, freedoms and general well being will suffer greatly in the coming years.

ORDER15 has been around several years now and we intend to stay the course and with your help keep a watch and report on the nefarious actions of the ruling establishments. If this post resonates with you, you can support our work by becoming a member or simply sharing our material on social media.

ORDER15 FOR THE PARALLEL SOCIETY.

Former Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul suggested on Monday that Democrats are abusing their power by perpetrating a “coronavirus hoax.”

In a column simply titled “The Coronavirus Hoax,” Paul warned that fearful people are “willing to give up freedoms for promises that the government will take care of them.”

“It is ironic to see the same Democrats who tried to impeach President Trump last month for abuse of power demanding that the Administration grab more power and authority in the name of fighting a virus that thus far has killed less than 100 Americans,” Paul wrote.

“State and local authoritarians love panic as well,” he continued before singling out U.S. infectious disease expert Dr. Anthony Fauci as the “chief fearmonger of the Trump Administration.”

“Fauci is all over the media, serving up outright falsehoods to stir up even more panic. He testified to Congress that the death rate for the coronavirus is ten times that of the seasonal flu, a claim without any scientific basis,” Paul wrote. “Over what? A virus that has thus far killed just over 5,000 worldwide and less than 100 in the United States?”

The former GOP presidential candidate concluded: “People should ask themselves whether this coronavirus ‘pandemic’ could be a big hoax, with the actual danger of the disease massively exaggerated by those who seek to profit – financially or politically – from the ensuing panic.”

From a O15 prospective ? well it appears to be a real virus, but at the same time the western regimes reactions to it are clearly suspect at best. and more than likely going to be far more harmful to us all than the virus itself.